Аdvocate in criminal proceedings: organizational and legal principles

I.V. Bondar, O.P. Kuchynska, Yu.V. Tsyganyuk
{"title":"Аdvocate in criminal proceedings: organizational and legal principles","authors":"I.V. Bondar, O.P. Kuchynska, Yu.V. Tsyganyuk","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the organizational and legal principles of the advocate’s activities in criminal proceedings. The authors noted that a major role in ensuring the rights and freedoms of individuals during criminal proceedings belongs to advocates, who must provide the necessary professional legal assistance to the participants in the process. But high-quality professional legal assistance of an advocate depends on many factors, both subjective and objective. It was determined that the quality of the legal regulation of an advocate’s activity in criminal proceedings directly affects him and, secondarily, the person to whom he provides professional legal assistance.When conducting research, the authors take as a basis the fact that the participation of an advocate in criminal proceedings requires the presence of 2 legal statuses: 1) an advocate of Ukraine, 2) the status of a participant in a criminal proceeding (defender or representative). Based on this approach, the collection of evidence by the defense, the right to receive information and copies of documents in the context of maintaining the secrecy of the pretrial investigation, the recusal of other participants in the criminal proceedings in connection with the involvement of a advocate who is related to the participant in the criminal proceedings, the provision of professional of legal assistance by an advocate to persons whose procedural status is not regulated in detail analyzed.Investigating the organizational principles of an advocate’s activity in criminal proceedings, the authors drew attention to the role of curfew in a advocate’s work, insufficient research into the tactics of a advocate’s tactics in criminal proceedings and methods of defense in proceedings regarding a separate category of criminal offenses. Based on the results, a conclusion was formed that among the outlined problems there is a regularity is connected with the fact that the Law of Ukraine “About Advocacy and Advocacy Activities” details separate provisions of the advocate’s participation in criminal proceedings, which are not defined by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, in turn, causes their uneven implementation by the authorized subjects of the CPC of Ukraine. And the research direction of the advocate’s participation tactics and methods of defense or representation in certain types of criminal proceedings is recognized as perspective.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the organizational and legal principles of the advocate’s activities in criminal proceedings. The authors noted that a major role in ensuring the rights and freedoms of individuals during criminal proceedings belongs to advocates, who must provide the necessary professional legal assistance to the participants in the process. But high-quality professional legal assistance of an advocate depends on many factors, both subjective and objective. It was determined that the quality of the legal regulation of an advocate’s activity in criminal proceedings directly affects him and, secondarily, the person to whom he provides professional legal assistance.When conducting research, the authors take as a basis the fact that the participation of an advocate in criminal proceedings requires the presence of 2 legal statuses: 1) an advocate of Ukraine, 2) the status of a participant in a criminal proceeding (defender or representative). Based on this approach, the collection of evidence by the defense, the right to receive information and copies of documents in the context of maintaining the secrecy of the pretrial investigation, the recusal of other participants in the criminal proceedings in connection with the involvement of a advocate who is related to the participant in the criminal proceedings, the provision of professional of legal assistance by an advocate to persons whose procedural status is not regulated in detail analyzed.Investigating the organizational principles of an advocate’s activity in criminal proceedings, the authors drew attention to the role of curfew in a advocate’s work, insufficient research into the tactics of a advocate’s tactics in criminal proceedings and methods of defense in proceedings regarding a separate category of criminal offenses. Based on the results, a conclusion was formed that among the outlined problems there is a regularity is connected with the fact that the Law of Ukraine “About Advocacy and Advocacy Activities” details separate provisions of the advocate’s participation in criminal proceedings, which are not defined by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, in turn, causes their uneven implementation by the authorized subjects of the CPC of Ukraine. And the research direction of the advocate’s participation tactics and methods of defense or representation in certain types of criminal proceedings is recognized as perspective.
Аdvocate刑事诉讼:组织和法律原则
本文探讨了刑事诉讼中辩护人活动的组织原则和法律原则。提交人指出,在刑事诉讼过程中确保个人权利和自由的主要作用属于辩护人,他们必须向诉讼过程的参与者提供必要的专业法律援助。但是,高质量的律师专业法律援助取决于许多因素,包括主观因素和客观因素。经确定,对刑事诉讼中辩护人活动的法律规定的质量直接影响到他本人,其次影响到他向其提供专业法律援助的人。在进行研究时,作者以辩护人参与刑事诉讼需要具备两种法律地位这一事实为依据:1)乌克兰辩护人,2)刑事诉讼参与人(辩护人或代理人)的身份。根据这种方法,辩护人收集证据、在保持审前调查保密的情况下获得资料和文件副本的权利、与刑事诉讼参与人有关系的辩护人的参与有关的其他刑事诉讼参与人的回避,详细分析了辩护人向程序地位不受管制的人提供专业法律援助的情况。在调查辩护人在刑事诉讼中活动的组织原则时,作者提请注意宵禁在辩护人工作中的作用,对辩护人在刑事诉讼中的策略和针对单独一类刑事犯罪的诉讼中的辩护方法的研究不足。根据结果,得出的结论是,在概述的问题中,有一个规律性与乌克兰法律“关于宣传和宣传活动”详细规定了辩护人参与刑事诉讼的单独规定有关,这些规定没有在乌克兰刑事诉讼法中加以界定,从而导致乌克兰共产党的授权主体不均衡地执行这些规定。并对特定类型刑事诉讼中辩护人的参与策略和辩护或代理方法的研究方向进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信