The Growth of the Turkish Film Industry and the Death of Suphi Kaner: Articulating a Star’s Suicide to the History of Labour in Cinema

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Serkan Şavk
{"title":"The Growth of the Turkish Film Industry and the Death of Suphi Kaner: Articulating a Star’s Suicide to the History of Labour in Cinema","authors":"Serkan Şavk","doi":"10.1080/01439685.2023.2256126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article focuses on the death of Suphi Kaner by suicide in 1963, an incident that overlaps with the rapid growth of the domestic film industry in Turkey. Kaner’s tragic death is discussed in popular literature solely in relation to his alcohol addiction, his possible depression, and his inability to cope with sudden stardom, leaving almost unmentioned the key role of the boycott call of the Producers Association against him. In 1963, the power struggle between the producers and the star actors was very visible. Within the framework of this power struggle, producers made a boycott statement about Kaner, for allegedly interrupting the shooting of a film. I approach the chain of events that concluded with Kaner’s suicide as an early example of labour disputes in Turkish cinema. This case demonstrates that the scope of labour disputes in film industries encompasses even star actors who are often considered as a privileged class. I argue that Kaner’s suicide could have been avoided by fairer employment conditions, and if the Producers Association had not called for the boycott. To examine the case, I make use of a variety of historical texts including memoirs, auto-biographies, news pieces, interviews, and commentaries. AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Hakan Erkılıç, Mine Kasapoğlu Turhan, Ebru Özyurt, Bahar Emgin Şavk, Gürçim Yılmaz and Alican Sekmeç for their contributions during the writing of this article. I am also grateful to Gökçen Karanfil for working meticulously on the manuscript and making valuable suggestions; to Necip Sarıcı, a versatile artist and collector and a friend of Kaner, for sharing his memories; and to Simon Mumford for proofreading this article with diligent care as he always does.Disclosure statementThe author reports there are no competing interests to declare.Notes1 The word ‘artist’ was specifically used to designate cinema actors by then. For all the numeric data about films, I refer to the Center for Turkish Cinema Studies (Türk Sinema Araştırmaları, TSA) database, https://www.tsa.org.tr/en/, accessed 22 September 2022.2 Resources mention the name of this association with variations such as Producers Association (Prodüktörler Cemiyeti), Producers Guild of Turkey (Türkiye Prodüktörler Birliği) and Producers Guild (Prodüktörler Birliği). For the sake of consistency, I refer to it as the Producers Association thereafter.3 Michael C. Nielsen, ‘Labour Power and Organization in the Early U.S. Motion Picture Industry’, Film History 2, no. 2 (1988): 121.4 Ronny Regev, Working in Hollywood: How the Studio System Turned Creativity into Labour (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2018).5 Regev, 19.6 For introductive knowledge about Yeşilçam and its production mode see Dilek Kaya, ‘Yeşilçam Döneminde Film Sansürü: Bir Müzakere ve Mücadele Alanı Olarak Film Sesi’, Kültür ve İletişim 20, no. 39 (2017): 12–34; Remake, Remix, Rip-Off: About Copy Culture & Turkish Pop Cinema, Belgesel, 2014; Savaş Arslan, Cinema in Turkey: A New Critical History, 1st ed. (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011); Ahmet Gürata, ‘Translating Modernity: Remakes in Turkish Cinema’, in Asian Cinemas: A Redar and Guide, ed. Dimitris Eleftheriotis and Gary Needham (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006), 242–54; Nezih Erdoğan and Deniz Göktürk, ‘Turkish Cinema’, in Companion Encyclopedia of Middle Eastern and North African Film, ed. Oliver Leaman (London: Routledge, 2001); Erman Şener, Yeşilçam ve Türk Sineması (İstanbul: Kamera Yayınları, 1970).7 For an overview of the regional management system see İlke Şanlıer Yüksel and Aydın Çam, ‘Çukurova’da 1960-1980 Dönemi Sinema Pratiklerinin Özel Bir Örneği: Yörük Filmleri’, Sinecine: Sinema Araştırmaları Dergisi 10, no. 2 (2019): 291–320, https://doi.org/10.32001/sinecine.639715; Hakan Erkılıç and Recep Ünal, ‘Türkiye Sinemasına Özgü Bir Üretim Tarzı Olarak Bölge İşletmeciliği: Adana Bölgesi İşletmeciliği Örnek Olay İncelemesi’, Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 5, no. 3 (2018): 54–74; Nilgün Abisel, ‘Türk Sinemasında Film Yapımı Üzerine Notlar’, in Türk Sineması Üzerine Yazılar, by Nilgün Abisel (Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi, 2005).8 Serkan Şavk and Burak Doğu, ‘Mapping Yeşilçam: A Relational Approach to the Turkish Film Industry’, CINEJ Cinema Journal 9, no. 2 (2021): 199, https://cinej.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/cinej/article/view/425/662.9 Şener, Yeşilçam ve Türk Sineması, 133–34. For the exchange rate I refer to the annual average of 1969 as 1 USD = 9 Turkish Liras.10 Alim Şerif Onaran, ‘Türkiye’de Sinemanın Örgütlenmesi Sorunu’, SBF Dergisi 29, no. 3 (1974): 65–66.11 Altan Başaran and M. Meryem Kurtulmuş, ‘Türk Film Endüstrisinde Çalışma İlişkileri ve Sendikalaşma’, Çalışma ve Toplum, no. 1 (2016): 207; Derya Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’ (PhD dissertation, Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2010), 85.12 Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’, 85.13 Başaran and Kurtulmuş, ‘Türk Film Endüstrisinde Çalışma İlişkileri ve Sendikalaşma’, 207–8; Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’, 114.14 Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’, 87–89.15 Çetin, 92; Nijat Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966) (Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1968), 136.16 Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’, 117.17 Onaran, ‘Türkiye’de Sinemanın Örgütlenmesi Sorunu’, 69.18 Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.19 ‘Film Yıldızı Müsabakası Finalistleri’, Ses, 29 June 1963, 3.20 Nijat Özön, Türk Sinema Tarihi 1896-1960, 3rd ed. (İstanbul: Doruk Yayımcılık, 2010), 237. The book was originally published in 1960.21 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, Ses, 31 August 1963, 5; Agâh Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası (İstanbul: Vizyon Yayıncılık, 1995); Agâh Özgüç, Türk Film Yapımcıları Sözlüğü (İstanbul: Fiyap, 1996); Hamide Yazer, ‘Suphi Kaner [Database Bio Entry]’, in Türk Sineması Araştırmaları, accessed 27 April 2022, https://www.tsa.org.tr/tr/kisi/kisibio/1153/suphi-kaner; ‘Suphi Kaner’, in Wikipedia, accessed 27 April 2022, https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suphi_Kaner.22 Savaş Ay, ‘Suphi Kaner Diye Bir Artistin İntiharı’, Takvim, 22 January 2010, https://www.takvim.com.tr/Yazarlar/Savas_Ay/2010/01/22/suphi_kaner_diye_bir_artistin_intihari.23 Öztürk Serengil, Yeşilçam’ı Benden Sorun (İstanbul: Milliyet Yayınları, 1985), 44–45.24 Hulki Saner, Bu Da Benim Filmim (İstanbul: Saner Filmcilik Kasetçilik, 1996), 65.25 Saner, 66.26 Since we do not have the original document of the boycott decision and we cannot access the archives of the Producers Association, it is not certain at which meeting the boycott decision was taken, who signed the decision, and who were on the executive board at that time. However, it is indisputable that Hulki Saner was an active member of the society in those years. He was the spokesman of the Association in the press conference organized after the death of Kaner. Yet, he was among the representatives of the Association at the First Turkish Cinema Council held in 1964. Nijat Özön, ‘Bir Şuranın Öyküsü,’ Yeni İnsan Yeni Sinema, 1998.27 In fact, Kaner directed 6 films in his career. He directed his last film right before committing suicide and the film was released after his death (Prison Fountain / Mapushane Çeşmesi, 1964).28 Özgüç, Türk Film Yapımcıları Sözlüğü, 88.29 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, 4.30 Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası, 50; Serengil, Yeşilçam’ı Benden Sorun, 56; ‘Bir Hikâyenin Sonu’, Akis Haftalık Aktüalite Mecmuası, 31 August 1963, 32.31 Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası, 53–54.32 Leah Shelef et al., ‘The Role of Past Suicidal Behavior on Current Suicidality: A Retrospective Study in the Israeli Military’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 2 (14 January 2021): 649, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020649; Sara Probert-Lindström et al., ‘Long-Term Risk Factors for Suicide in Suicide Attempters Examined at a Medical Emergency in Patient Unit: Results from a 32-Year Follow-up Study’, BMJ Open 10, no. 10 (1 October 2020): e038794, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038794; J. Michael Bostwick et al., ‘Suicide Attempt as a Risk Factor for Completed Suicide: Even More Lethal Than We Knew’, American Journal of Psychiatry 173, no. 11 (November 2016): 1094–1100, https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15070854; Zoltán Rihmer, ‘Depression and Suicidal Behaviour’, in International Handbook of Suicide Prevention: Research, Policiy and Practice, ed. Rory C. C’Connor, Stephen Platt, and Jacki Gordon (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 58–73; Alexander McGirr and Gustavo Turecki, ‘Schizophrenia, Other Psychotic Disorders, and Sucidal Behaviour’, in International Handbook of Suicide Prevention: Research, Policiy and Practice, ed. Rory C. C’Connor, Stephen Platt, and Jacki Gordon (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 76–92; Maurizio Pompili et al., ‘Suicidal Behavior and Alcohol Abuse’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7, no. 4 (2010): 1392–1431, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7041392; Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Suicidal Behaviors (American Psychiatric Association, 2010); Lena Nabuco de Abreu et al., ‘Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts in Bipolar Disorder Type I: An Update for the Clinician’, Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 31, no. 3 (7 August 2009): 271–80, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462009005000003.33 Devrim Newspaper and Agah Özgüç report the decleration in the same way, the original of which is not accessible ‘İntiharından Önce Kaner ile Yapılmış Olan Son Röportaj’, Devrim, 28 August 1963, 6; Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası, 50–51 In a contradictory way, both sources mention the date of the association’s decleration as June 13, 1963 and the date of the contract between Pesen Film and Kaner as 14.07.1963 which would mean that the contract was signed later on; Özön claims that the Producers Association requested its members to boycutt Saner on August 13, 1963. However, he does not clarify whether that is the date of the official decision or its publicity Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.34 The production year of the last 4 movies starring Suphi Kaner is 1964 in the TSA database. We can assume that these were shot just before the boycott decision but left in limbo after it and could only be completed the following year.35 According to the decision of the Censorship Commitee nr. 1963/111 the film’s title was changed from Nightingale of the Neighborhood (Mahallenin Bülbülü) to Tall and Wiry Lad Ali Karadoğan and Semire Ruken Öztürk, Sansür Karar Defterleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Türkiye’de Sinema Sansürünün Tarihi, 1932-1988, 2. Cilt 1963-1977 (Ankara: T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, 2022), 50 It is not certain whether that was the request of the producer or the Censorship Committee both of which could be the case. Most probably, the agreement with Kaner was made for the initial title. The making of the film started in 1963 as the decision number suggests. For an online copy of the film visit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j_VmjFT0dA.36 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, 4.37 Memduh Ün, Memduh Ün Filmlerini Anlatıyor, 2nd ed. (İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi, 2009), 25; Atıf Yılmaz, Söylemek Güzeldir (İstanbul: Afa Yayınları, 1995), 160; Şener, Yeşilçam ve Türk Sineması, 72.38 A contract signed between Acar Film Company and actor Yusuf Sezgin constitutes a perfect example of this ambiguity. This contract only mentions the name of the film and there is no reference to the screenplay, story or even subject of the film. ‘Acar Film Murat Köseoğlu Ile Yusuf Sezgin Arasında Mukavelename’, 14 October 1976, Serkan Şavk personal archive.39 For an excerpt form an interview with Erol Taş where he elabourates on how himself and his children were beaton by the audince see Usta Sinema Sanatçısı Erol Taş Bir Anısını Anlatıyor; Türkan Şoray, Sinemam ve Ben (İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2017), 67.40 ‘İntiharından Önce’, 6.41 ‘İntiharından Önce’, 6.42 ‘İntiharından Önce’, 6; ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, 4.43 Lütfi Akad, Işıkla Karanlık Arasında (İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2004), 308–9.44 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, 4.45 ‘Aktör Suphi Kaner Dün İntihar Etti’, Cumhuriyet, 26 August 1963, 1; Ç., ‘Şey… Buyurun Görün’, Milliyet, 27 August 1963, 1.46 ‘Artist Suphi Kaner Dün İntihar Etti’, Milliyet, 26 August 1963, 1.47 Necip Sarıcı, a friend of Suphi Kaner and one of the witnesses of the process told that he does not remember any details about a second decision of the association, and that the decision taken in June came into the public opinion only in August. In this regard, Sarıcı’s witness supports Özön’s chronology as he dates the beginning of boycutt to August 13, 1963. Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.48 Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası, 52; ‘Artist Suphi Kaner Dün İntihar Etti’; ‘Aktör Suphi Kaner Dün İntihar Etti’; ‘Bir Hikâyenin Sonu’, 32.49 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Cenaze Töreninde Hadise Çıktı’, Cumhuriyet, 28 August 1963, 1, 5.50 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Cenaze Töreninde Hadise Çıktı’, 5.51 ‘Kaner’i Sevenler’, Milliyet, 29 August 1963, 1; ‘Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu’, Cumhuriyet, 29 August 1963, 5; Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.52 ‘Kaner’i Sevenler’, 1; ‘Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu’, 5.53 ‘Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu’, 5.54 ‘Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu’, 5.55 T. Kakınç, ‘Şimdi Ne Olacak?’, Akis Haftalık Aktüalite Mecmuası, 7 September 1963, 30.56 Kakınç, 30; For a list of the occupational groups covered by Sine-İş see. ‘İşçi Arkadaş [Announcement Letter]’ (Sine-İş, 1963), https://phebusmuzayede.com/3594-sine-is-turk-sinema-iscileri-sendikasi-bildirisi-1963-tarihli-23-5x30-5cm.html.57 Kakınç, ‘Şimdi Ne Olacak?’, 30.58 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Cenaze Töreninde Hadise Çıktı’, 5.59 ‘Olaylar ve İnsanlar’, Milliyet, 4 September 1963, 2.60 Seraceddin Zıddıoğlu, ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ölümüne Sebep Olanları Yiyecek’, Milliyet, 1 September 1963, 5.61 Özgüç, Türk Film Yapımcıları Sözlüğü, 122; Turhan Gürkan, ‘Nevzat Pesen’in Beklenmedik Ölümü’, Cumhuriyet, 14 February 1973, 6.62 For an exceptional psychoanalsis of a deceased person based on her letters see Saffet Murat Tura, ‘Şeyh ve Ayna’, in Şeyh ve Arzu, 2nd ed. (İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2008).63 Danae Clark, Negotiating Hollywood: The Cultural Politics of Actors’ Labour (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).64 Clark, 11.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSerkan ŞavkSerkan Şavk received his PhD in 2014 from Hacettepe University, Department of History. He pursued post-doctoral studies at Princeton University with a focus on digital history (2016–2017). His research interests cover a variety of subjects including history of Turkish cinema, Digital Humanities, and image-space-culture relations in a historical context. Currently, he’s the principal investigator of two research projects: DOYeşilçam A data-driven, digital and open approach to the history of Turkish cinema: Examining stylistic features of Yeşilçam films (funded by TÜBİTAK The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) and Animals as Actors, Vehicles, and Props: Metazoa in the History of Turkish Cinema (funded by Izmir University of Economics).","PeriodicalId":44618,"journal":{"name":"HISTORICAL JOURNAL OF FILM RADIO AND TELEVISION","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORICAL JOURNAL OF FILM RADIO AND TELEVISION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2023.2256126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis article focuses on the death of Suphi Kaner by suicide in 1963, an incident that overlaps with the rapid growth of the domestic film industry in Turkey. Kaner’s tragic death is discussed in popular literature solely in relation to his alcohol addiction, his possible depression, and his inability to cope with sudden stardom, leaving almost unmentioned the key role of the boycott call of the Producers Association against him. In 1963, the power struggle between the producers and the star actors was very visible. Within the framework of this power struggle, producers made a boycott statement about Kaner, for allegedly interrupting the shooting of a film. I approach the chain of events that concluded with Kaner’s suicide as an early example of labour disputes in Turkish cinema. This case demonstrates that the scope of labour disputes in film industries encompasses even star actors who are often considered as a privileged class. I argue that Kaner’s suicide could have been avoided by fairer employment conditions, and if the Producers Association had not called for the boycott. To examine the case, I make use of a variety of historical texts including memoirs, auto-biographies, news pieces, interviews, and commentaries. AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Hakan Erkılıç, Mine Kasapoğlu Turhan, Ebru Özyurt, Bahar Emgin Şavk, Gürçim Yılmaz and Alican Sekmeç for their contributions during the writing of this article. I am also grateful to Gökçen Karanfil for working meticulously on the manuscript and making valuable suggestions; to Necip Sarıcı, a versatile artist and collector and a friend of Kaner, for sharing his memories; and to Simon Mumford for proofreading this article with diligent care as he always does.Disclosure statementThe author reports there are no competing interests to declare.Notes1 The word ‘artist’ was specifically used to designate cinema actors by then. For all the numeric data about films, I refer to the Center for Turkish Cinema Studies (Türk Sinema Araştırmaları, TSA) database, https://www.tsa.org.tr/en/, accessed 22 September 2022.2 Resources mention the name of this association with variations such as Producers Association (Prodüktörler Cemiyeti), Producers Guild of Turkey (Türkiye Prodüktörler Birliği) and Producers Guild (Prodüktörler Birliği). For the sake of consistency, I refer to it as the Producers Association thereafter.3 Michael C. Nielsen, ‘Labour Power and Organization in the Early U.S. Motion Picture Industry’, Film History 2, no. 2 (1988): 121.4 Ronny Regev, Working in Hollywood: How the Studio System Turned Creativity into Labour (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2018).5 Regev, 19.6 For introductive knowledge about Yeşilçam and its production mode see Dilek Kaya, ‘Yeşilçam Döneminde Film Sansürü: Bir Müzakere ve Mücadele Alanı Olarak Film Sesi’, Kültür ve İletişim 20, no. 39 (2017): 12–34; Remake, Remix, Rip-Off: About Copy Culture & Turkish Pop Cinema, Belgesel, 2014; Savaş Arslan, Cinema in Turkey: A New Critical History, 1st ed. (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011); Ahmet Gürata, ‘Translating Modernity: Remakes in Turkish Cinema’, in Asian Cinemas: A Redar and Guide, ed. Dimitris Eleftheriotis and Gary Needham (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006), 242–54; Nezih Erdoğan and Deniz Göktürk, ‘Turkish Cinema’, in Companion Encyclopedia of Middle Eastern and North African Film, ed. Oliver Leaman (London: Routledge, 2001); Erman Şener, Yeşilçam ve Türk Sineması (İstanbul: Kamera Yayınları, 1970).7 For an overview of the regional management system see İlke Şanlıer Yüksel and Aydın Çam, ‘Çukurova’da 1960-1980 Dönemi Sinema Pratiklerinin Özel Bir Örneği: Yörük Filmleri’, Sinecine: Sinema Araştırmaları Dergisi 10, no. 2 (2019): 291–320, https://doi.org/10.32001/sinecine.639715; Hakan Erkılıç and Recep Ünal, ‘Türkiye Sinemasına Özgü Bir Üretim Tarzı Olarak Bölge İşletmeciliği: Adana Bölgesi İşletmeciliği Örnek Olay İncelemesi’, Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 5, no. 3 (2018): 54–74; Nilgün Abisel, ‘Türk Sinemasında Film Yapımı Üzerine Notlar’, in Türk Sineması Üzerine Yazılar, by Nilgün Abisel (Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi, 2005).8 Serkan Şavk and Burak Doğu, ‘Mapping Yeşilçam: A Relational Approach to the Turkish Film Industry’, CINEJ Cinema Journal 9, no. 2 (2021): 199, https://cinej.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/cinej/article/view/425/662.9 Şener, Yeşilçam ve Türk Sineması, 133–34. For the exchange rate I refer to the annual average of 1969 as 1 USD = 9 Turkish Liras.10 Alim Şerif Onaran, ‘Türkiye’de Sinemanın Örgütlenmesi Sorunu’, SBF Dergisi 29, no. 3 (1974): 65–66.11 Altan Başaran and M. Meryem Kurtulmuş, ‘Türk Film Endüstrisinde Çalışma İlişkileri ve Sendikalaşma’, Çalışma ve Toplum, no. 1 (2016): 207; Derya Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’ (PhD dissertation, Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2010), 85.12 Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’, 85.13 Başaran and Kurtulmuş, ‘Türk Film Endüstrisinde Çalışma İlişkileri ve Sendikalaşma’, 207–8; Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’, 114.14 Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’, 87–89.15 Çetin, 92; Nijat Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966) (Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1968), 136.16 Çetin, ‘Türk Sineması Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme Sorunları’, 117.17 Onaran, ‘Türkiye’de Sinemanın Örgütlenmesi Sorunu’, 69.18 Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.19 ‘Film Yıldızı Müsabakası Finalistleri’, Ses, 29 June 1963, 3.20 Nijat Özön, Türk Sinema Tarihi 1896-1960, 3rd ed. (İstanbul: Doruk Yayımcılık, 2010), 237. The book was originally published in 1960.21 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, Ses, 31 August 1963, 5; Agâh Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası (İstanbul: Vizyon Yayıncılık, 1995); Agâh Özgüç, Türk Film Yapımcıları Sözlüğü (İstanbul: Fiyap, 1996); Hamide Yazer, ‘Suphi Kaner [Database Bio Entry]’, in Türk Sineması Araştırmaları, accessed 27 April 2022, https://www.tsa.org.tr/tr/kisi/kisibio/1153/suphi-kaner; ‘Suphi Kaner’, in Wikipedia, accessed 27 April 2022, https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suphi_Kaner.22 Savaş Ay, ‘Suphi Kaner Diye Bir Artistin İntiharı’, Takvim, 22 January 2010, https://www.takvim.com.tr/Yazarlar/Savas_Ay/2010/01/22/suphi_kaner_diye_bir_artistin_intihari.23 Öztürk Serengil, Yeşilçam’ı Benden Sorun (İstanbul: Milliyet Yayınları, 1985), 44–45.24 Hulki Saner, Bu Da Benim Filmim (İstanbul: Saner Filmcilik Kasetçilik, 1996), 65.25 Saner, 66.26 Since we do not have the original document of the boycott decision and we cannot access the archives of the Producers Association, it is not certain at which meeting the boycott decision was taken, who signed the decision, and who were on the executive board at that time. However, it is indisputable that Hulki Saner was an active member of the society in those years. He was the spokesman of the Association in the press conference organized after the death of Kaner. Yet, he was among the representatives of the Association at the First Turkish Cinema Council held in 1964. Nijat Özön, ‘Bir Şuranın Öyküsü,’ Yeni İnsan Yeni Sinema, 1998.27 In fact, Kaner directed 6 films in his career. He directed his last film right before committing suicide and the film was released after his death (Prison Fountain / Mapushane Çeşmesi, 1964).28 Özgüç, Türk Film Yapımcıları Sözlüğü, 88.29 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, 4.30 Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası, 50; Serengil, Yeşilçam’ı Benden Sorun, 56; ‘Bir Hikâyenin Sonu’, Akis Haftalık Aktüalite Mecmuası, 31 August 1963, 32.31 Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası, 53–54.32 Leah Shelef et al., ‘The Role of Past Suicidal Behavior on Current Suicidality: A Retrospective Study in the Israeli Military’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 2 (14 January 2021): 649, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020649; Sara Probert-Lindström et al., ‘Long-Term Risk Factors for Suicide in Suicide Attempters Examined at a Medical Emergency in Patient Unit: Results from a 32-Year Follow-up Study’, BMJ Open 10, no. 10 (1 October 2020): e038794, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038794; J. Michael Bostwick et al., ‘Suicide Attempt as a Risk Factor for Completed Suicide: Even More Lethal Than We Knew’, American Journal of Psychiatry 173, no. 11 (November 2016): 1094–1100, https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15070854; Zoltán Rihmer, ‘Depression and Suicidal Behaviour’, in International Handbook of Suicide Prevention: Research, Policiy and Practice, ed. Rory C. C’Connor, Stephen Platt, and Jacki Gordon (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 58–73; Alexander McGirr and Gustavo Turecki, ‘Schizophrenia, Other Psychotic Disorders, and Sucidal Behaviour’, in International Handbook of Suicide Prevention: Research, Policiy and Practice, ed. Rory C. C’Connor, Stephen Platt, and Jacki Gordon (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 76–92; Maurizio Pompili et al., ‘Suicidal Behavior and Alcohol Abuse’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7, no. 4 (2010): 1392–1431, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7041392; Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Suicidal Behaviors (American Psychiatric Association, 2010); Lena Nabuco de Abreu et al., ‘Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts in Bipolar Disorder Type I: An Update for the Clinician’, Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 31, no. 3 (7 August 2009): 271–80, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462009005000003.33 Devrim Newspaper and Agah Özgüç report the decleration in the same way, the original of which is not accessible ‘İntiharından Önce Kaner ile Yapılmış Olan Son Röportaj’, Devrim, 28 August 1963, 6; Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası, 50–51 In a contradictory way, both sources mention the date of the association’s decleration as June 13, 1963 and the date of the contract between Pesen Film and Kaner as 14.07.1963 which would mean that the contract was signed later on; Özön claims that the Producers Association requested its members to boycutt Saner on August 13, 1963. However, he does not clarify whether that is the date of the official decision or its publicity Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.34 The production year of the last 4 movies starring Suphi Kaner is 1964 in the TSA database. We can assume that these were shot just before the boycott decision but left in limbo after it and could only be completed the following year.35 According to the decision of the Censorship Commitee nr. 1963/111 the film’s title was changed from Nightingale of the Neighborhood (Mahallenin Bülbülü) to Tall and Wiry Lad Ali Karadoğan and Semire Ruken Öztürk, Sansür Karar Defterleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Türkiye’de Sinema Sansürünün Tarihi, 1932-1988, 2. Cilt 1963-1977 (Ankara: T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, 2022), 50 It is not certain whether that was the request of the producer or the Censorship Committee both of which could be the case. Most probably, the agreement with Kaner was made for the initial title. The making of the film started in 1963 as the decision number suggests. For an online copy of the film visit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j_VmjFT0dA.36 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, 4.37 Memduh Ün, Memduh Ün Filmlerini Anlatıyor, 2nd ed. (İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi, 2009), 25; Atıf Yılmaz, Söylemek Güzeldir (İstanbul: Afa Yayınları, 1995), 160; Şener, Yeşilçam ve Türk Sineması, 72.38 A contract signed between Acar Film Company and actor Yusuf Sezgin constitutes a perfect example of this ambiguity. This contract only mentions the name of the film and there is no reference to the screenplay, story or even subject of the film. ‘Acar Film Murat Köseoğlu Ile Yusuf Sezgin Arasında Mukavelename’, 14 October 1976, Serkan Şavk personal archive.39 For an excerpt form an interview with Erol Taş where he elabourates on how himself and his children were beaton by the audince see Usta Sinema Sanatçısı Erol Taş Bir Anısını Anlatıyor; Türkan Şoray, Sinemam ve Ben (İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2017), 67.40 ‘İntiharından Önce’, 6.41 ‘İntiharından Önce’, 6.42 ‘İntiharından Önce’, 6; ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, 4.43 Lütfi Akad, Işıkla Karanlık Arasında (İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2004), 308–9.44 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ardından’, 4.45 ‘Aktör Suphi Kaner Dün İntihar Etti’, Cumhuriyet, 26 August 1963, 1; Ç., ‘Şey… Buyurun Görün’, Milliyet, 27 August 1963, 1.46 ‘Artist Suphi Kaner Dün İntihar Etti’, Milliyet, 26 August 1963, 1.47 Necip Sarıcı, a friend of Suphi Kaner and one of the witnesses of the process told that he does not remember any details about a second decision of the association, and that the decision taken in June came into the public opinion only in August. In this regard, Sarıcı’s witness supports Özön’s chronology as he dates the beginning of boycutt to August 13, 1963. Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.48 Özgüç, Türk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler Dosyası, 52; ‘Artist Suphi Kaner Dün İntihar Etti’; ‘Aktör Suphi Kaner Dün İntihar Etti’; ‘Bir Hikâyenin Sonu’, 32.49 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Cenaze Töreninde Hadise Çıktı’, Cumhuriyet, 28 August 1963, 1, 5.50 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Cenaze Töreninde Hadise Çıktı’, 5.51 ‘Kaner’i Sevenler’, Milliyet, 29 August 1963, 1; ‘Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu’, Cumhuriyet, 29 August 1963, 5; Özön, Türk Sineması Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.52 ‘Kaner’i Sevenler’, 1; ‘Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu’, 5.53 ‘Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu’, 5.54 ‘Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu’, 5.55 T. Kakınç, ‘Şimdi Ne Olacak?’, Akis Haftalık Aktüalite Mecmuası, 7 September 1963, 30.56 Kakınç, 30; For a list of the occupational groups covered by Sine-İş see. ‘İşçi Arkadaş [Announcement Letter]’ (Sine-İş, 1963), https://phebusmuzayede.com/3594-sine-is-turk-sinema-iscileri-sendikasi-bildirisi-1963-tarihli-23-5x30-5cm.html.57 Kakınç, ‘Şimdi Ne Olacak?’, 30.58 ‘Suphi Kaner’in Cenaze Töreninde Hadise Çıktı’, 5.59 ‘Olaylar ve İnsanlar’, Milliyet, 4 September 1963, 2.60 Seraceddin Zıddıoğlu, ‘Suphi Kaner’in Ölümüne Sebep Olanları Yiyecek’, Milliyet, 1 September 1963, 5.61 Özgüç, Türk Film Yapımcıları Sözlüğü, 122; Turhan Gürkan, ‘Nevzat Pesen’in Beklenmedik Ölümü’, Cumhuriyet, 14 February 1973, 6.62 For an exceptional psychoanalsis of a deceased person based on her letters see Saffet Murat Tura, ‘Şeyh ve Ayna’, in Şeyh ve Arzu, 2nd ed. (İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2008).63 Danae Clark, Negotiating Hollywood: The Cultural Politics of Actors’ Labour (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).64 Clark, 11.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSerkan ŞavkSerkan Şavk received his PhD in 2014 from Hacettepe University, Department of History. He pursued post-doctoral studies at Princeton University with a focus on digital history (2016–2017). His research interests cover a variety of subjects including history of Turkish cinema, Digital Humanities, and image-space-culture relations in a historical context. Currently, he’s the principal investigator of two research projects: DOYeşilçam A data-driven, digital and open approach to the history of Turkish cinema: Examining stylistic features of Yeşilçam films (funded by TÜBİTAK The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) and Animals as Actors, Vehicles, and Props: Metazoa in the History of Turkish Cinema (funded by Izmir University of Economics).
土耳其电影工业的发展和苏菲·卡纳之死:从一个明星的自杀到电影劳动的历史
摘要本文关注的是1963年Suphi Kaner的自杀事件,这一事件与土耳其国内电影产业的快速发展相重叠。在通俗文学中,Kaner的悲剧性死亡只与他的酗酒,他可能的抑郁症,以及他对突然成名的无能有关,几乎没有提到制作人协会对他的抵制呼吁的关键作用。1963年,制片人和明星演员之间的权力斗争非常明显。在这种权力斗争的框架内,制片人对卡纳发表了一份抵制声明,据称他打断了一部电影的拍摄。我把以卡纳自杀结束的一系列事件作为土耳其电影劳资纠纷的早期例子。这个案例表明,电影行业劳资纠纷的范围甚至包括那些通常被认为是特权阶层的明星演员。我认为,如果更公平的就业条件,如果生产者协会没有呼吁抵制,卡纳的自杀本来是可以避免的。为了研究这个案例,我使用了各种各样的历史文本,包括回忆录、自传、新闻报道、采访和评论。我要感谢Hakan Erkılıç, Mine Kasapoğlu Turhan, Ebru Özyurt, Bahar Emgin Şavk, g<s:1> rim Yılmaz和Alican Sekmeç在撰写本文期间所做的贡献。同时也感谢Gökçen Karanfil对稿件的精心制作和提出的宝贵建议;Necip Sarıcı,一位多才多艺的艺术家和收藏家,也是Kaner的朋友,分享了他的回忆;还要感谢西蒙·芒福德一如既往地孜孜不倦地校对这篇文章。披露声明作者报告无竞争利益需要申报。注1那时,“艺术家”一词专门用来指电影演员。关于电影的所有数字数据,我参考了土耳其电影研究中心(TSA)数据库https://www.tsa.org.tr/en/,该数据库于2022.2年9月22日访问。资源提到了这个协会的名称,如制片人协会(Prodüktörler Cemiyeti),土耳其制片人协会(t<s:1> rkiye Prodüktörler Birliği)和制片人协会(Prodüktörler Birliği)。为了保持一致,我将其简称为生产者协会Michael C. Nielsen,《早期美国电影工业的劳动力和组织》,《电影史》第2期,第2期。2 (1988): 121.4 Ronny Regev,在好莱坞工作:工作室系统如何将创造力转化为劳动(教堂山:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2018)Regev, 19.6关于ye<s:1> il<s:2> am及其制作模式的介绍性知识,见Dilek Kaya, ' ye<e:1> il<s:2> am Döneminde Film Sansürü: Bir mzakere ve m<e:1> cadele alanyi Olarak Film Sesi ', k<s:1> ltr <e:1> ve İletişim 20, no. 6。39 (2017): 12-34;翻拍、混音、剽窃:关于复制文化与土耳其流行电影,比利时,2014;萨瓦伊·阿尔斯兰:《土耳其电影:新的批判史》,第一版(牛津,纽约:牛津大学出版社,2011);艾哈迈德·格拉塔,“翻译现代性:土耳其电影的翻拍”,在亚洲电影院:一个Redar和指南,编辑迪米特里斯·埃莱夫特里奥蒂斯和加里·尼德姆(爱丁堡:爱丁堡大学出版社,2006年),242-54;Nezih Erdoğan和Deniz Göktürk,“土耳其电影”,中东和北非电影百科全书,奥利弗·利曼编辑(伦敦:劳特利奇,2001);7 . Erman Şener, ye<s:1> ilam ve t<e:1> rk sinemasyi (İstanbul: camera Yayınları, 1970)有关区域管理系统的概述,请参阅İlke Şanlıer y<s:1> ksel和Aydın Çam, ' Çukurova ' da 1960-1980 Dönemi电影院Pratiklerinin Özel Bir Örneği: Yörük Filmleri ', Sinecine:电影院Araştırmaları Dergisi 10号。2 (2019): 291-320, https://doi.org/10.32001/sinecine.639715;哈坎Erkılıç和雷杰普Ünal, ' t<s:1> rkiye Sinemasına Özgü Bir Üretim tarzyi Olarak Bölge İşletmeciliği: Adana Bölgesi İşletmeciliği Örnek Olay İncelemesi ', Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 5, no。3 (2018): 54-74;8 . nilg<e:1> n Abisel, ' t<e:1> rk Sinemasında Film Yapımı Üzerine Notlar ', in t<e:1> rk sinemaski Üzerine Yazılar,作者nilg<e:1> n Abisel(安卡拉:凤凰城Yayınevi, 2005)Serkan Şavk和Burak Doğu,“绘制ye<s:1> ilam:土耳其电影工业的关系方法”,CINEJ电影杂志9,no。[2] (2021): 199, https://cinej.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/cinej/article/view/425/662.9 Şener, ye<s:1> <s:1> <s:1>空间测量<e:1>, [j], 133-34。关于汇率,我指的是1969年的年平均值为1美元= 9土耳其里拉。10 Alim Şerif Onaran, ' trkiye ' de Sinemanın Örgütlenmesi Sorunu ', SBF Dergisi 29, no。3 (1974): 65-66.11 Altan ba<e:1> aran和M. Meryem kurtulmuek, ' t<s:1> rk Film endend<e:1> strisinde Çalışma İlişkileri ve sendikala<e:1> ma ', Çalışma ve Toplum, no. 65-66.11。1 (2016): 207;Derya Çetin, ' t<e:1> rk sinemasyi Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme sorunlaryi '(博士论文,安卡拉,安卡拉Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2010), 85.12 Çetin, ' t<e:1> rk sinemasyi Çalışanlarının Örgütlenme sorunlaryi ', 85。 1963年7月7日,这意味着合同是晚些时候签署的;Özön声称生产者协会在1963年8月13日要求其成员抵制Saner。然而,他并没有澄清这是官方决定还是其宣传的日期Özön, t<s:1> rk sinemaski Kronolojisi(1895-1966), 164.34在TSA数据库中,Suphi Kaner主演的最后4部电影的制作年份是1964年。我们可以假设这些是在抵制决定之前拍摄的,但在决定之后就被搁置了,只能在第二年完成根据审查委员会第1963/111号决定,电影的标题从邻里夜莺(Mahallenin Bülbülü)改为高大而有肌肉的Lad Ali Karadoğan和Semire Ruken Öztürk, sans<e:1> r Karar Defterleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme: t<s:1> rkiye 'de cinema sans<s:1> rkiye 'de nn<e:1> n Tarihi, 1932-1988, 2。Cilt 1963-1977(安卡拉:T.C. k<s:1> ltlt<e:1> r ve Turizm Bakanlığı, 2022), 50不确定这是制片人的要求还是审查委员会的要求,这两种情况都可能是如此。最有可能的是,与Kaner的协议是关于最初的标题。正如决定号所示,这部电影的制作始于1963年。欲获得影片的在线拷贝,请访问https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j_VmjFT0dA.36 ' Suphi Kaner ' in Ardından ', 4.37 Memduh Ün, Memduh Ün Filmlerini Anlatıyor,第二版(İstanbul: kabalcyi Yayınevi, 2009), 25;Atıf Yılmaz, Söylemek g<e:1> zeldir (İstanbul: Afa Yayınları, 1995), 160;@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Acar电影公司与演员Yusuf Sezgin签订的合同就是这种模棱两可的一个完美例子。这份合同只提到了电影的名字,没有提到剧本,故事,甚至电影的主题。“Acar Film Murat Köseoğlu Ile Yusuf Sezgin Arasında Mukavelename”,1976年10月14日,Serkan Şavk个人档案有关对埃罗尔·塔伊的采访摘录,他详细说明了他和他的孩子是如何被观众殴打的,请参阅Usta电影院Sanatçısı埃罗尔·塔伊·比尔Anısını Anlatıyor;t<s:1> rkan Şoray, Sinemam ve Ben (İstanbul: t<s:1> rkiye İş bankasyk<s:1> lt<e:1> r Yayınları, 2017), 67.40 ' İntiharından Önce ', 6.41 ' İntiharından Önce ', 6.42 ' İntiharından Önce ', 6;' Suphi Kaner ' in Ardından ', 4.43 ltfi Akad, Işıkla Karanlık Arasında (İstanbul: t<e:1> rkiye İş bankasyk<e:1> lt<e:1> r Yayınları, 2004), 308-9.44 ' Suphi Kaner ' in Ardından ', 4.45 ' Aktör Suphi Kaner d<e:1> n İntihar Etti ', Cumhuriyet, 1963年8月26日,1;C。, ' Şey…Buyurun Görün ', Milliyet, 1963年8月27日,1.46 ' Artist Suphi Kaner d<e:1> n İntihar Etti ', Milliyet, 1963年8月26日,1.47 Necip Sarıcı, Suphi Kaner的一位朋友和该过程的目击者之一告诉他,他不记得协会第二次决定的任何细节,6月做出的决定直到8月才进入公众舆论。在这方面,Sarıcı的证人支持Özön的年表,因为他将抵制的开始日期定为1963年8月13日。Özön, trk sinemaski Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.48 Özgüç, trk Sinemasında İntiharlar ve Cinayetler dosyasyi, 52;“艺术家Suphi Kaner d<e:1> n İntihar Etti”;' Aktör Suphi Kaner d<e:1> n İntihar Etti ';“Bir hik<e:1> yenin Sonu”,32.49“Suphi Kaner”in Cenaze Töreninde Hadise Çıktı”,Cumhuriyet, 1963年8月28日,1,5.50“Suphi Kaner”in Cenaze Töreninde Hadise Çıktı”,5.51“Kaner’i Sevenler”,Milliyet, 1963年8月29日,1;“Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu”,Cumhuriyet, 1963年8月29日,5;Özön, trk sinemaski Kronolojisi (1895-1966), 164.52 ' Kaner ' i Sevenler ', 1;' Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu ', 5.53 ' Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu ', 5.54 ' Kaner İçin Yapılan Basın Toplantısında Tartışmalar Oldu ', 5.55 T. Kakınç, ' Şimdi Ne Olacak?', Akis Haftalık akt<e:1> alite mecmuasyi, 1963年9月7日,30.56 Kakınç, 30;有关Sine所涵盖的职业组列表-İş,请参阅。' İşçi arkadaku[公告信]' (Sine-İş, 1963), https://phebusmuzayede.com/3594-sine-is-turk-sinema-iscileri-sendikasi-bildirisi-1963-tarihli-23-5x30-5cm.html.57 Kakınç, ' Şimdi Ne Olacak?', 30.58 ' Suphi Kaner ' in Cenaze Töreninde Hadise Çıktı ', 5.59 ' Olaylar ve İnsanlar ', Milliyet, 1963年9月4日,2.60 Seraceddin Zıddıoğlu, ' Suphi Kaner ' in Ölümüne Sebep olanlaryi yiyeecek ', Milliyet, 1963年9月1日,5.61 Özgüç, trk Film Yapımcıları Sözlüğü, 122;Turhan g<e:1> rkan, ' nezat Pesen ' in Beklenmedik Ölümü ', Cumhuriyet, 1973年2月14日,6.62关于基于死者信件的特殊精神分析,见Saffet Murat Tura, ' Şeyh ve Ayna ', Şeyh ve Arzu,第2版(İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2008).63达娜埃·克拉克,《好莱坞谈判:演员劳动的文化政治》(明尼阿波利斯:明尼苏达大学出版社,1995),第64页克拉克,11。serkan ŞavkSerkan Şavk于2014年获得Hacettepe大学历史系博士学位。2016-2017年,他在普林斯顿大学(Princeton University)攻读博士后,研究方向是数字历史。 他的研究兴趣包括土耳其电影史、数字人文、历史背景下的图像-空间-文化关系等。目前,他是两个研究项目的主要研究者:doyeilam:土耳其电影史的数据驱动、数字和开放方法:检查yeilam电影的风格特征(由TÜBİTAK土耳其科学技术研究委员会资助)和动物作为演员、载体和道具:土耳其电影史上的Metazoa(由伊兹密尔经济大学资助)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the history of the audio-visual mass media from c.1900 to the present. It explores the institutional and ideological contexts of film, radio and television, analyses the evidence produced by the mass media for historians and social scientists, and considers the impact of mass communications on political, social and cultural history. The needs of those engaged in research and teaching are served by scholarly articles, book reviews and by archival reports concerned with the preservation and availability of records. In addition the journal aims to provide a survey of developments in the teaching of history and social science courses which involve the use of film and broadcast materials. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television is the official journal of the International Association for Media and History (IAMHIST). All articles published in the journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editorial screening and the opinion of at least two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信