How Reproducible are the Results Gained with the Help of Deep Learning Methods in Biodiversity Research?

Waqas Ahmed, Vamsi Krishna Kommineni, Birgitta Koenig-ries, Sheeba Samuel
{"title":"How Reproducible are the Results Gained with the Help of Deep Learning Methods in Biodiversity Research?","authors":"Waqas Ahmed, Vamsi Krishna Kommineni, Birgitta Koenig-ries, Sheeba Samuel","doi":"10.3897/biss.7.112698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, deep learning methods in the biodiversity domain have gained significant attention due to their ability to handle the complexity of biological data and to make processing of large volumes of data feasible. However, these methods are not easy to interpret, so the opacity of new scientific research and discoveries makes them somewhat untrustworthy. Reproducibility is a fundamental aspect of scientific research, which enables validation and advancement of methods and results. If results obtained with the help of deep learning methods were reproducible, this would increase their trustworthiness. In this study, we investigate the state of reproducibility of deep learning methods in biodiversity research. We propose a pipeline to investigate the reproducibility of deep learning methods in the biodiversity domain. In our preliminary work, we systematically mined the existing literature from Google Scholar to identify publications that employ deep-learning techniques for biodiversity research. By carefully curating a dataset of relevant publications, we extracted reproducibility-related variables for 61 publications using a manual approach, such as the availability of datasets and code that serve as fundamental criteria for reproducibility assessment. Moreover, we extended our analysis to include advanced reproducibility variables, such as the specific deep learning methods, models, hyperparameters, etc., employed in the studies. To facilitate the automatic extraction of information from publications, we plan to leverage the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). By using the latest natural language processing (NLP) techniques, we aim to identify and extract relevant information pertaining to the reproducibility of deep learning methods in the biodiversity domain. This study seeks to contribute to the establishment of robust and reliable research practices. The findings will not only aid in validating existing methods but also guide the development of future approaches, ultimately fostering transparency and trust in the application of deep learning techniques in biodiversity research.","PeriodicalId":9011,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.112698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, deep learning methods in the biodiversity domain have gained significant attention due to their ability to handle the complexity of biological data and to make processing of large volumes of data feasible. However, these methods are not easy to interpret, so the opacity of new scientific research and discoveries makes them somewhat untrustworthy. Reproducibility is a fundamental aspect of scientific research, which enables validation and advancement of methods and results. If results obtained with the help of deep learning methods were reproducible, this would increase their trustworthiness. In this study, we investigate the state of reproducibility of deep learning methods in biodiversity research. We propose a pipeline to investigate the reproducibility of deep learning methods in the biodiversity domain. In our preliminary work, we systematically mined the existing literature from Google Scholar to identify publications that employ deep-learning techniques for biodiversity research. By carefully curating a dataset of relevant publications, we extracted reproducibility-related variables for 61 publications using a manual approach, such as the availability of datasets and code that serve as fundamental criteria for reproducibility assessment. Moreover, we extended our analysis to include advanced reproducibility variables, such as the specific deep learning methods, models, hyperparameters, etc., employed in the studies. To facilitate the automatic extraction of information from publications, we plan to leverage the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). By using the latest natural language processing (NLP) techniques, we aim to identify and extract relevant information pertaining to the reproducibility of deep learning methods in the biodiversity domain. This study seeks to contribute to the establishment of robust and reliable research practices. The findings will not only aid in validating existing methods but also guide the development of future approaches, ultimately fostering transparency and trust in the application of deep learning techniques in biodiversity research.
深度学习方法在生物多样性研究中的可重复性如何?
近年来,生物多样性领域的深度学习方法因其处理复杂生物数据的能力和处理大量数据的可行性而受到广泛关注。然而,这些方法并不容易解释,因此新的科学研究和发现的不透明性使它们在某种程度上不可信。可重复性是科学研究的一个基本方面,它使方法和结果的验证和进步成为可能。如果在深度学习方法的帮助下获得的结果是可重复的,这将增加它们的可信度。在这项研究中,我们调查了生物多样性研究中深度学习方法的可重复性状态。我们提出了一个管道来研究深度学习方法在生物多样性领域的可重复性。在我们的初步工作中,我们系统地挖掘了来自Google Scholar的现有文献,以确定采用深度学习技术进行生物多样性研究的出版物。通过仔细整理相关出版物的数据集,我们使用手动方法提取了61份出版物的可重复性相关变量,例如作为可重复性评估基本标准的数据集和代码的可用性。此外,我们扩展了我们的分析,包括高级可重复性变量,如研究中使用的特定深度学习方法、模型、超参数等。为了方便从出版物中自动提取信息,我们计划利用大型语言模型(llm)的功能。通过使用最新的自然语言处理(NLP)技术,我们的目标是识别和提取有关生物多样性领域深度学习方法可重复性的相关信息。本研究旨在为建立健全可靠的研究实践做出贡献。这些发现不仅有助于验证现有方法,还将指导未来方法的发展,最终促进深度学习技术在生物多样性研究中的应用的透明度和信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信