Leveraging AI in Biodiversity Informatics: Ethics, privacy, and broader impacts

Kristen "Kit" Lewers
{"title":"Leveraging AI in Biodiversity Informatics: Ethics, privacy, and broader impacts","authors":"Kristen \"Kit\" Lewers","doi":"10.3897/biss.7.112701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been heralded as a hero by some and rejected as a harbinger of destruction by others. While many in the community are excited about the functionality and promise AI brings to the field of biodiversity informatics, others have reservations regarding its widespread use. This talk will specifically address Large Language Models (LLMs) highlighting both the pros and cons of using LLMs. Like any tool, LLMs are neither good nor bad in and of themselves, but AI does need to be used within the appropriate scope of its ability and properly. Topics to be covered include model opacity (Franzoni 2023), privacy concerns (Wu et al. 2023), potential for algorithmic harm (Marjanovic et al. 2021) and model bias (Wang et al. 2020) in the context of generative AI along with how these topics differ from similar concerns when using traditional ML (Machine Learning) applications. Potential for implementation and training to ensure the most fair environment when leveraging AI and keeping FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reproducibility) principles in mind, will also be discussed. The topics covered will be mainly framed through the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) community, focusing on sociotechnical aspects and implications of implementing LLMs and generative AI. Finally, this talk will explore the potential applicability of TDWG standards pertaining to uniform prompting vocabulary when using generative AI and employing it as a tool for biodiversity informatics.","PeriodicalId":9011,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.112701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been heralded as a hero by some and rejected as a harbinger of destruction by others. While many in the community are excited about the functionality and promise AI brings to the field of biodiversity informatics, others have reservations regarding its widespread use. This talk will specifically address Large Language Models (LLMs) highlighting both the pros and cons of using LLMs. Like any tool, LLMs are neither good nor bad in and of themselves, but AI does need to be used within the appropriate scope of its ability and properly. Topics to be covered include model opacity (Franzoni 2023), privacy concerns (Wu et al. 2023), potential for algorithmic harm (Marjanovic et al. 2021) and model bias (Wang et al. 2020) in the context of generative AI along with how these topics differ from similar concerns when using traditional ML (Machine Learning) applications. Potential for implementation and training to ensure the most fair environment when leveraging AI and keeping FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reproducibility) principles in mind, will also be discussed. The topics covered will be mainly framed through the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) community, focusing on sociotechnical aspects and implications of implementing LLMs and generative AI. Finally, this talk will explore the potential applicability of TDWG standards pertaining to uniform prompting vocabulary when using generative AI and employing it as a tool for biodiversity informatics.
在生物多样性信息学中利用人工智能:伦理、隐私和更广泛的影响
人工智能(AI)被一些人奉为英雄,也被另一些人视为毁灭的先兆。虽然社区中的许多人对人工智能为生物多样性信息学领域带来的功能和前景感到兴奋,但其他人对其广泛使用持保留态度。这次演讲将特别讨论大型语言模型(llm),强调使用llm的优点和缺点。像任何工具一样,法学硕士本身没有好坏之分,但人工智能确实需要在其能力的适当范围内得到适当的使用。将要涵盖的主题包括生成式人工智能背景下的模型不透明度(Franzoni 2023)、隐私问题(Wu et al. 2023)、算法危害的可能性(Marjanovic et al. 2021)和模型偏差(Wang et al. 2020),以及这些主题与使用传统ML(机器学习)应用程序时的类似问题有何不同。还将讨论实施和培训的潜力,以确保在利用人工智能和保持公平(可寻性、可访问性、互操作性和可重复性)原则时最公平的环境。所涵盖的主题将主要通过生物多样性信息标准(TDWG)社区框架,重点关注社会技术方面和实施法学硕士和生成式人工智能的影响。最后,本演讲将探讨TDWG标准在使用生成式人工智能并将其作为生物多样性信息学工具时与统一提示词汇相关的潜在适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信