Crimes against Reproduction

Jesse Arseneault, Rosemary-Claire Collard
{"title":"Crimes against Reproduction","authors":"Jesse Arseneault, Rosemary-Claire Collard","doi":"10.52537/humanimalia.11727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Secular animal trials were coincident with witch trials across Europe from the 1200s–1700s, peaking between the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries. The trials’ similarity extends beyond simultaneity. Both forms of trials were preoccupied with what we call reproductive crimes: criminalized perceived deviance from reproductive norms that codified into an order facilitating the rise of capitalist modernity. In this paper we discuss secondary sources concerning the animal trials alongside feminist theories of reproduction, domestication, and anthropocentrism to suggest that animal trials, like witch trials, are sites of struggle over the domestication of reproduction. The animal trials are specifically a site of negotiation concerning the nonhuman world’s position within an ascendant domesticated reproductive order. In the trials, the domestication of reproduction thus entangles with the anthropocentric domestication of the nonhuman world. The empirical base of our analysis focuses on three arenas in which animals were incorporated into juridical structures as criminal subjects: bestiality, infanticide, and witch trials. The first two involved animals being tried directly in French courts, while the latter involved animals being implicated in British trials as witches’ familiars. Together, these appearances of animals provide an introductory window into how human–animal relations were 1) shaped by the reproductive anxieties and politics of the late Middle Ages and early modern period in these countries, and 2) marshalled towards the assembly of domesticated reproductive norms whose legacies persist into current frameworks of gendered and interspecies relationality. This imposition of a gendered order onto animality evidences the extent to which gendered systems of reproduction govern not only humans but also a wider terrain of life.","PeriodicalId":492016,"journal":{"name":"Humanimalia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanimalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.11727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Secular animal trials were coincident with witch trials across Europe from the 1200s–1700s, peaking between the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries. The trials’ similarity extends beyond simultaneity. Both forms of trials were preoccupied with what we call reproductive crimes: criminalized perceived deviance from reproductive norms that codified into an order facilitating the rise of capitalist modernity. In this paper we discuss secondary sources concerning the animal trials alongside feminist theories of reproduction, domestication, and anthropocentrism to suggest that animal trials, like witch trials, are sites of struggle over the domestication of reproduction. The animal trials are specifically a site of negotiation concerning the nonhuman world’s position within an ascendant domesticated reproductive order. In the trials, the domestication of reproduction thus entangles with the anthropocentric domestication of the nonhuman world. The empirical base of our analysis focuses on three arenas in which animals were incorporated into juridical structures as criminal subjects: bestiality, infanticide, and witch trials. The first two involved animals being tried directly in French courts, while the latter involved animals being implicated in British trials as witches’ familiars. Together, these appearances of animals provide an introductory window into how human–animal relations were 1) shaped by the reproductive anxieties and politics of the late Middle Ages and early modern period in these countries, and 2) marshalled towards the assembly of domesticated reproductive norms whose legacies persist into current frameworks of gendered and interspecies relationality. This imposition of a gendered order onto animality evidences the extent to which gendered systems of reproduction govern not only humans but also a wider terrain of life.
危害生殖罪
在欧洲,世俗动物试验与女巫审判同时进行,在12世纪到18世纪之间达到顶峰。这些试验的相似性超越了同时性。这两种形式的审判都专注于我们所说的生殖犯罪:将对生殖规范的感知偏差定为刑事犯罪,这些规范被编入促进资本主义现代性兴起的秩序。在本文中,我们讨论了有关动物试验的第二手资料,以及生殖、驯化和人类中心主义的女权主义理论,以表明动物试验,像女巫审判一样,是繁殖驯化的斗争场所。动物试验是关于非人类世界在一个上升的驯化生殖秩序中的地位的具体谈判场所。在试验中,繁殖的驯化因此与以人类为中心的非人类世界的驯化纠缠在一起。我们分析的经验基础集中在动物作为犯罪主体被纳入司法结构的三个领域:兽交、杀婴和女巫审判。前两个故事中,动物直接在法国法庭受审,而后一个故事中,动物在英国的审判中被认为是女巫的亲信。总之,这些动物的出现提供了一个介绍性的窗口,让我们了解人类与动物的关系是如何被这些国家中世纪晚期和现代早期的生殖焦虑和政治所塑造的,以及如何被引导到驯化的生殖规范的集合中,这些规范的遗产持续存在于当前的性别和物种间关系框架中。这种强加于动物身上的性别秩序证明了生殖性别系统不仅统治着人类,而且统治着更广泛的生命领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信