Effectiveness of the use of open-ended questions in student evaluation of teaching in an engineering degree

IF 2.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Lourdes E. Aznar-Mas, Lorena Atarés Huerta, Juan Antonio Marin-Garcia
{"title":"Effectiveness of the use of open-ended questions in student evaluation of teaching in an engineering degree","authors":"Lourdes E. Aznar-Mas, Lorena Atarés Huerta, Juan Antonio Marin-Garcia","doi":"10.3926/jiem.5620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of our research is to show the point of view of the members of the Board concerning advantages, disadvantages and effectiveness of open ended questions used as a complement to closed response questionnaires.Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, we will describe a pilot experience carried out at a Spanish public university where a short questionnaire with open ended questions was launched, and students were invited to comment on their perception of the teaching received.Findings: The response return rate (about 35%) was relatively high compared to other online closed response questionnaires delivered. Moreover, the students’ comments provided valuable information which made the members of the Board of the Engineering Degree chosen reflect. Their reflection was evidence based and led to initiatives and actions to improve the quality of teaching, as well as to get an extensive view of the Degree.Practical implications: Findings reveal that the information retrieved can also be used in multiple ways such as formative feedback or even for improvement of courses and instruction. Originality/value: Student evaluation of teaching is a powerful tool for continuous teaching improvement but the information provided by conventional closed response questionnaires may not be sufficient.","PeriodicalId":38526,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.5620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our research is to show the point of view of the members of the Board concerning advantages, disadvantages and effectiveness of open ended questions used as a complement to closed response questionnaires.Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, we will describe a pilot experience carried out at a Spanish public university where a short questionnaire with open ended questions was launched, and students were invited to comment on their perception of the teaching received.Findings: The response return rate (about 35%) was relatively high compared to other online closed response questionnaires delivered. Moreover, the students’ comments provided valuable information which made the members of the Board of the Engineering Degree chosen reflect. Their reflection was evidence based and led to initiatives and actions to improve the quality of teaching, as well as to get an extensive view of the Degree.Practical implications: Findings reveal that the information retrieved can also be used in multiple ways such as formative feedback or even for improvement of courses and instruction. Originality/value: Student evaluation of teaching is a powerful tool for continuous teaching improvement but the information provided by conventional closed response questionnaires may not be sufficient.
在工程学位学生评价教学中使用开放式问题的有效性
目的:我们研究的目的是展示董事会成员关于开放式问题作为封闭式问卷的补充的优点、缺点和有效性的观点。设计/方法/方法:在本文中,我们将描述在西班牙一所公立大学进行的试点经验,其中启动了一份带有开放式问题的简短问卷,并邀请学生评论他们对所接受教学的看法。调查结果:问卷的回复率(约35%)相对于其他在线封闭式问卷的回复率较高。此外,学生的意见提供了有价值的信息,这使得工程学位委员会的成员选择反映。他们的反思是基于证据的,并导致了提高教学质量的倡议和行动,以及对学位的广泛看法。实际意义:研究结果表明,检索到的信息也可以以多种方式使用,例如形成性反馈,甚至用于改进课程和教学。独创性/价值:学生对教学的评价是持续改进教学的有力工具,但传统的封闭式问卷所提供的信息可能不够充分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management
International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
17.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM) is an interdisciplinary international academic journal published quarterly. IJIEM serves researchers in the industrial engineering, manufacturing engineering and management fields. The major aims are: To collect and disseminate information on new and advanced developments in the field of industrial engineering and management; To encourage further progress in engineering and management methodology and applications; To cover the range of engineering and management development and usage in their use of managerial policies and strategies. Thus, IJIEM invites the submission of original, high quality, theoretical and application-oriented research; general surveys and critical reviews; educational or training articles including case studies, in the field of industrial engineering and management. The journal covers all aspects of industrial engineering and management, particularly: -Smart Manufacturing & Industry 4.0, -Production Systems, -Service Engineering, -Automation, Robotics and Mechatronics, -Information and Communication Systems, -ICT for Collaborative Manufacturing, -Quality, Maintenance and Logistics, -Safety and Reliability, -Organization and Human Resources, -Engineering Management, -Entrepreneurship and Innovation, -Project Management, -Marketing and Commerce, -Investment, Finance and Accounting, -Insurance Engineering and Management, -Media Engineering and Management, -Education and Practices in Industrial Engineering and Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信