Coring tools have an effect on lithification and physical properties of marine carbonate sediments

IF 1.6 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
David De Vleeschouwer, Theresa Nohl, Christian Schulbert, Or M. Bialik, Gerald Auer
{"title":"Coring tools have an effect on lithification and physical properties of marine carbonate sediments","authors":"David De Vleeschouwer, Theresa Nohl, Christian Schulbert, Or M. Bialik, Gerald Auer","doi":"10.5194/sd-32-43-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) JOIDES Resolution Science Operator typically uses an advanced piston corer (APC) in soft ooze and sediments and an extended core barrel (XCB) in firm sediments. The coring tool exchange typically occurs around the same depth in adjacent holes of the same site. However, during IODP Expedition 356, the coring tool switch occurred at different depths: IODP Sites U1463 and U1464 are marked by a stratigraphic interval (> 25 m thick) that was XCB cored in one hole and APC cored in other holes. Shipboard scientists remarked that APC-cored sediments were unlithified or partially lithified, while XCB-cored sediments were fully lithified. This difference in sedimentological description of the same formation seems to be an effect of coring technique. To provide further insight, we assessed the physical properties (bulk density, porosity, and P-wave velocity), downhole wireline logging data, scanning electron microscope (SEM) images, and micro-computed tomography (µCT) scans of those intervals. We find systematic differences between the different coring techniques. XCB cores are characterized by systematically lower bulk density, higher porosity, and higher P-wave velocity than APC cores. Downhole logging data suggest that the original P-wave velocity of the formation is better preserved in XCB cores, despite the typical “biscuit-and-gravy” core disturbance (i.e. well-preserved core fragments surrounded by squelched core material). In conjunction with SEM and µCT images, we conclude that the APC tool destroyed early lithification by breaking cements between individual grains. Moreover, µCT images reveal denser packing and smaller pore volumes in the APC cores. These sedimentary changes likely occur when the APC pressure wave passes through the sediment. The destruction of grain-to-grain cements provides an explanation for the significantly lower P-wave velocities in APC cores. Interestingly, the gravy sections in XCB drilled cores mimic the destruction of early lithification and reduction of pore volume. We conclude that APC remains the tool of choice for recovering soft sediments, especially for paleoclimate purposes. However, for the study of lithification, XCB biscuits provide a more representative image of the formation. For the study of early diagenesis, further studies are required to ascertain the preservation of key sedimentary features using existing and new drilling tools.","PeriodicalId":51840,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Drilling","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Drilling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-32-43-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. The International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) JOIDES Resolution Science Operator typically uses an advanced piston corer (APC) in soft ooze and sediments and an extended core barrel (XCB) in firm sediments. The coring tool exchange typically occurs around the same depth in adjacent holes of the same site. However, during IODP Expedition 356, the coring tool switch occurred at different depths: IODP Sites U1463 and U1464 are marked by a stratigraphic interval (> 25 m thick) that was XCB cored in one hole and APC cored in other holes. Shipboard scientists remarked that APC-cored sediments were unlithified or partially lithified, while XCB-cored sediments were fully lithified. This difference in sedimentological description of the same formation seems to be an effect of coring technique. To provide further insight, we assessed the physical properties (bulk density, porosity, and P-wave velocity), downhole wireline logging data, scanning electron microscope (SEM) images, and micro-computed tomography (µCT) scans of those intervals. We find systematic differences between the different coring techniques. XCB cores are characterized by systematically lower bulk density, higher porosity, and higher P-wave velocity than APC cores. Downhole logging data suggest that the original P-wave velocity of the formation is better preserved in XCB cores, despite the typical “biscuit-and-gravy” core disturbance (i.e. well-preserved core fragments surrounded by squelched core material). In conjunction with SEM and µCT images, we conclude that the APC tool destroyed early lithification by breaking cements between individual grains. Moreover, µCT images reveal denser packing and smaller pore volumes in the APC cores. These sedimentary changes likely occur when the APC pressure wave passes through the sediment. The destruction of grain-to-grain cements provides an explanation for the significantly lower P-wave velocities in APC cores. Interestingly, the gravy sections in XCB drilled cores mimic the destruction of early lithification and reduction of pore volume. We conclude that APC remains the tool of choice for recovering soft sediments, especially for paleoclimate purposes. However, for the study of lithification, XCB biscuits provide a more representative image of the formation. For the study of early diagenesis, further studies are required to ascertain the preservation of key sedimentary features using existing and new drilling tools.
取心工具对海相碳酸盐沉积物的岩化作用和物性有影响
摘要国际海洋发现计划(IODP) JOIDES Resolution Science Operator通常在软泥和沉积物中使用先进的活塞盖(APC),在坚硬的沉积物中使用加长的岩心桶(XCB)。取心工具的交换通常发生在同一位置相邻孔的相同深度附近。然而,在IODP 356考察期间,取心工具的切换发生在不同的深度:IODP地点U1463和U1464以地层间隔(>25 m厚),其中一个孔采用XCB包芯,其他孔采用APC包芯。船上的科学家指出,apc取心的沉积物未岩化或部分岩化,而xcb取心的沉积物则完全岩化。同一地层在沉积学描述上的这种差异似乎是取心技术的影响。为了进一步了解储层,我们评估了储层的物理性质(体积密度、孔隙度和纵波速度)、井下电缆测井数据、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像和微计算机断层扫描(µCT)扫描结果。我们发现不同取心技术之间存在系统差异。与APC岩心相比,XCB岩心总体上具有体积密度更低、孔隙度更高、纵波速度更快的特点。井下测井数据表明,尽管存在典型的“饼干-肉汁”岩心扰动(即被压缩的岩心物质包围着保存完好的岩心碎片),但XCB岩心中地层的原始纵波速度得到了更好的保存。结合SEM和微CT图像,我们得出结论,APC工具通过破坏单个颗粒之间的胶结物来破坏早期岩化作用。此外,微CT图像显示APC岩心的充填密度更大,孔隙体积更小。这些沉积变化可能发生在APC压力波穿过沉积物时。颗粒间胶结物的破坏解释了APC岩心中显著较低的纵波速度。有趣的是,XCB岩心的肉汁剖面模拟了早期岩化的破坏和孔隙体积的减小。我们得出结论,APC仍然是恢复软沉积物的首选工具,特别是用于古气候目的。然而,对于岩化作用的研究,XCB饼干提供了更有代表性的地层图像。对于早期成岩作用的研究,需要利用现有和新的钻井工具进一步研究以确定关键沉积特征的保存情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Drilling
Scientific Drilling GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信