Accessibility of cultural heritage

Calogero Bellanca, Susana Mora Alonso-Muñoyerro, Cecilia Antonini Lanari
{"title":"Accessibility of cultural heritage","authors":"Calogero Bellanca, Susana Mora Alonso-Muñoyerro, Cecilia Antonini Lanari","doi":"10.35784/odk.2941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accessibility is a fondamental point to enjoy cultural heritage. An operative aspect which with different theoretical methodologies and practical projects can reach critical-conservative solutions.
 A first step may be to conserve the different stratification, all historic periods, and the impact in the surroundings for single preexistences and archeological sites.
 For archeological sites, it is necessary not to forget historical solutions which contributed to inspire the Venice Charter.
 A second step is an urban dimension for the accessibility in the historic centres and the pedestrian itineraries.
 To summarize the values Riegl, as we know, divided them in two main groups: the memorial values as age value, historical value and intended memorial value; and the present day values as use value, art value, newness value and relative art value.
 And when there is a conflict between use value and historical value, the treatment of a monument should, above all, take into account the age value.
 This will be a principal for the guidelines in the problem of accessibility.
 Many of these problems can be resolve with an appropriate design.
 This reintegration of the image even for the urban restoration than for the conservation of environment.
 In this paper, we want to present different ways of making the cultural heritage accessible to everyone, not only the obvious priorities of physical accessibility, but also accessibility in the form of understanding and experienced.
","PeriodicalId":497820,"journal":{"name":"Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.2941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accessibility is a fondamental point to enjoy cultural heritage. An operative aspect which with different theoretical methodologies and practical projects can reach critical-conservative solutions. A first step may be to conserve the different stratification, all historic periods, and the impact in the surroundings for single preexistences and archeological sites. For archeological sites, it is necessary not to forget historical solutions which contributed to inspire the Venice Charter. A second step is an urban dimension for the accessibility in the historic centres and the pedestrian itineraries. To summarize the values Riegl, as we know, divided them in two main groups: the memorial values as age value, historical value and intended memorial value; and the present day values as use value, art value, newness value and relative art value. And when there is a conflict between use value and historical value, the treatment of a monument should, above all, take into account the age value. This will be a principal for the guidelines in the problem of accessibility. Many of these problems can be resolve with an appropriate design. This reintegration of the image even for the urban restoration than for the conservation of environment. In this paper, we want to present different ways of making the cultural heritage accessible to everyone, not only the obvious priorities of physical accessibility, but also accessibility in the form of understanding and experienced.
文化遗产的可及性
无障碍是享受文化遗产的一个基本点。用不同的理论方法和实际项目可以达到临界保守解决方案的操作方面。 第一步可能是保存不同的分层,所有的历史时期,以及对单一的前世和考古遗址的周围环境的影响。对于考古遗址,有必要不要忘记历史上的解决方案,这些解决方案有助于激发威尼斯宪章。 第二步是历史中心和步行路线的可达性的城市维度。 为了总结价值,我们知道,Riegl将其分为两大类:作为时代价值、历史价值和预期纪念价值的纪念价值;当代价值为使用价值、艺术价值、新颖性价值和相对艺术价值。 而当使用价值与历史价值发生冲突时,对古迹的处理首先要考虑到它的年代价值。 这将是可访问性问题指导方针的主要内容。 许多问题都可以通过适当的设计来解决。 这种形象的重新整合甚至是为了城市的恢复而不是为了环境的保护。 在本文中,我们希望提出不同的方式,使文化遗产对每个人都可访问,不仅是物理可达性的明显优先,而且是理解和体验形式的可达性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信