Complete Left Bundle Branch Block in Acute Coronary Syndrome with ST Segment Elevation: Epidemiological Features

Hanane ZOUZOU
{"title":"Complete Left Bundle Branch Block in Acute Coronary Syndrome with ST Segment Elevation: Epidemiological Features","authors":"Hanane ZOUZOU","doi":"10.18535/cmhrj.v3i6.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Complete left bundle branch in acute coronary syndrome with ST segment elevation is not common, but known as a sign of poor prognosis. Several international studies had reported its incidence and related mortality, but its epidemiological data is lacking in Algeria. Aims: The main objective of our study is the determination of the frequency of complete left bundle branch block in acute coronary syndrome with ST segment elevation, the secondary objective was the analysis of its predictive factors and related mortality. Methods and materials: In this prospective study, conducted in the cardiology department of Hussein Dey hospital (Algiers-Algeria), 467 patients with acute coronary syndrome with elevated ST segment (87 women and 380 men) were enrolled between 28 February 2014 and 16 July 2015. The average age is 60 ± 13 years; at admission, a Holter recorder was attached for continuous ECG monitoring during 48 hours. Kruskal’s ANNOVA or H tests were used for comparison of quantitative variables, χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, were used for qualitative variables, all tests were performed with 1st species risk of 5%. Results: The frequency of complete left bundle brunch block is 1.7 % (8 patients), CI 95%: [0.5%-2.9%], multivariate analysis identified the two independent predictors: diabetes type 1, and Angiotensin Receptor-Blockers as current treatment. Despite the risk of mortality expressed by Hazard Ration (HR) is 4.7, but remains not significant: CI95%: [0.62-36], p = 0.134; however, the risk of ventricular fibrillation occurrence is high, with relative risk (RR) at 7.17, CI 95 %: [2.70-19.03], p = 0.007. Conclusion: Complete left bundle brunch block is not common in acute coronary syndrome with elevated ST segment, its predictive factors according to our study are: Diabetes type 1 and Angiotensin Receptor-Blockers as current treatment. The high-risk mortality in the left bundle brunch block group isn’t significant; however the risk of ventricular fibrillation occurrence is high.","PeriodicalId":500154,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine And Health Research Journal","volume":"53 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine And Health Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18535/cmhrj.v3i6.272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complete left bundle branch in acute coronary syndrome with ST segment elevation is not common, but known as a sign of poor prognosis. Several international studies had reported its incidence and related mortality, but its epidemiological data is lacking in Algeria. Aims: The main objective of our study is the determination of the frequency of complete left bundle branch block in acute coronary syndrome with ST segment elevation, the secondary objective was the analysis of its predictive factors and related mortality. Methods and materials: In this prospective study, conducted in the cardiology department of Hussein Dey hospital (Algiers-Algeria), 467 patients with acute coronary syndrome with elevated ST segment (87 women and 380 men) were enrolled between 28 February 2014 and 16 July 2015. The average age is 60 ± 13 years; at admission, a Holter recorder was attached for continuous ECG monitoring during 48 hours. Kruskal’s ANNOVA or H tests were used for comparison of quantitative variables, χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, were used for qualitative variables, all tests were performed with 1st species risk of 5%. Results: The frequency of complete left bundle brunch block is 1.7 % (8 patients), CI 95%: [0.5%-2.9%], multivariate analysis identified the two independent predictors: diabetes type 1, and Angiotensin Receptor-Blockers as current treatment. Despite the risk of mortality expressed by Hazard Ration (HR) is 4.7, but remains not significant: CI95%: [0.62-36], p = 0.134; however, the risk of ventricular fibrillation occurrence is high, with relative risk (RR) at 7.17, CI 95 %: [2.70-19.03], p = 0.007. Conclusion: Complete left bundle brunch block is not common in acute coronary syndrome with elevated ST segment, its predictive factors according to our study are: Diabetes type 1 and Angiotensin Receptor-Blockers as current treatment. The high-risk mortality in the left bundle brunch block group isn’t significant; however the risk of ventricular fibrillation occurrence is high.
ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征完全性左束支阻滞:流行病学特征
背景:急性冠状动脉综合征伴ST段抬高的完全左束支并不常见,但被认为是预后不良的标志。若干国际研究报告了其发病率和相关死亡率,但阿尔及利亚缺乏其流行病学数据。目的:本研究的主要目的是确定ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征发生完全左束支传导阻滞的频率,次要目的是分析其预测因素及相关死亡率。方法和材料:在这项前瞻性研究中,Hussein Dey医院(阿尔及利亚阿尔及尔)心内科在2014年2月28日至2015年7月16日期间招募了467例ST段升高的急性冠状动脉综合征患者(87名女性和380名男性)。平均年龄60±13岁;入院时使用动态心电图仪连续监测48小时。定量变量比较采用Kruskal anova或H检验,定性变量比较采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验,所有检验均采用第一种风险为5%。结果:完全左束阻断的频率为1.7%(8例),CI 95%:[0.5%-2.9%],多因素分析确定了两个独立的预测因素:1型糖尿病和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂是目前的治疗方法。尽管用Hazard ratio (HR)表示的死亡风险为4.7,但仍不显著:CI95%: [0.62-36], p = 0.134;然而,发生心室颤动的风险较高,相对危险度(RR)为7.17,CI 95%: [2.70-19.03], p = 0.007。结论:完全左束阻滞在ST段升高的急性冠状动脉综合征中并不常见,其预测因素为:1型糖尿病和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂作为目前的治疗手段。左束早午餐阻滞组的高危死亡率不显著;然而,发生心室颤动的风险很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信