Comparison Analysis of Financial Performance of BUMN and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks with RGEC Method

Hafiz Santak Taram, Isfandayani Isfandayani
{"title":"Comparison Analysis of Financial Performance of BUMN and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks with RGEC Method","authors":"Hafiz Santak Taram, Isfandayani Isfandayani","doi":"10.21111/tijarah.v8i2.7301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyze the comparison of the financial performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks on the variables of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital (RGEC) for the 2017-2020 period represented by the ratio of NPF, FDR, BOPO, GCG, ROA, ROE, and CAR. The results of this research show that of the 7 ratios analyzed, there are 5 ratios with significant differences between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks during the 2017-2020 period, namely FDR, BOPO, GCG, ROA, and ROE. While the NPF ratio, CAR, and RGEC Composite Rating there is no significant difference between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks during the 2017-2020 period. The last analysis on the consolidated financial performance assessment of all RGEC variables shows that the performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks is not better than the performance of Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks where the average composite value for 4 years is the performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks (80%), smaller than the composite value of the performance of Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks (86%).","PeriodicalId":31654,"journal":{"name":"Al Tijarah","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Tijarah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21111/tijarah.v8i2.7301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the comparison of the financial performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks on the variables of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital (RGEC) for the 2017-2020 period represented by the ratio of NPF, FDR, BOPO, GCG, ROA, ROE, and CAR. The results of this research show that of the 7 ratios analyzed, there are 5 ratios with significant differences between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks during the 2017-2020 period, namely FDR, BOPO, GCG, ROA, and ROE. While the NPF ratio, CAR, and RGEC Composite Rating there is no significant difference between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks during the 2017-2020 period. The last analysis on the consolidated financial performance assessment of all RGEC variables shows that the performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks is not better than the performance of Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks where the average composite value for 4 years is the performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks (80%), smaller than the composite value of the performance of Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks (86%).
基于RGEC方法的城市伊斯兰商业银行与非城市伊斯兰商业银行财务绩效比较分析
本研究旨在分析以NPF、FDR、BOPO、GCG、ROA、ROE和CAR比率为代表的2017-2020年期间的风险概况、良好公司治理、收益和资本(RGEC)变量对村镇伊斯兰商业银行和非村镇伊斯兰商业银行财务绩效的比较。本研究结果表明,在分析的7个比率中,有5个比率在2017-2020年期间,BUMN伊斯兰商业银行与非BUMN伊斯兰商业银行的财务绩效之间存在显著差异,即FDR、BOPO、GCG、ROA和ROE。而在NPF比率、CAR和RGEC综合评级方面,2017-2020年期间,北方伊斯兰商业银行与非北方伊斯兰商业银行的财务业绩没有显著差异。最后对所有RGEC变量的综合财务绩效评估进行分析,发现BUMN伊斯兰商业银行的绩效并不比Non - BUMN伊斯兰商业银行的绩效好,其中4年的平均综合值为BUMN伊斯兰商业银行的绩效(80%),小于Non - BUMN伊斯兰商业银行的绩效综合值(86%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书