A Comparative Analysis of the Response-Tracking Techniques in Aerospace Dynamic Systems Using Modal Participation Factors

IF 12.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Michelle Guzman Nieto, Sandeep Suresh Babu, Mostafa S. A. ElSayed, Abdel-Hamid Ismail Mourad
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Response-Tracking Techniques in Aerospace Dynamic Systems Using Modal Participation Factors","authors":"Michelle Guzman Nieto, Sandeep Suresh Babu, Mostafa S. A. ElSayed, Abdel-Hamid Ismail Mourad","doi":"10.3390/applmech4040053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical structural systems are subject to multiple dynamic disturbances during service. While several possible scenarios can be examined to determine their design loading conditions, only a relatively small set of such scenarios is considered critical. Therefore, only such particular deterministic set of critical load cases is commonly employed for the structural design and optimization. Nevertheless, during the design and optimization stages, the mass and stiffness distributions of such assemblies vary, and, in consequence, their dynamic response also varies. Thus, it is important to consider the variations in the dynamic loading conditions during the design-and-optimization cycles. This paper studies the modal participation factors at length and proposes an alternative to the current point-wise treatment of the dynamic equations of motion of flexible bodies during design optimization. First, the most relevant-to-structural-dynamics definitions available in the literature are reviewed in depth. Second, the analysis of those definitions that have the potential to be adopted as point-wise constraint equations during structural optimization is extended. Finally, a proof of concept is presented to demonstrate the usability of each definition, followed by a case study in which the potential advantages of the proposed extended analysis are shown.","PeriodicalId":8048,"journal":{"name":"Applied Mechanics Reviews","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Mechanics Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech4040053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanical structural systems are subject to multiple dynamic disturbances during service. While several possible scenarios can be examined to determine their design loading conditions, only a relatively small set of such scenarios is considered critical. Therefore, only such particular deterministic set of critical load cases is commonly employed for the structural design and optimization. Nevertheless, during the design and optimization stages, the mass and stiffness distributions of such assemblies vary, and, in consequence, their dynamic response also varies. Thus, it is important to consider the variations in the dynamic loading conditions during the design-and-optimization cycles. This paper studies the modal participation factors at length and proposes an alternative to the current point-wise treatment of the dynamic equations of motion of flexible bodies during design optimization. First, the most relevant-to-structural-dynamics definitions available in the literature are reviewed in depth. Second, the analysis of those definitions that have the potential to be adopted as point-wise constraint equations during structural optimization is extended. Finally, a proof of concept is presented to demonstrate the usability of each definition, followed by a case study in which the potential advantages of the proposed extended analysis are shown.
基于模态参与因子的航空动力系统响应跟踪技术比较分析
机械结构系统在使用过程中会受到多种动态干扰。虽然可以检查几种可能的场景以确定其设计加载条件,但只有相对较小的场景集被认为是关键的。因此,结构设计和优化通常只采用这种特定的确定性临界工况集。然而,在设计和优化阶段,这些组件的质量和刚度分布会发生变化,因此,它们的动态响应也会发生变化。因此,在设计和优化周期中考虑动载荷条件的变化是很重要的。本文对模态参与因子进行了详细的研究,并提出了一种在设计优化过程中替代现有的逐点处理柔性体动力学方程的方法。首先,对文献中最相关的结构动力学定义进行了深入的回顾。其次,对那些在结构优化过程中有可能被采用为逐点约束方程的定义进行了分析。最后,提出了一个概念证明,以展示每个定义的可用性,然后是一个案例研究,其中显示了所提出的扩展分析的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.20
自引率
0.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Mechanics Reviews (AMR) is an international review journal that serves as a premier venue for dissemination of material across all subdisciplines of applied mechanics and engineering science, including fluid and solid mechanics, heat transfer, dynamics and vibration, and applications.AMR provides an archival repository for state-of-the-art and retrospective survey articles and reviews of research areas and curricular developments. The journal invites commentary on research and education policy in different countries. The journal also invites original tutorial and educational material in applied mechanics targeting non-specialist audiences, including undergraduate and K-12 students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信