Hazel Easthope, Laura Crommelin, Charles Gillon, Simon Pinnegar, Kristian Ruming, Sha Liu
{"title":"Redeveloping the compact city: the challenges of strata collective sales","authors":"Hazel Easthope, Laura Crommelin, Charles Gillon, Simon Pinnegar, Kristian Ruming, Sha Liu","doi":"10.1108/jppel-04-2023-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose High-density development requires large land parcels, but fragmented land ownership can impede redevelopment. While earlier compact city development in Sydney occurred on large-scale brownfield sites, redeveloping and re-amalgamating older strata-titled properties is now integral to further densification. The purpose of this study is to examine collective sales activity in one Sydney suburb where multiple strata-titled redevelopments and re-amalgamations have been attempted. The authors explore how owners navigate the process of selling collectively, focusing on their experience of legislation introduced to facilitate this process, the Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 [New South Wales (NSW)]. Design/methodology/approach By reviewing sales listings, development applications and media coverage, and interviewing owners, lawyers and estate agents, the authors map out collective sale activity in a case study area in Sydney’s northwest. Findings Strata collective sales are slow and difficult to complete, even when planning and market drivers align. Owners find the Strata Scheme Development Act 2015 (NSW) difficult to navigate and it has not prevented strategic blocking attempts by competing developers. The long timelines required to organise collective sales can result in failure if the market shifts in the interim. Nonetheless, owners remain interested in selling collectively. Originality/value This case study is important for understanding the barriers to redevelopment to achieve a more compact city. It highlights lessons for other jurisdictions considering similar legislative changes. It also suggests that legislative change alone is insufficient to resolve the planning challenges created by hyper-fragmentation of land through strata-title development.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jppel-04-2023-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose High-density development requires large land parcels, but fragmented land ownership can impede redevelopment. While earlier compact city development in Sydney occurred on large-scale brownfield sites, redeveloping and re-amalgamating older strata-titled properties is now integral to further densification. The purpose of this study is to examine collective sales activity in one Sydney suburb where multiple strata-titled redevelopments and re-amalgamations have been attempted. The authors explore how owners navigate the process of selling collectively, focusing on their experience of legislation introduced to facilitate this process, the Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 [New South Wales (NSW)]. Design/methodology/approach By reviewing sales listings, development applications and media coverage, and interviewing owners, lawyers and estate agents, the authors map out collective sale activity in a case study area in Sydney’s northwest. Findings Strata collective sales are slow and difficult to complete, even when planning and market drivers align. Owners find the Strata Scheme Development Act 2015 (NSW) difficult to navigate and it has not prevented strategic blocking attempts by competing developers. The long timelines required to organise collective sales can result in failure if the market shifts in the interim. Nonetheless, owners remain interested in selling collectively. Originality/value This case study is important for understanding the barriers to redevelopment to achieve a more compact city. It highlights lessons for other jurisdictions considering similar legislative changes. It also suggests that legislative change alone is insufficient to resolve the planning challenges created by hyper-fragmentation of land through strata-title development.
高密度发展需要大片土地,但分散的土地所有权会阻碍重建。虽然悉尼早期的紧凑型城市开发发生在大规模的棕地,但重新开发和重新合并旧的地层产权现在是进一步致密化不可或缺的一部分。本研究的目的是研究悉尼郊区的集体销售活动,该地区尝试了多个分层的重新开发和重新合并。作者探讨了业主如何在集体销售过程中进行导航,重点介绍了他们为促进这一过程而引入的立法经验,即《2015年分层计划发展法案》[新南威尔士州(NSW)]。通过审查销售清单、开发申请和媒体报道,并采访业主、律师和房地产经纪人,作者在悉尼西北部的一个案例研究区域绘制了集体销售活动。Strata集体销售缓慢且难以完成,即使在计划和市场驱动因素一致的情况下也是如此。业主发现《2015年Strata Scheme Development Act》(NSW)难以驾驭,而且它并没有阻止竞争开发商的战略封锁企图。如果市场在此期间发生变化,组织集体出售所需的漫长时间可能导致失败。尽管如此,业主们仍然对集体出售感兴趣。这个案例研究对于理解重建的障碍以实现更紧凑的城市非常重要。它为其他考虑进行类似立法改革的司法管辖区提供了经验教训。它还表明,仅靠立法改革不足以解决通过分层产权开发造成的土地过度碎片化所带来的规划挑战。