Pharmacists in Australian general practice: Discussion of the findings of an evaluation from 2016 to 2021

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Louise S. Deeks BSc (Hons), PGDip, PGCert, Mark Naunton BPharm (Hons), PhD, Gregory M. Peterson BPharm (Hons), MBA, PhD, Thilini Sudeshika BPharm (Hons), PGDipToxicology, MPhil, Christopher Freeman BPharm, GDipClinPharm, PhD, Ravi Sharma MPharm (Hons), MSc, PGCert, Stacy Leavens BA, MA, Sam Kosari BPharm (Hons), PhD
{"title":"Pharmacists in Australian general practice: Discussion of the findings of an evaluation from 2016 to 2021","authors":"Louise S. Deeks BSc (Hons), PGDip, PGCert,&nbsp;Mark Naunton BPharm (Hons), PhD,&nbsp;Gregory M. Peterson BPharm (Hons), MBA, PhD,&nbsp;Thilini Sudeshika BPharm (Hons), PGDipToxicology, MPhil,&nbsp;Christopher Freeman BPharm, GDipClinPharm, PhD,&nbsp;Ravi Sharma MPharm (Hons), MSc, PGCert,&nbsp;Stacy Leavens BA, MA,&nbsp;Sam Kosari BPharm (Hons), PhD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pharmacists embedded in general practice can improve medicines optimisation and patient safety, but Australia has been slower to adopt and fund this model than other comparable countries. Over the last decade there have been various local programs integrating pharmacists in general practice across Australia. This article summarises the results of an evaluation in Canberra from 2016–2021. Pharmacists predominantly conducted clinical activities, including medication reviews and clinical audits. General practitioner (GP) acceptance and implementation of medication review recommendations was high (75%). General practice pharmacists were able to achieve positive clinical outcomes in asthma and smoking cessation. Surveys and interviews identified that the general practice pharmacist role was welcomed by patients, GPs, and other healthcare professionals. Patient satisfaction was very high, with patients supporting the expansion of this pharmacy service. Collaboration between the pharmacists and other healthcare professionals was high. Some pharmacists left employment in general practice after less than a year. Introducing a clear job description could be beneficial in retaining pharmacists, improving trust and working relationships, and enhancing collaboration. The majority of clinical activities conducted by the pharmacists had the potential to improve patient care and decrease healthcare costs. Apart from healthcare savings, benefit–cost ratios of income generated and costs reduced by pharmacists when compared to salaries suggested that pharmacists may be cost-beneficial in some scenarios. Absence of funding for this model of care remains a barrier to wider adoption in Australia and needs addressing. This study was approved by the University of Canberra Human Research Ethics Committee (Project number: 15–235) and funded under the Primary Health Network Program (Grant number: 25097479).</p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1878","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmacists embedded in general practice can improve medicines optimisation and patient safety, but Australia has been slower to adopt and fund this model than other comparable countries. Over the last decade there have been various local programs integrating pharmacists in general practice across Australia. This article summarises the results of an evaluation in Canberra from 2016–2021. Pharmacists predominantly conducted clinical activities, including medication reviews and clinical audits. General practitioner (GP) acceptance and implementation of medication review recommendations was high (75%). General practice pharmacists were able to achieve positive clinical outcomes in asthma and smoking cessation. Surveys and interviews identified that the general practice pharmacist role was welcomed by patients, GPs, and other healthcare professionals. Patient satisfaction was very high, with patients supporting the expansion of this pharmacy service. Collaboration between the pharmacists and other healthcare professionals was high. Some pharmacists left employment in general practice after less than a year. Introducing a clear job description could be beneficial in retaining pharmacists, improving trust and working relationships, and enhancing collaboration. The majority of clinical activities conducted by the pharmacists had the potential to improve patient care and decrease healthcare costs. Apart from healthcare savings, benefit–cost ratios of income generated and costs reduced by pharmacists when compared to salaries suggested that pharmacists may be cost-beneficial in some scenarios. Absence of funding for this model of care remains a barrier to wider adoption in Australia and needs addressing. This study was approved by the University of Canberra Human Research Ethics Committee (Project number: 15–235) and funded under the Primary Health Network Program (Grant number: 25097479).

Abstract Image

澳大利亚全科医师药剂师:2016年至2021年评估结果的讨论
融入全科实践的药剂师可以改善药物优化和患者安全,但与其他可比国家相比,澳大利亚采用和资助这种模式的速度较慢。在过去的十年里,有各种各样的地方项目将药剂师整合到澳大利亚的一般实践中。本文总结了2016-2021年在堪培拉进行的评估结果。药剂师主要进行临床活动,包括药物审查和临床审计。全科医生(GP)接受和执行药物审查建议的比例很高(75%)。全科执业药师能够在哮喘和戒烟方面取得积极的临床结果。调查和访谈表明,普通执业药师的角色受到患者、全科医生和其他医疗保健专业人员的欢迎。患者满意度非常高,患者支持扩大药房服务。药剂师和其他医疗专业人员之间的合作程度很高。一些药剂师在不到一年的时间里就离开了全科诊所。引入明确的工作描述可能有利于留住药剂师,改善信任和工作关系,并加强合作。药剂师进行的大多数临床活动都有可能改善患者护理并降低医疗保健费用。除了节省医疗费用外,与工资相比,药剂师产生的收入和减少的费用的效益成本比表明,药剂师在某些情况下可能具有成本效益。这种护理模式缺乏资金仍然是澳大利亚广泛采用这种模式的障碍,需要加以解决。这项研究由堪培拉大学人类研究伦理委员会批准(项目编号:15-235),并由初级卫生网络计划(资助编号:25097479)资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信