Deploying a spreadsheet tool for early economic value assessment of medical device innovations with healthcare decision makers

M. Craven, Steven Morgan, J. Crowe, Bo Lu
{"title":"Deploying a spreadsheet tool for early economic value assessment of medical device innovations with healthcare decision makers","authors":"M. Craven, Steven Morgan, J. Crowe, Bo Lu","doi":"10.1179/mmh.2009.2.3.278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Early-stage evaluation of medical device innovations is important for both healthcare decision makers and manufacturers. Basic cost-effectiveness analysis is therefore becoming increasingly necessary outside the usual base of health technology assessment specialists. This paper describes a spreadsheet tool for both healthcare delivery professionals and healthcare technology innovators who are non-experts in health economics. Via a simplified decision-tree model, the tool can be used to compare costs and patient benefit for a new device-related procedure versus standard care with an incumbent device or other alternative. To be broadly comparable across treatments, the tool uses the standard quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) measure of clinical outcome. The tool helps the innovator/manufacturer focus on development needs in order to fill gaps in the input data and so further strengthen their case from a health economics perspective. The results show that mapping device-related innovations to the tool is achievable using expected costs, outcomes data from the literature and estimated ranges for unknown input data. While the result of a simplified analysis is not expected to be definitive, the process of reasoning is illuminating for the parties involved, enabling innovators to articulate the benefits of their innovations and for all parties to highlight gaps in the data and evidence required to take the innovation forward.","PeriodicalId":354315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/mmh.2009.2.3.278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract Early-stage evaluation of medical device innovations is important for both healthcare decision makers and manufacturers. Basic cost-effectiveness analysis is therefore becoming increasingly necessary outside the usual base of health technology assessment specialists. This paper describes a spreadsheet tool for both healthcare delivery professionals and healthcare technology innovators who are non-experts in health economics. Via a simplified decision-tree model, the tool can be used to compare costs and patient benefit for a new device-related procedure versus standard care with an incumbent device or other alternative. To be broadly comparable across treatments, the tool uses the standard quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) measure of clinical outcome. The tool helps the innovator/manufacturer focus on development needs in order to fill gaps in the input data and so further strengthen their case from a health economics perspective. The results show that mapping device-related innovations to the tool is achievable using expected costs, outcomes data from the literature and estimated ranges for unknown input data. While the result of a simplified analysis is not expected to be definitive, the process of reasoning is illuminating for the parties involved, enabling innovators to articulate the benefits of their innovations and for all parties to highlight gaps in the data and evidence required to take the innovation forward.
部署电子表格工具,与医疗保健决策者一起对医疗设备创新进行早期经济价值评估
医疗器械创新的早期评估对医疗保健决策者和制造商都很重要。因此,在通常的卫生技术评估专家基础之外,越来越需要基本的成本效益分析。本文描述了一个电子表格工具,用于医疗保健服务专业人员和医疗保健技术创新者,他们不是卫生经济学专家。通过简化的决策树模型,该工具可用于比较新设备相关程序与现有设备或其他替代设备的标准护理的成本和患者收益。为了广泛地比较不同的治疗,该工具使用标准的质量调整生命年(QALY)来衡量临床结果。该工具帮助创新者/制造商专注于发展需求,以填补输入数据中的空白,从而从卫生经济学角度进一步加强其案例。结果表明,使用预期成本、文献结果数据和未知输入数据的估计范围,可以实现与设备相关的工具创新。虽然简化分析的结果不会是确定的,但推理的过程对相关各方来说是有启发意义的,使创新者能够阐明其创新的好处,并使所有各方都能突出推进创新所需的数据和证据中的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信