On the Status of "Things-in-Themselves" in Kant's Critical Philosophy

Chen Shi-fang
{"title":"On the Status of \"Things-in-Themselves\" in Kant's Critical Philosophy","authors":"Chen Shi-fang","doi":"10.1017/9780511624834.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kant's distinction between \"appearances\" and \"things-in-themselves\" asserts the existence of \"things-in-themselves\",but due to the limitation of our rationality,we cannot form any knowledge about it,then how can we know their existence,i.e.how to get \"other shore from this shore.\" Therefore,some critics holds that this concept by Kant is the concession to a dogmatically rooted extra-mental reality of a philosophy and is no in consistent to his spirit of critical philosophy.This understanding is wrong,as Kant's things-in-themselves concept is not independent part from the sphere of entity in thinking,but a thinking device,and an inevitable assumption when we human beings think about daily experience.Only by this can we run our concept mechanism,in which the tendency of objectivity plays a vital role.","PeriodicalId":255686,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Taiyuan Normal University","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Taiyuan Normal University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511624834.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kant's distinction between "appearances" and "things-in-themselves" asserts the existence of "things-in-themselves",but due to the limitation of our rationality,we cannot form any knowledge about it,then how can we know their existence,i.e.how to get "other shore from this shore." Therefore,some critics holds that this concept by Kant is the concession to a dogmatically rooted extra-mental reality of a philosophy and is no in consistent to his spirit of critical philosophy.This understanding is wrong,as Kant's things-in-themselves concept is not independent part from the sphere of entity in thinking,but a thinking device,and an inevitable assumption when we human beings think about daily experience.Only by this can we run our concept mechanism,in which the tendency of objectivity plays a vital role.
论“自在之物”在康德批判哲学中的地位
康德对“现象”与“自在之物”的区分肯定了“自在之物”的存在,但由于我们理性的限制,我们无法形成关于它的任何知识,那么我们如何知道它们的存在呢?如何从这个海岸到达另一个海岸因此,一些批评家认为,康德的这一概念是对一种哲学的教条式根源的精神外实在的让步,与他的批判哲学精神是不一致的。这种认识是错误的,因为康德的自在之物概念并不是思维的实体领域之外的独立部分,而是一种思维手段,是我们人类思考日常经验时不可避免的假设。只有这样,我们才能运行我们的概念机制,其中客观性倾向起着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信