The Positive Impact of Deliberate Writing Course Design on Student Learning Experience and Performance

Alia Lancaster, S. Moses, M. Clark, Megan C. Masters
{"title":"The Positive Impact of Deliberate Writing Course Design on Student Learning Experience and Performance","authors":"Alia Lancaster, S. Moses, M. Clark, Megan C. Masters","doi":"10.18608/jla.2020.73.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning management systems (LMSs) are ubiquitous components of the academic technology experience for learners across a wide variety of instructional contexts. Learners’ interactions within an LMS are often contingent upon how instructors architect a module, course, or program of study. Patterns related to these learner interactions, often referred to as learning analytics implementation (LAI), can be represented by combining system-level LMS data with course-level design decisions to inform more granular insights into learner behaviour. The purpose of this paper is to use the LAI framework, specifically the principles of coordination and comparison (Wise & Vytasek, 2017), to examine how learner interaction patterns associated with LMS-use variables correspond to deliberate learning design decisions and course outcomes for a group of courses in the same undergraduate writing program. Visualizations of learner activity exhibited similar patterns of learner engagement across courses, corroborating the observation that design decisions heavily influence learner behaviour. Predictive analyses demonstrated strong influence of LMS use on final grades while accounting for course instructor. That is, while page views were not related to final grade, the length of discussion entries was often predictive. These results suggest that students who practised writing more — the main learning objective of this course — had higher final grades, regardless of variations in instructor and semester.","PeriodicalId":145357,"journal":{"name":"J. Learn. Anal.","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Learn. Anal.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2020.73.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Learning management systems (LMSs) are ubiquitous components of the academic technology experience for learners across a wide variety of instructional contexts. Learners’ interactions within an LMS are often contingent upon how instructors architect a module, course, or program of study. Patterns related to these learner interactions, often referred to as learning analytics implementation (LAI), can be represented by combining system-level LMS data with course-level design decisions to inform more granular insights into learner behaviour. The purpose of this paper is to use the LAI framework, specifically the principles of coordination and comparison (Wise & Vytasek, 2017), to examine how learner interaction patterns associated with LMS-use variables correspond to deliberate learning design decisions and course outcomes for a group of courses in the same undergraduate writing program. Visualizations of learner activity exhibited similar patterns of learner engagement across courses, corroborating the observation that design decisions heavily influence learner behaviour. Predictive analyses demonstrated strong influence of LMS use on final grades while accounting for course instructor. That is, while page views were not related to final grade, the length of discussion entries was often predictive. These results suggest that students who practised writing more — the main learning objective of this course — had higher final grades, regardless of variations in instructor and semester.
刻意写作课程设计对学生学习体验和学习成绩的积极影响
学习管理系统(lms)是在各种教学环境中为学习者提供学术技术体验的普遍组成部分。学习者在LMS中的互动通常取决于教师如何构建模块、课程或学习计划。与这些学习者交互相关的模式(通常称为学习分析实现(LAI))可以通过将系统级LMS数据与课程级设计决策相结合来表示,从而提供对学习者行为的更细粒度的见解。本文的目的是使用LAI框架,特别是协调和比较原则(Wise & Vytasek, 2017)来研究与lms使用变量相关的学习者交互模式如何对应于同一本科写作项目中一组课程的刻意学习设计决策和课程结果。学习者活动的可视化展示了跨课程学习者参与的相似模式,证实了设计决策严重影响学习者行为的观察。预测分析表明,在考虑课程讲师的情况下,LMS的使用对最终成绩有很强的影响。也就是说,虽然页面浏览量与最终成绩无关,但讨论条目的长度通常是预测性的。这些结果表明,无论教师和学期的变化如何,多练习写作的学生(这门课的主要学习目标)的最终成绩都更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信