Analysis of manual manufacturing processes using motion sensing technologies

W. Han, Xiaoqian Liu, Jack H. Radcliffe, Maryam Ghariban, Jane Wei, Kevin C. Chung, P. Beling
{"title":"Analysis of manual manufacturing processes using motion sensing technologies","authors":"W. Han, Xiaoqian Liu, Jack H. Radcliffe, Maryam Ghariban, Jane Wei, Kevin C. Chung, P. Beling","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS.2014.6829876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate motion sensing technologies capable of collecting data that supports the analysis of workers in manufacturing environments, we developed a procedure to categorize manufacturing processes and many motion sensing technologies. Processes were decomposed into: resolution of movements, amount of noise, and detection difficulty; sensors were decomposed into: sensitivity, noise-cancellation capability, and detection capability. By analyzing each sensor alternative and checking if it provided the required functionality and level of performance, we were able to select sensor combinations for different categorized processes. The collected data were used to compare the performance differences between experienced and new workers through analytical and graphical analyses. Data analyses led us to a series of sample recommendations for novice operators to reduce their learning curves. These recommendations could also improve productivity and minimize production costs and risks related to safety. Given this methodology, manufacturers would be able to generalize the procedure to the majority of manufacturing processes and new sensing technologies in order to capture experts' tacit knowledge. We also used grit blasting as a sample manufacturing environment and five motion sensors to validate our methodology. The selected sensors were able to collect data within the working environment, and with that data we output visualizations and recommendations to the novice.","PeriodicalId":441073,"journal":{"name":"2014 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2014.6829876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

To evaluate motion sensing technologies capable of collecting data that supports the analysis of workers in manufacturing environments, we developed a procedure to categorize manufacturing processes and many motion sensing technologies. Processes were decomposed into: resolution of movements, amount of noise, and detection difficulty; sensors were decomposed into: sensitivity, noise-cancellation capability, and detection capability. By analyzing each sensor alternative and checking if it provided the required functionality and level of performance, we were able to select sensor combinations for different categorized processes. The collected data were used to compare the performance differences between experienced and new workers through analytical and graphical analyses. Data analyses led us to a series of sample recommendations for novice operators to reduce their learning curves. These recommendations could also improve productivity and minimize production costs and risks related to safety. Given this methodology, manufacturers would be able to generalize the procedure to the majority of manufacturing processes and new sensing technologies in order to capture experts' tacit knowledge. We also used grit blasting as a sample manufacturing environment and five motion sensors to validate our methodology. The selected sensors were able to collect data within the working environment, and with that data we output visualizations and recommendations to the novice.
用动作感应技术分析手工制造过程
为了评估能够收集支持制造环境中工人分析的数据的运动感应技术,我们开发了一个程序来对制造过程和许多运动感应技术进行分类。过程分解为:运动分辨率、噪声量、检测难度;传感器分为:灵敏度、消噪能力和检测能力。通过分析每个备选传感器并检查它是否提供所需的功能和性能水平,我们能够为不同分类的过程选择传感器组合。收集的数据通过分析和图形分析来比较经验丰富的员工和新员工之间的绩效差异。通过数据分析,我们为新手提供了一系列的样本建议,以减少他们的学习曲线。这些建议还可以提高生产率,最大限度地减少与安全有关的生产成本和风险。鉴于这种方法,制造商将能够将程序推广到大多数制造过程和新的传感技术,以获取专家的隐性知识。我们还使用喷砂作为样品制造环境和五个运动传感器来验证我们的方法。选定的传感器能够在工作环境中收集数据,并根据这些数据向新手输出可视化和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信