Automated evaluation of online mapping platforms

Phagasinee Boottho, S. Goldin
{"title":"Automated evaluation of online mapping platforms","authors":"Phagasinee Boottho, S. Goldin","doi":"10.1109/IEECON.2017.8075809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web mapping services have been offered by many companies. To choose an appropriate online mapping platform, it is important to be able to quantify and compare the quality of the different platforms, in different geographic areas. Most previous research comparing the quality of online maps has used a manual approach. Manual quality evaluation is labor-intensive and difficult to replicate in new geographic areas or using new online map providers. In our research, we have developed a framework and a set of automated tools for evaluating the quality of online mapping results. We use the online map provider APIs to perform repeatable queries then compare the results to reference data, which could be gathered by ground survey or based on external sources. In this paper, we explain our methodology and present example results for two test areas, a highly urbanized area and an area in a provincial town.","PeriodicalId":196081,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEECON.2017.8075809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Web mapping services have been offered by many companies. To choose an appropriate online mapping platform, it is important to be able to quantify and compare the quality of the different platforms, in different geographic areas. Most previous research comparing the quality of online maps has used a manual approach. Manual quality evaluation is labor-intensive and difficult to replicate in new geographic areas or using new online map providers. In our research, we have developed a framework and a set of automated tools for evaluating the quality of online mapping results. We use the online map provider APIs to perform repeatable queries then compare the results to reference data, which could be gathered by ground survey or based on external sources. In this paper, we explain our methodology and present example results for two test areas, a highly urbanized area and an area in a provincial town.
在线地图平台的自动评估
许多公司都提供了Web地图服务。要选择合适的在线地图平台,重要的是能够量化和比较不同地理区域不同平台的质量。之前大多数比较在线地图质量的研究都使用了手动方法。人工质量评估是劳动密集型的,很难在新的地理区域或使用新的在线地图提供商中复制。在我们的研究中,我们开发了一个框架和一套自动化工具来评估在线地图结果的质量。我们使用在线地图提供程序api来执行可重复的查询,然后将结果与参考数据进行比较,这些参考数据可以通过地面调查或基于外部来源收集。在本文中,我们解释了我们的方法,并给出了两个测试区域的例子结果,一个高度城市化地区和一个省级城镇地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信