Koblinger mellem økonomi og uddannelse

Christian Ydesen, K. Andreasen
{"title":"Koblinger mellem økonomi og uddannelse","authors":"Christian Ydesen, K. Andreasen","doi":"10.24834/EDUCARE.2019.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public administration of education systems after World War Two has been characterized by the increasing involvement of various forms of evaluation and performance measurement. By taking up such a central role, the various forms have had considerable impact on school pedagogy. At the same time, education systems have more and more come to be seen as levers for economic growth and prosperity, which in turn has strengthened and expanded these practices of evaluation and performance measurement. We argue that post-war educational accountability practices have taken on a new character where quantification, in light of economic concerns, gradually have taken pride of place. Paradoxically, the emerging welfare states have been committed to democratic ideals about inclusion and equal access to education. Such ideals are naturally followed by questions about social differentiation; and in that sense, they question whether an economistic approach to education in fact challenges the democratic values and processes expressed in the very purpose of education. Using Denmark as an example, the article explores these processes and questions by looking at the development and historical roots of the Danish public-school system.","PeriodicalId":395881,"journal":{"name":"Educare - vetenskapliga skrifter","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educare - vetenskapliga skrifter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24834/EDUCARE.2019.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Public administration of education systems after World War Two has been characterized by the increasing involvement of various forms of evaluation and performance measurement. By taking up such a central role, the various forms have had considerable impact on school pedagogy. At the same time, education systems have more and more come to be seen as levers for economic growth and prosperity, which in turn has strengthened and expanded these practices of evaluation and performance measurement. We argue that post-war educational accountability practices have taken on a new character where quantification, in light of economic concerns, gradually have taken pride of place. Paradoxically, the emerging welfare states have been committed to democratic ideals about inclusion and equal access to education. Such ideals are naturally followed by questions about social differentiation; and in that sense, they question whether an economistic approach to education in fact challenges the democratic values and processes expressed in the very purpose of education. Using Denmark as an example, the article explores these processes and questions by looking at the development and historical roots of the Danish public-school system.
金融与教育之间的联系
第二次世界大战后教育系统的公共行政的特点是越来越多地参与各种形式的评价和业绩衡量。由于发挥了这样的中心作用,各种形式对学校教学法产生了相当大的影响。与此同时,教育系统越来越被视为经济增长和繁荣的杠杆,这反过来又加强和扩大了这些评估和绩效衡量的做法。我们认为,战后教育问责制实践呈现出一种新的特征,根据经济考虑,量化逐渐占据了重要地位。矛盾的是,新兴福利国家一直致力于有关包容和平等教育机会的民主理想。这样的理想自然伴随着社会分化的问题;从这个意义上说,他们质疑经济的教育方法是否真的挑战了民主的价值观和教育目的所表达的过程。本文以丹麦为例,通过考察丹麦公立学校制度的发展和历史根源,探讨了这些过程和问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信