Beyond Conservatism and Radicalism? A Decolonial Glimpse into the Post-truth World

M. Tlostanova
{"title":"Beyond Conservatism and Radicalism? A Decolonial Glimpse into the Post-truth World","authors":"M. Tlostanova","doi":"10.1163/9789004445079_002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decolonial critique of modernity/coloniality emerged at the end of the Cold war when the happy image of globalization was launched as the only option left for the humanity. Decolonial thought instead came up with the idea of decoloniality as an alternative possible world with a specific epistemology, ethics and politics. This decolonial model has gradually become attractive worldwide against the failure of the positive phase of neoliberal globalization epitomized in the Covid-19 crisis. The binaries of conservatism and radicalism as well as right and left, democracy and authoritarianism, nationalism and cosmopolitanism are outdated products of the previous model of knowledge unable to describe the present social and political reality in which conservatism easily becomes radical and calling for change, whereas yesterday's radicals turn into supporters of status-quo who are nostalgic of the past. The present shift from neoliberal globalism to right-wing nationalism and populism essentially leaves the global coloniality intact and multiplies the number of the new dispensable defutured lives - human and other. It also adds additional angles of discrimination and dehumanization such as technological coloniality. Possible venues for decolonial re-existence are linked with relationality, refusal to compete for a better place in modernity or a tag of a victim, and working for \"deep coalitions”, thus attempting to give the world back its future dimension. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2021.","PeriodicalId":261569,"journal":{"name":"Africa’s Radicalisms and Conservatisms","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa’s Radicalisms and Conservatisms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004445079_002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decolonial critique of modernity/coloniality emerged at the end of the Cold war when the happy image of globalization was launched as the only option left for the humanity. Decolonial thought instead came up with the idea of decoloniality as an alternative possible world with a specific epistemology, ethics and politics. This decolonial model has gradually become attractive worldwide against the failure of the positive phase of neoliberal globalization epitomized in the Covid-19 crisis. The binaries of conservatism and radicalism as well as right and left, democracy and authoritarianism, nationalism and cosmopolitanism are outdated products of the previous model of knowledge unable to describe the present social and political reality in which conservatism easily becomes radical and calling for change, whereas yesterday's radicals turn into supporters of status-quo who are nostalgic of the past. The present shift from neoliberal globalism to right-wing nationalism and populism essentially leaves the global coloniality intact and multiplies the number of the new dispensable defutured lives - human and other. It also adds additional angles of discrimination and dehumanization such as technological coloniality. Possible venues for decolonial re-existence are linked with relationality, refusal to compete for a better place in modernity or a tag of a victim, and working for "deep coalitions”, thus attempting to give the world back its future dimension. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2021.
超越保守主义和激进主义?后真相世界的非殖民化一瞥
对现代性/殖民性的非殖民化批判出现在冷战结束时,全球化的美好形象作为人类的唯一选择被推出。相反,非殖民化思想提出了将非殖民化作为一个具有特定认识论、伦理和政治的另一种可能世界的想法。在新冠肺炎危机所体现的新自由主义全球化积极阶段的失败背景下,这种非殖民化模式在世界范围内逐渐变得具有吸引力。保守主义和激进主义、右翼和左翼、民主和威权主义、民族主义和世界主义的二元对立是以前的知识模式的过时产物,无法描述当前的社会和政治现实,保守主义很容易变得激进并呼吁变革,而昨天的激进分子则变成了怀念过去的现状支持者。当前从新自由主义全球主义到右翼民族主义和民粹主义的转变,本质上保持了全球殖民主义不变,并增加了新的可有可无的未来生命的数量——人类和其他。它还增加了歧视和非人化的其他角度,如技术殖民化。非殖民化再存在的可能场所与相关性有关,拒绝在现代性中争夺更好的位置或受害者的标签,并致力于“深度联盟”,从而试图让世界恢复其未来的维度。©Koninklijke Brill NV,莱顿,2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信