How should we ‘Explain in plain English’? Voices from the Community

Max Fowler, Binglin Chen, C. Zilles
{"title":"How should we ‘Explain in plain English’? Voices from the Community","authors":"Max Fowler, Binglin Chen, C. Zilles","doi":"10.1145/3446871.3469738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Explain in plain English” (EipE) questions are seen as an important developmental activity and assessment tool in the research community studying how people learn to program, but they aren’t widely used in practice because of difficulty of grading and workload issues. In this paper, we interviewed eleven members of the introductory programming education research community about their thoughts on EipE questions as a whole and how individual borderline student answers should be graded. Through inductive coding of the interview transcripts, we identify: (1) themes relating to how EipE questions should be used in class, (2) the importance of training students to complete EipE questions, (3) standards for the selection and presentation of code in EipE questions, (4) the theoretical and practical considerations relating to grading EipE questions, and (5) English as a second language (ESL) concerns. In addition, we attempt to extrapolate from our observations what the underlying grading process is that faculty are using to grade EipE questions.","PeriodicalId":309835,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

“Explain in plain English” (EipE) questions are seen as an important developmental activity and assessment tool in the research community studying how people learn to program, but they aren’t widely used in practice because of difficulty of grading and workload issues. In this paper, we interviewed eleven members of the introductory programming education research community about their thoughts on EipE questions as a whole and how individual borderline student answers should be graded. Through inductive coding of the interview transcripts, we identify: (1) themes relating to how EipE questions should be used in class, (2) the importance of training students to complete EipE questions, (3) standards for the selection and presentation of code in EipE questions, (4) the theoretical and practical considerations relating to grading EipE questions, and (5) English as a second language (ESL) concerns. In addition, we attempt to extrapolate from our observations what the underlying grading process is that faculty are using to grade EipE questions.
我们应该如何“用通俗易懂的英语解释”?社会的声音
“用简单的英语解释”(EipE)问题被视为研究人们如何学习编程的重要发展活动和评估工具,但由于评分困难和工作量问题,它们在实践中并未得到广泛应用。在本文中,我们采访了11位入门编程教育研究社区的成员,了解他们对整个EipE问题的看法,以及如何对个别边缘学生的答案进行评分。通过对访谈记录进行归纳编码,我们确定:(1)与课堂上如何使用EipE问题有关的主题,(2)训练学生完成EipE问题的重要性,(3)EipE问题中代码的选择和呈现标准,(4)与EipE问题评分相关的理论和实践考虑因素,以及(5)英语作为第二语言(ESL)问题。此外,我们试图从我们的观察中推断出教师们用来给EipE问题打分的潜在评分过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信