Governance Without Government: An Overview and Application of Interactions Between Law-State and Governance-Corporate Systems

L. Backer
{"title":"Governance Without Government: An Overview and Application of Interactions Between Law-State and Governance-Corporate Systems","authors":"L. Backer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1568934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diffusion of power in the wake of globalization has also revived the recognition of governance authority beyond the state and its formally constituted governance apparatus. Globalization is said to have produced movements toward governance that is based on functionally differentiated transnational public systems that operate above the state. Globalization has provided a governance framework environment marked by a fracturing and diffusing of power beyond political actors. Though the state remains very much alive and continues to be powerful within the ambit of its authority, its claim to a monopoly of governance power, either directly or through public organs at the supra- or infra- national levels, is no longer plausible. This chapter provides an overview of the extent of “governance without government” outside the framework of the state system of public law. It suggests the possibility of a public law without public organs, and the constitution of governance beyond both government and state. The chapter first examines the strands of the theoretical debate. The focus of this section is on a growing corpus of work that suggests that while non-governmental actors are, to an increasing extent, exercising governance power, defined in a variety of ways, none of these governance systems has achieved “escape velocity” from the state. Nor, for many, is such an escape necessary, feasible or prudent. The heart of the examination is on the more radical notion that private entities also govern without the state or its apparatus in functionally differentiated regulatory communities. This is not merely academic theory. A recent example from within the OECD’s enforcement structure points the way to the future. Through an examination of the U.K. National Contact Point’s decision in Vedanta one sees the outlines of polycentricity as an aggregating mechanism for the elaboration of non-state systems free, within its jurisdiction, from the state.","PeriodicalId":375754,"journal":{"name":"Public International Law eJournal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public International Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1568934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The diffusion of power in the wake of globalization has also revived the recognition of governance authority beyond the state and its formally constituted governance apparatus. Globalization is said to have produced movements toward governance that is based on functionally differentiated transnational public systems that operate above the state. Globalization has provided a governance framework environment marked by a fracturing and diffusing of power beyond political actors. Though the state remains very much alive and continues to be powerful within the ambit of its authority, its claim to a monopoly of governance power, either directly or through public organs at the supra- or infra- national levels, is no longer plausible. This chapter provides an overview of the extent of “governance without government” outside the framework of the state system of public law. It suggests the possibility of a public law without public organs, and the constitution of governance beyond both government and state. The chapter first examines the strands of the theoretical debate. The focus of this section is on a growing corpus of work that suggests that while non-governmental actors are, to an increasing extent, exercising governance power, defined in a variety of ways, none of these governance systems has achieved “escape velocity” from the state. Nor, for many, is such an escape necessary, feasible or prudent. The heart of the examination is on the more radical notion that private entities also govern without the state or its apparatus in functionally differentiated regulatory communities. This is not merely academic theory. A recent example from within the OECD’s enforcement structure points the way to the future. Through an examination of the U.K. National Contact Point’s decision in Vedanta one sees the outlines of polycentricity as an aggregating mechanism for the elaboration of non-state systems free, within its jurisdiction, from the state.
没有政府的治理:法律-国家与治理-公司制度相互作用的综述与应用
全球化带来的权力分散也使人们重新认识到超越国家及其正式构成的治理机构的治理权威。据说,全球化产生了一种治理运动,这种运动是基于在国家之上运作的、功能上有区别的跨国公共体系。全球化提供了一个治理框架环境,其特征是政治行为者之外的权力分裂和分散。尽管国家仍然生机勃勃,并在其权力范围内继续保持强大,但其直接或通过国家以上或国家以下各级公共机构垄断治理权力的主张已不再可信。本章概述了公法国家体系框架之外“无政府治理”的范围。它提出了一种没有公共机构的公法的可能性,以及超越政府和国家的治理宪法。本章首先考察了理论争论的脉络。本节的重点是越来越多的工作,这些工作表明,尽管非政府行为体在越来越多的程度上以各种方式行使治理权力,但这些治理系统都没有达到从国家“逃逸速度”。对许多人来说,这种逃避既不必要,也不可行,也不谨慎。研究的核心是一个更为激进的概念,即在功能差异化的监管社区中,私人实体也可以在没有国家或其机构的情况下进行治理。这不仅仅是学术理论。经合组织(OECD)执行结构最近的一个例子为未来指明了方向。通过对英国国家联络点在韦丹塔案中的决定的考察,人们可以看到多中心的轮廓,它是一种非国家系统的聚合机制,在其管辖范围内,不受国家控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信