{"title":"Classification and clustering to identify spoken dialects in Indonesian","authors":"Jacqueline Ibrahim, D. Lestari","doi":"10.1109/ICODSE.2017.8285852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explains classification using Support Vector Machines (SVM) technique and clustering using K-means technique in identifying eight spoken dialects in Indonesian language. Dialect identification is important to build a better Automatic Speech Recognition system. The experiment in this research is divided into using three features of sound; Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC), spectral flux, and spectral centroid, and compares it to model with MFCC features only. For methods, it uses one-against-one and all-at-once as comparison. The best result is from using SVM one-against-one with three features which gives 55%.","PeriodicalId":366005,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICODSE.2017.8285852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This paper explains classification using Support Vector Machines (SVM) technique and clustering using K-means technique in identifying eight spoken dialects in Indonesian language. Dialect identification is important to build a better Automatic Speech Recognition system. The experiment in this research is divided into using three features of sound; Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC), spectral flux, and spectral centroid, and compares it to model with MFCC features only. For methods, it uses one-against-one and all-at-once as comparison. The best result is from using SVM one-against-one with three features which gives 55%.