Online channel design in the presence of price self-matching: Self-operating or e-marketplace?

Jie Wei, Mei Ying Chang
{"title":"Online channel design in the presence of price self-matching: Self-operating or e-marketplace?","authors":"Jie Wei, Mei Ying Chang","doi":"10.3934/jimo.2022043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many traditional retailers become multi-channel retailers by establishing self-operated online channel or employing e-retailer's e-marketplace, and some multi-channel retailers adopt price self-matching to mitigate intense price competition in multi-channel retailing. Our goal in this research is to examine how the multi-channel retailer's online channel design interacts with its price self-matching strategy in a supply chain including a multi-channel retailer and an e-retailer. Our study demonstrates that adopting price self-matching does not necessarily benefit the multi-channel retailer. Moreover, price self-matching can greatly impact the performance of the multi-channel retailer's online channel design, for example, under some market conditions where the multi-channel retailer can benefit from price self-matching only if it employs the e-retailer's e-marketplace, the multi-channel retailer should design online channel according to the e-marketplace's commission rate; but under other market conditions, it should always establish self-operated online channel. Overall, only the strategy of establishing self-operated online channel and adopting price self-matching and the strategy of employing the e-retailer's e-marketplace and adopting price self-matching can help the two retailers achieve a win-win situation. Furthermore, we show that, interestingly, a more prominent disadvantage of the self-operated online channel's potential demand benefits not only the e-retailer but also the multi-channel retailer.","PeriodicalId":347719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2022043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many traditional retailers become multi-channel retailers by establishing self-operated online channel or employing e-retailer's e-marketplace, and some multi-channel retailers adopt price self-matching to mitigate intense price competition in multi-channel retailing. Our goal in this research is to examine how the multi-channel retailer's online channel design interacts with its price self-matching strategy in a supply chain including a multi-channel retailer and an e-retailer. Our study demonstrates that adopting price self-matching does not necessarily benefit the multi-channel retailer. Moreover, price self-matching can greatly impact the performance of the multi-channel retailer's online channel design, for example, under some market conditions where the multi-channel retailer can benefit from price self-matching only if it employs the e-retailer's e-marketplace, the multi-channel retailer should design online channel according to the e-marketplace's commission rate; but under other market conditions, it should always establish self-operated online channel. Overall, only the strategy of establishing self-operated online channel and adopting price self-matching and the strategy of employing the e-retailer's e-marketplace and adopting price self-matching can help the two retailers achieve a win-win situation. Furthermore, we show that, interestingly, a more prominent disadvantage of the self-operated online channel's potential demand benefits not only the e-retailer but also the multi-channel retailer.
价格自匹配下的线上渠道设计:自营还是电商?
许多传统零售商通过建立自营的在线渠道或利用电子零售商的电子市场成为多渠道零售商,一些多渠道零售商采用价格自匹配来缓解多渠道零售中激烈的价格竞争。本研究的目的是研究多渠道零售商的在线渠道设计如何与包括多渠道零售商和电子零售商在内的供应链中的价格自匹配策略相互作用。我们的研究表明,采用价格自匹配并不一定有利于多渠道零售商。此外,价格自匹配对多渠道零售商在线渠道设计的绩效影响很大,例如,在某些市场条件下,多渠道零售商只有采用电子零售商的电子市场才能从价格自匹配中获益,多渠道零售商应根据电子市场的佣金率来设计在线渠道;但在其他市场条件下,应始终建立自营在线渠道。总的来说,只有建立自营网络渠道并采取价格自匹配的策略和利用电子零售商的电子市场并采取价格自匹配的策略才能帮助两家零售商实现双赢。此外,有趣的是,我们表明,自营在线渠道的潜在需求的一个更突出的缺点不仅有利于电子零售商,也有利于多渠道零售商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信