Systematic Preprocessing of Dielectric Spectroscopy Data and Estimating Viable Cell Densities

Selina Ramm, T. H. Rodríguez, Björn Frahm, M. Pein-Hackelbusch
{"title":"Systematic Preprocessing of Dielectric Spectroscopy Data and Estimating Viable Cell Densities","authors":"Selina Ramm, T. H. Rodríguez, Björn Frahm, M. Pein-Hackelbusch","doi":"10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10218012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For process monitoring, an adequate data preprocessing is crucial to link accessible inline process data with offline measured target variables. Literature, however, does not provide systematic preprocessing strategies. The effects of five different preprocessing strategies on data from a Dielectric Spectroscopy system applied to the Viable Cell Density (VCD) of a mammalian cell cultivation were thus evaluated. Single-frequency measurements are typically used to model the VCD over the growth phase using linear regression or the Cole-Cole model and served as a reference. As multi-frequency measurement is promising to model the VCD beyond the growth phase using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), we further aimed to determine, whether replacing linear regression by PLSR shows comparable modeling performance. All five preprocessing strategies led to comparable results. Exemplary, when using capacitance values at a frequency of 3347 kHz, linear regression resulted in a $\\mathrm{R}^{2}$ of 0.90 and a standard deviation of 0.4 % on average. Both normalization techniques had the same positive effect on the results of PLSR. The order of smoothing and normalization was irrelevant for both regression methods. Comparing the results of linear regression and PLSR, the latter obtained on average 9 % better results. Therefore, we concluded that PLSR is preferable over linear regression and is potentially suitable to model the VCD beyond the growth phase, which is suggested to be investigated based on more data sets.","PeriodicalId":174443,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10218012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For process monitoring, an adequate data preprocessing is crucial to link accessible inline process data with offline measured target variables. Literature, however, does not provide systematic preprocessing strategies. The effects of five different preprocessing strategies on data from a Dielectric Spectroscopy system applied to the Viable Cell Density (VCD) of a mammalian cell cultivation were thus evaluated. Single-frequency measurements are typically used to model the VCD over the growth phase using linear regression or the Cole-Cole model and served as a reference. As multi-frequency measurement is promising to model the VCD beyond the growth phase using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), we further aimed to determine, whether replacing linear regression by PLSR shows comparable modeling performance. All five preprocessing strategies led to comparable results. Exemplary, when using capacitance values at a frequency of 3347 kHz, linear regression resulted in a $\mathrm{R}^{2}$ of 0.90 and a standard deviation of 0.4 % on average. Both normalization techniques had the same positive effect on the results of PLSR. The order of smoothing and normalization was irrelevant for both regression methods. Comparing the results of linear regression and PLSR, the latter obtained on average 9 % better results. Therefore, we concluded that PLSR is preferable over linear regression and is potentially suitable to model the VCD beyond the growth phase, which is suggested to be investigated based on more data sets.
介质光谱数据的系统预处理与活细胞密度估算
对于过程监控,充分的数据预处理对于将可访问的内联过程数据与离线测量目标变量联系起来至关重要。然而,文献并没有提供系统的预处理策略。本文评价了五种不同的预处理策略对电介质光谱系统中用于哺乳动物细胞培养的活细胞密度(VCD)数据的影响。单频测量通常用于使用线性回归或Cole-Cole模型对生长阶段的VCD进行建模,并作为参考。由于多频测量有望使用偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)对VCD生长阶段之后的模型进行建模,我们进一步旨在确定,用PLSR取代线性回归是否具有可比较的建模性能。所有五种预处理策略都产生了可比较的结果。例如,当使用频率为3347 kHz的电容值时,线性回归导致$\math {R}^{2}$为0.90,平均标准差为0.4%。两种归一化技术对PLSR结果有相同的积极影响。两种回归方法的平滑和归一化顺序无关。将线性回归与PLSR的结果进行比较,后者的结果平均好9%。因此,我们得出的结论是,PLSR比线性回归更好,并且可能适用于VCD生长阶段之后的模型,建议基于更多的数据集进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信