{"title":"The usage of ILLiad and Get It Now at a US medium-sized academic library over a three-year period","authors":"Megan A. Jaskowiak, Todd Spires","doi":"10.1108/ILDS-02-2016-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nAs medium-sized academic libraries’ budgets continue to shrink or cannot compete with inflation rates, document delivery options like ILLiad and unmediated Get It Now can play a prominent role in providing content lost due to the inevitable cancellation of serial subscriptions. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of using these two options in a US university. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThis paper examines the usage of these two services for the three fiscal years following the implementation of Get It Now at Bradley University. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nQuestions addressed are as follows. How have they been used over the three-year time period? Which user status group has been using them, undergraduates, graduate students or faculty members? Which departments on campus have been using them the most? \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis study is the first to look at the usage of Get It Now and ILLiad together over multiple years.","PeriodicalId":130902,"journal":{"name":"Interlending & Document Supply","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interlending & Document Supply","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ILDS-02-2016-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Purpose
As medium-sized academic libraries’ budgets continue to shrink or cannot compete with inflation rates, document delivery options like ILLiad and unmediated Get It Now can play a prominent role in providing content lost due to the inevitable cancellation of serial subscriptions. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of using these two options in a US university.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper examines the usage of these two services for the three fiscal years following the implementation of Get It Now at Bradley University.
Findings
Questions addressed are as follows. How have they been used over the three-year time period? Which user status group has been using them, undergraduates, graduate students or faculty members? Which departments on campus have been using them the most?
Originality/value
This study is the first to look at the usage of Get It Now and ILLiad together over multiple years.
由于中等规模的学术图书馆的预算持续缩水或无法与通货膨胀率竞争,像ILLiad和无中介的Get It Now这样的文件交付选择可以在提供由于不可避免的连续订阅取消而丢失的内容方面发挥重要作用。本文旨在评估在美国大学中使用这两种选择的影响。设计/方法/方法本文考察了在布拉德利大学实施Get It Now后的三个财政年度这两项服务的使用情况。调查结果涉及的问题如下。在这三年的时间里,它们是如何被使用的?哪个用户状态组一直在使用它们,本科生、研究生还是教员?校园里哪个系使用得最多?这项研究首次将Get It Now和ILLiad多年来的使用情况结合在一起。