Constant Leverage Modeling: A Reply to 'a Tutorial on the Mckinsey Model for Valuation of Companies'

Ignacio Vélez-Pareja, Joseph Tham
{"title":"Constant Leverage Modeling: A Reply to 'a Tutorial on the Mckinsey Model for Valuation of Companies'","authors":"Ignacio Vélez-Pareja, Joseph Tham","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.906786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this note we analyze the tutorial based on the McKinsey methodology for valuing companies. We have found that the McKinsey methodology has one of the most common mistakes mentioned in Tham and Velez-Pareja (2004a and b): valuing cash flows with a constant cost of capital when the leverage is not constant. We calculate the proper firm andequity values by assuming the free cash flow, FCF calculated in the tutorial, and deriving the cash flow to equity, CFE. We develop the proper calculations of firm and equity values for constant leverage as well. For both calculations we calculate the deviations from the values calculated in the tutorial.","PeriodicalId":124895,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Entrepreneurship Research & Policy Education (ERPN) (Topic)","volume":"52 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Entrepreneurship Research & Policy Education (ERPN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.906786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this note we analyze the tutorial based on the McKinsey methodology for valuing companies. We have found that the McKinsey methodology has one of the most common mistakes mentioned in Tham and Velez-Pareja (2004a and b): valuing cash flows with a constant cost of capital when the leverage is not constant. We calculate the proper firm andequity values by assuming the free cash flow, FCF calculated in the tutorial, and deriving the cash flow to equity, CFE. We develop the proper calculations of firm and equity values for constant leverage as well. For both calculations we calculate the deviations from the values calculated in the tutorial.
恒杠杆模型:对“麦肯锡公司估值模型教程”的回复
在这篇文章中,我们将根据麦肯锡评估公司的方法来分析这篇教程。我们发现,麦肯锡的方法存在Tham和Velez-Pareja (2004a和b)中提到的最常见错误之一:在杠杆不恒定的情况下,用恒定的资本成本来评估现金流。我们通过假设在教程中计算的自由现金流(FCF)和推导到权益的现金流(CFE)来计算适当的公司和股权价值。我们还开发了恒定杠杆下公司和股权价值的适当计算。对于这两种计算,我们都计算与教程中计算值的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信