Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Bank and Thrift Holding Company Risk: Evidence from the Stock Market

Scott Deacle, Elyas Elyasiani
{"title":"Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Bank and Thrift Holding Company Risk: Evidence from the Stock Market","authors":"Scott Deacle, Elyas Elyasiani","doi":"10.1111/1540-6229.12174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using bivariate GARCH models of stock portfolio returns and risk, we find that bank and thrift holding companies that relied the most on Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances exhibited less total risk and market risk than those that relied on them the least between 2001 and 2012. When we control for differences in holding company size, stock trading volume, residential mortgage lending, and holding company type (bank versus thrift), the most FHLB-reliant holding companies sustain the aforesaid risk advantages except during the crisis of 2007–2009, when they exhibit greater idiosyncratic risk. The latter finding suggests that investors perceived the high reliance of the borrowing institutions on advances as a sign of distress. Portfolios that consist of only bank holding companies show qualitatively similar results. \n \nThis article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":259209,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Real Estate Economics","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Real Estate Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using bivariate GARCH models of stock portfolio returns and risk, we find that bank and thrift holding companies that relied the most on Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances exhibited less total risk and market risk than those that relied on them the least between 2001 and 2012. When we control for differences in holding company size, stock trading volume, residential mortgage lending, and holding company type (bank versus thrift), the most FHLB-reliant holding companies sustain the aforesaid risk advantages except during the crisis of 2007–2009, when they exhibit greater idiosyncratic risk. The latter finding suggests that investors perceived the high reliance of the borrowing institutions on advances as a sign of distress. Portfolios that consist of only bank holding companies show qualitatively similar results. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
联邦住房贷款银行预付款和银行及储蓄银行控股公司风险:来自股票市场的证据
利用二元GARCH模型分析股票投资组合收益和风险,我们发现在2001年至2012年期间,最依赖联邦住房贷款银行(FHLB)贷款的银行和储蓄控股公司表现出的总风险和市场风险低于最不依赖联邦住房贷款银行的银行和储蓄控股公司。当我们控制控股公司规模、股票交易量、住宅抵押贷款和控股公司类型(银行与储蓄银行)的差异时,最依赖fhlb的控股公司保持上述风险优势,除了2007-2009年危机期间,当它们表现出更大的特质风险时。后一项发现表明,投资者将借贷机构对预付款的高度依赖视为一种困境迹象。仅由银行控股公司组成的投资组合在质量上也表现出类似的结果。这篇文章受版权保护。版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信