Chapter 26: Water security and environmental justice in Nigeria and South Africa: achievable concord or discordant alliance?

Irekpitan Okukpon
{"title":"Chapter 26: Water security and environmental justice in Nigeria and South Africa: achievable concord or discordant alliance?","authors":"Irekpitan Okukpon","doi":"10.5771/9783845294605-561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the world seeks responses to converging risks from inequality and environmental change, attention is placed on the role of improved governance for sustainable development. The way in which ecosystems and natural resources are currently governed often results in deprivation, marginalisation and structural inequality.1 In many contexts, “environmental degradation generates further poverty by the exhaustion of natural resources and creates prejudice to the exercise of basic rights”.2 Poor and vulnerable communities suffer from various forms of environmental injustice, often unable to fight back and reverse trends, which keep them mired in a state of exclusion.3 Without a paradigm shift in how natural resources and the environment are valued and governed, inequality will deepen and post-2015 developmental goals will be threatened, if not reversed.4 The concept of environmental justice has arisen, in this context, as a mechanism of accountability and legal transformations aimed at curbing abuses of power that result in the poor and vulnerable suffering disproportionate impacts of pollution and lacking equal opportunity to access and benefit from natural resources.5 Environmental justice emerged as a self-conscious movement in the 1980s,6 originally focused on the inequity of the distribution of toxics and hazardous waste in the United States of America, but has now moved far beyond this.7 A major focus of the environmental justice scholarship has always been a move beyond the simple description and documentation of inequity into a thorough analysis of the underlying reasons for that injustice.8 It also involved participatory justice, namely speaking for ourselves or a seat at the table; a","PeriodicalId":149275,"journal":{"name":"Law | Environment | Africa","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law | Environment | Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845294605-561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the world seeks responses to converging risks from inequality and environmental change, attention is placed on the role of improved governance for sustainable development. The way in which ecosystems and natural resources are currently governed often results in deprivation, marginalisation and structural inequality.1 In many contexts, “environmental degradation generates further poverty by the exhaustion of natural resources and creates prejudice to the exercise of basic rights”.2 Poor and vulnerable communities suffer from various forms of environmental injustice, often unable to fight back and reverse trends, which keep them mired in a state of exclusion.3 Without a paradigm shift in how natural resources and the environment are valued and governed, inequality will deepen and post-2015 developmental goals will be threatened, if not reversed.4 The concept of environmental justice has arisen, in this context, as a mechanism of accountability and legal transformations aimed at curbing abuses of power that result in the poor and vulnerable suffering disproportionate impacts of pollution and lacking equal opportunity to access and benefit from natural resources.5 Environmental justice emerged as a self-conscious movement in the 1980s,6 originally focused on the inequity of the distribution of toxics and hazardous waste in the United States of America, but has now moved far beyond this.7 A major focus of the environmental justice scholarship has always been a move beyond the simple description and documentation of inequity into a thorough analysis of the underlying reasons for that injustice.8 It also involved participatory justice, namely speaking for ourselves or a seat at the table; a
第26章:尼日利亚和南非的水安全和环境正义:可实现的和谐还是不和谐的联盟?
随着世界寻求应对不平等和环境变化带来的风险,人们开始关注改善治理对可持续发展的作用。目前管理生态系统和自然资源的方式往往导致剥夺、边缘化和结构性不平等在许多情况下,“环境退化由于自然资源枯竭而造成进一步的贫穷,并妨碍基本权利的行使”贫穷和脆弱的社区遭受各种形式的环境不公正,往往无法反击和扭转趋势,使他们陷入被排斥的状态如果不转变自然资源和环境的价值和治理模式,不平等将加深,2015年后的发展目标将受到威胁,如果不是逆转的话在这方面出现了环境正义的概念,作为一种责任机制和法律改革,目的是制止滥用权力,因为滥用权力导致穷人和易受伤害的人受到污染的不成比例的影响,并且缺乏获得和受益自然资源的平等机会环境正义运动是在20世纪80年代作为一种自觉的运动出现的,最初关注的是美国有毒物质和危险废物分配的不公平,但现在已经远远超出了这个范围环境正义研究的一个主要焦点一直是超越对不平等的简单描述和记录,而深入分析造成这种不公正的根本原因它还涉及参与性司法,即为我们自己说话或在谈判桌上占有一席之地;一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书