Monitoring AI Services for Misuse

S. A. Javadi, Chris Norval, Richard Cloete, Jatinder Singh
{"title":"Monitoring AI Services for Misuse","authors":"S. A. Javadi, Chris Norval, Richard Cloete, Jatinder Singh","doi":"10.1145/3461702.3462566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the surge in interest in AI, we now see the emergence of Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS). AIaaS entails service providers offering remote access to ML models and capabilities at arms-length', through networked APIs. Such services will grow in popularity, as they enable access to state-of-the-art ML capabilities, 'on demand', 'out of the box', at low cost and without requiring training data or ML expertise. However, there is much public concern regarding AI. AIaaS raises particular considerations, given there is much potential for such services to be used to underpin and drive problematic, inappropriate, undesirable, controversial, or possibly even illegal applications. A key way forward is through service providers monitoring their AI services to identify potential situations of problematic use. Towards this, we elaborate the potential for 'misuse indicators' as a mechanism for uncovering patterns of usage behaviour warranting consideration or further investigation. We introduce a taxonomy for describing these indicators and their contextual considerations, and use exemplars to demonstrate the feasibility analysing AIaaS usage to highlight situations of possible concern. We also seek to draw more attention to AI services and the issues they raise, given AIaaS' increasing prominence, and the general calls for the more responsible and accountable use of AI.","PeriodicalId":197336,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Given the surge in interest in AI, we now see the emergence of Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS). AIaaS entails service providers offering remote access to ML models and capabilities at arms-length', through networked APIs. Such services will grow in popularity, as they enable access to state-of-the-art ML capabilities, 'on demand', 'out of the box', at low cost and without requiring training data or ML expertise. However, there is much public concern regarding AI. AIaaS raises particular considerations, given there is much potential for such services to be used to underpin and drive problematic, inappropriate, undesirable, controversial, or possibly even illegal applications. A key way forward is through service providers monitoring their AI services to identify potential situations of problematic use. Towards this, we elaborate the potential for 'misuse indicators' as a mechanism for uncovering patterns of usage behaviour warranting consideration or further investigation. We introduce a taxonomy for describing these indicators and their contextual considerations, and use exemplars to demonstrate the feasibility analysing AIaaS usage to highlight situations of possible concern. We also seek to draw more attention to AI services and the issues they raise, given AIaaS' increasing prominence, and the general calls for the more responsible and accountable use of AI.
监控人工智能服务的滥用
鉴于人们对人工智能的兴趣激增,我们现在看到了人工智能即服务(AIaaS)的出现。AIaaS要求服务提供商通过网络api提供对机器学习模型和功能的远程访问。这些服务将越来越受欢迎,因为它们可以以低成本访问最先进的机器学习功能,“按需”,“开箱即用”,不需要训练数据或机器学习专业知识。然而,公众对人工智能有很多担忧。AIaaS提出了一些特别的考虑,因为这些服务很有可能被用来支持和驱动有问题的、不适当的、不受欢迎的、有争议的,甚至可能是非法的应用程序。一个关键的方法是通过服务提供商监控他们的人工智能服务,以识别潜在的问题使用情况。为此,我们详细阐述了“滥用指标”的潜力,作为一种机制,可以发现需要考虑或进一步调查的使用行为模式。我们引入了一种分类法来描述这些指标及其上下文考虑因素,并使用示例来演示分析AIaaS使用的可行性,以突出可能关注的情况。鉴于AIaaS日益突出,我们还寻求更多地关注人工智能服务及其引发的问题,并呼吁更负责任和负责任地使用人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信