Promoting positive interactions between midwives and obstetricians at the primary/secondary interface

R. Cassie, Christine Griffiths, George Parker
{"title":"Promoting positive interactions between midwives and obstetricians at the primary/secondary interface","authors":"R. Cassie, Christine Griffiths, George Parker","doi":"10.12784/nzcomjnl57.2021.6.41-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Interprofessional communication is a critical component of safe maternity care. The literature reports circumstances in Aotearoa New Zealand and overseas when interprofessional collaboration works well between midwives and obstetricians, as well as descriptions of unsatisfactory communication between the two professions. Aim: To explore and define effective collaboration between midwives and obstetricians at the primary/secondary interface in maternity care, in order to generate suggestions to foster positive collaboration. Method: Eight primary care midwives, three obstetricians and two obstetric registrars from a single District Health Board in Aotearoa New Zealand were interviewed about their interactions at the primary/secondary interface and their understanding, and use, of the Referral Guidelines. The theoretical perspective was Appreciative Inquiry. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: Results indicate usually positive interprofessional interactions. Dominant emergent themes are the need to negotiate differing philosophies, to clarify blurred boundaries that sometimes lead to lack of clear lines of responsibility, and the importance of three-way conversations. Of the three themes, this article focuses on three-way communication between midwife, obstetrician/registrar and woman. Participants reported that, when effective three-way communication between woman, midwife and obstetrician occurred, philosophical difference could be negotiated, blurred boundaries clarified and understanding of the respective roles of the LMC midwife and the obstetric team promoted. Participants value the Referral Guidelines but report some limitations to their applicability. Conclusion: Effective three-way communication promotes good maternity care. This study has identified ways to support optimal communication.","PeriodicalId":137118,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand College of Midwives Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12784/nzcomjnl57.2021.6.41-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional communication is a critical component of safe maternity care. The literature reports circumstances in Aotearoa New Zealand and overseas when interprofessional collaboration works well between midwives and obstetricians, as well as descriptions of unsatisfactory communication between the two professions. Aim: To explore and define effective collaboration between midwives and obstetricians at the primary/secondary interface in maternity care, in order to generate suggestions to foster positive collaboration. Method: Eight primary care midwives, three obstetricians and two obstetric registrars from a single District Health Board in Aotearoa New Zealand were interviewed about their interactions at the primary/secondary interface and their understanding, and use, of the Referral Guidelines. The theoretical perspective was Appreciative Inquiry. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: Results indicate usually positive interprofessional interactions. Dominant emergent themes are the need to negotiate differing philosophies, to clarify blurred boundaries that sometimes lead to lack of clear lines of responsibility, and the importance of three-way conversations. Of the three themes, this article focuses on three-way communication between midwife, obstetrician/registrar and woman. Participants reported that, when effective three-way communication between woman, midwife and obstetrician occurred, philosophical difference could be negotiated, blurred boundaries clarified and understanding of the respective roles of the LMC midwife and the obstetric team promoted. Participants value the Referral Guidelines but report some limitations to their applicability. Conclusion: Effective three-way communication promotes good maternity care. This study has identified ways to support optimal communication.
促进助产士和产科医生在初级/二级界面之间的积极互动
背景:专业间沟通是安全孕产护理的重要组成部分。文献报道了在新西兰和海外的情况下,助产士和产科医生之间的跨专业合作工作良好,以及描述了两个专业之间不满意的沟通。目的:探讨和界定助产士和产科医生在初级/二级产科护理界面之间的有效合作,以产生建议,以促进积极的合作。方法:对来自新西兰奥特罗阿单一地区卫生委员会的8名初级保健助产士、3名产科医生和2名产科登记员进行访谈,了解他们在初级/二级界面的互动以及他们对转诊指南的理解和使用情况。理论视角为欣赏式探究。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。研究发现:结果表明通常是积极的专业间互动。主要的紧急主题是需要协商不同的理念,澄清模糊的界限,有时导致缺乏明确的责任界限,以及三方对话的重要性。在这三个主题中,本文主要关注助产士、产科医生/注册医生和妇女之间的三方沟通。与会者报告说,当妇女、助产士和产科医生之间进行有效的三方沟通时,可以协商哲学上的差异,澄清模糊的界限,并促进对LMC助产士和产科团队各自角色的理解。参与者重视推荐指南,但报告了其适用性的一些限制。结论:有效的三方沟通有助于做好产妇护理工作。这项研究已经确定了支持最佳沟通的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信