{"title":"Clarifying Costs: Can Increased Price Transparency Reduce Healthcare Spending?","authors":"M. Muir, Stephanie A. Alessi, Jaime S. King","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2224151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As healthcare expenditures continue to climb, politicians, business leaders, and patients avidly search for new methods to reduce healthcare costs. In an eleven-point plan released this summer, a group of the nation’s top healthcare experts listed “full transparency of prices” as one potential solution to reduce healthcare costs. The experts, some of whom helped write the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, argued that price transparency would allow consumers to compare prices before choosing a provider or hospital and, consequently, better anticipate their overall costs. In turn, they argued that making price information publicly accessible would also reduce excess healthcare spending by encouraging providers to offer more competitive pricing. Other health services research, however, suggests that legislative and regulatory efforts to promote price transparency may result in increased healthcare costs depending on the market conditions and the various stakeholders targeted. Consequently, any price transparency initiative must not only make prices transparent, but also account for the differences between markets, either by reducing the economic inefficiencies that keep price transparency from being effective or by targeting only the specific regions where the market would support such an initiative. This article analyzes whether price transparency initiatives can be effectively used to reduce healthcare costs, and if so, what conditions must be met for them to do so. The features of a well-designed price transparency initiative will vary depending upon the targeted population (patients, employers, providers, or insurers) and the particular features of the target market. We argue that the most effective solutions will mandate disclosure of price and quality information at the appropriate stakeholder levels and, simultaneously, break down provider market leverage where it prevents price transparency from helping consumers. Together, these two elements have the potential to lower healthcare costs. Finally, we present four possible price transparency initiatives that represent a range of possible avenues to promoting effective price transparency including litigation, legislation, regulation, and consumer driven initiatives.","PeriodicalId":117505,"journal":{"name":"UC Hastings College of the Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UC Hastings College of the Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2224151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Abstract
As healthcare expenditures continue to climb, politicians, business leaders, and patients avidly search for new methods to reduce healthcare costs. In an eleven-point plan released this summer, a group of the nation’s top healthcare experts listed “full transparency of prices” as one potential solution to reduce healthcare costs. The experts, some of whom helped write the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, argued that price transparency would allow consumers to compare prices before choosing a provider or hospital and, consequently, better anticipate their overall costs. In turn, they argued that making price information publicly accessible would also reduce excess healthcare spending by encouraging providers to offer more competitive pricing. Other health services research, however, suggests that legislative and regulatory efforts to promote price transparency may result in increased healthcare costs depending on the market conditions and the various stakeholders targeted. Consequently, any price transparency initiative must not only make prices transparent, but also account for the differences between markets, either by reducing the economic inefficiencies that keep price transparency from being effective or by targeting only the specific regions where the market would support such an initiative. This article analyzes whether price transparency initiatives can be effectively used to reduce healthcare costs, and if so, what conditions must be met for them to do so. The features of a well-designed price transparency initiative will vary depending upon the targeted population (patients, employers, providers, or insurers) and the particular features of the target market. We argue that the most effective solutions will mandate disclosure of price and quality information at the appropriate stakeholder levels and, simultaneously, break down provider market leverage where it prevents price transparency from helping consumers. Together, these two elements have the potential to lower healthcare costs. Finally, we present four possible price transparency initiatives that represent a range of possible avenues to promoting effective price transparency including litigation, legislation, regulation, and consumer driven initiatives.
随着医疗保健支出的持续攀升,政界人士、商界领袖和患者都在热切地寻找降低医疗保健成本的新方法。在今年夏天发布的11点计划中,一群国家顶级医疗保健专家将“价格完全透明”列为降低医疗保健成本的一个潜在解决方案。这些专家中的一些人曾帮助撰写《患者保护和平价医疗法案》(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)。他们认为,价格透明将允许消费者在选择供应商或医院之前比较价格,从而更好地预测他们的总体成本。反过来,他们认为,公开价格信息也会鼓励供应商提供更具竞争力的价格,从而减少多余的医疗支出。然而,其他保健服务研究表明,促进价格透明度的立法和监管努力可能导致保健费用增加,这取决于市场条件和所针对的各种利益攸关方。因此,任何价格透明度倡议不仅必须使价格透明,而且还必须考虑到市场之间的差异,要么通过减少阻碍价格透明度发挥作用的经济低效,要么只针对市场支持这种倡议的特定地区。本文分析了价格透明度举措是否可以有效地用于降低医疗保健成本,如果可以,必须满足哪些条件才能这样做。精心设计的价格透明计划的特征将根据目标人群(患者、雇主、提供者或保险公司)和目标市场的特定特征而有所不同。我们认为,最有效的解决方案将强制要求在适当的利益相关者层面披露价格和质量信息,同时打破供应商的市场杠杆,因为它阻碍了价格透明度对消费者的帮助。这两个因素加在一起有可能降低医疗保健成本。最后,我们提出了四种可能的价格透明度举措,它们代表了促进有效价格透明度的一系列可能途径,包括诉讼、立法、监管和消费者驱动的举措。