Usability Evaluation of Online Learning Management System: Comparison between Blackboard and Canvas

M. J. Gumasing, Abigail B. Vasquez, Angelo Luis S. Doctora, W. D. Perez
{"title":"Usability Evaluation of Online Learning Management System: Comparison between Blackboard and Canvas","authors":"M. J. Gumasing, Abigail B. Vasquez, Angelo Luis S. Doctora, W. D. Perez","doi":"10.1145/3523132.3523137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A learning management system is a convenient software that improves and enhances educators' and students' educational engagement and learning. This learning management system organizes the different course materials, provides accessibility to the learning materials, easily traces the students' performance, and integrates the social learning engagement. The study aims to compare the usability of Blackboard and Canvas based on user satisfaction of the students, evaluate the usability of the two learning management systems, and determine the acceptability score of Blackboard and Canvas. The researchers used a system usability scale questionnaire to assess the usability of Blackboard and Canvas based on the computed acceptability score from the data collected. This study also used other statistical tools such as descriptive statistics and t-test analysis to identify a significant difference between Blackboard and Canvas. Through this tool, the researchers concluded that there is no significant difference between the usability and satisfaction of the two learning management systems.","PeriodicalId":109028,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (Europe)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (Europe)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3523132.3523137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A learning management system is a convenient software that improves and enhances educators' and students' educational engagement and learning. This learning management system organizes the different course materials, provides accessibility to the learning materials, easily traces the students' performance, and integrates the social learning engagement. The study aims to compare the usability of Blackboard and Canvas based on user satisfaction of the students, evaluate the usability of the two learning management systems, and determine the acceptability score of Blackboard and Canvas. The researchers used a system usability scale questionnaire to assess the usability of Blackboard and Canvas based on the computed acceptability score from the data collected. This study also used other statistical tools such as descriptive statistics and t-test analysis to identify a significant difference between Blackboard and Canvas. Through this tool, the researchers concluded that there is no significant difference between the usability and satisfaction of the two learning management systems.
在线学习管理系统的可用性评价:黑板与画布的比较
学习管理系统是一种方便的软件,可以改善和增强教育者和学生的教育参与和学习。该学习管理系统对不同的课程材料进行组织,提供学习材料的可访问性,方便地跟踪学生的学习表现,并整合社会学习参与。本研究旨在根据学生的用户满意度,比较Blackboard和Canvas的可用性,评估两种学习管理系统的可用性,并确定Blackboard和Canvas的可接受性分数。研究人员使用系统可用性量表问卷,根据收集到的数据计算出的可接受性分数来评估Blackboard和Canvas的可用性。本研究还使用了其他统计工具,如描述性统计和t检验分析,以确定黑板和画布之间的显著差异。通过这个工具,研究人员得出结论,两种学习管理系统的可用性和满意度没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信