Comparative Study of Face Detection Methods for Robust Face Recognition Systems

Thilinda Edirisooriya, E. Jayatunga
{"title":"Comparative Study of Face Detection Methods for Robust Face Recognition Systems","authors":"Thilinda Edirisooriya, E. Jayatunga","doi":"10.1109/SLAAI-ICAI54477.2021.9664689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Face detection systems are used in various computer vision-based applications such as biometrics, security, surveillance, etc. Computationally immoderate face detection methods may not be convenient for devices with inadequate resources. On the other hand, an appropriate face detection approach should be considered in order to achieve high accuracy and substantial performance. This paper deliberates different methods of facial detection and contrasts them to find a better approach for a robust facial recognition system. Five methods of face detection were used in this comparison namely, ViolaJones, Histogram of Oriented Gradient with Support Vector Machine (HOG-SVM), Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Network (MTCNN), Single Shot Multibox Detector (SSD) and Maxmargin Object Detection (MMOD). Each method was evaluated by varying illumination intensity, angle of the face, the scale of the face and different occlusion types. Video data and WIDERFACE image samples were used for the analysis. Obtained experimental results depict that SSD performs better on the task of face detection with high accuracy and performance, while MMOD has the lowest performance and Viola-Jones gives the lowest accuracy.","PeriodicalId":252006,"journal":{"name":"2021 5th SLAAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SLAAI-ICAI)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 5th SLAAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SLAAI-ICAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SLAAI-ICAI54477.2021.9664689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Face detection systems are used in various computer vision-based applications such as biometrics, security, surveillance, etc. Computationally immoderate face detection methods may not be convenient for devices with inadequate resources. On the other hand, an appropriate face detection approach should be considered in order to achieve high accuracy and substantial performance. This paper deliberates different methods of facial detection and contrasts them to find a better approach for a robust facial recognition system. Five methods of face detection were used in this comparison namely, ViolaJones, Histogram of Oriented Gradient with Support Vector Machine (HOG-SVM), Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Network (MTCNN), Single Shot Multibox Detector (SSD) and Maxmargin Object Detection (MMOD). Each method was evaluated by varying illumination intensity, angle of the face, the scale of the face and different occlusion types. Video data and WIDERFACE image samples were used for the analysis. Obtained experimental results depict that SSD performs better on the task of face detection with high accuracy and performance, while MMOD has the lowest performance and Viola-Jones gives the lowest accuracy.
鲁棒人脸识别系统中人脸检测方法的比较研究
人脸检测系统用于各种基于计算机视觉的应用,如生物识别、安全、监视等。计算量过大的人脸检测方法对于资源不足的设备可能不方便。另一方面,为了达到较高的准确率和较好的性能,需要考虑一种合适的人脸检测方法。本文研究了不同的人脸检测方法,并对它们进行了对比,以找到一种更好的鲁棒人脸识别系统。本次比较使用了ViolaJones、HOG-SVM、Multi-task cascading Convolutional Network (MTCNN)、Single Shot Multibox Detector (SSD)和Maxmargin Object detection (MMOD)五种人脸检测方法。通过改变光照强度、人脸角度、人脸尺度和不同遮挡类型对每种方法进行评估。使用视频数据和WIDERFACE图像样本进行分析。得到的实验结果表明,SSD在人脸检测任务上表现较好,具有较高的准确率和性能,而MMOD的性能最低,Viola-Jones的准确率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信