A Theoretical Approach to Welfare-Optimal Calculation of Direct Costs in European Rail Regulation

Marco Henseler
{"title":"A Theoretical Approach to Welfare-Optimal Calculation of Direct Costs in European Rail Regulation","authors":"Marco Henseler","doi":"10.5296/JPAG.V11I1.18282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The regulation of track access charges within the European Union is based on the economic principles of first and second best pricing. In order to obtain an allocative efficiency it is crucial to determine the marginal costs of operating the train services – the so-called direct costs. Even though the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/909 specifies the modalities for the calculation of direct costs, a broad range of different values for direct costs can be observed across Member States. However, the discussion of the level of direct costs is driven in particular by econometric, engineering and cost accounting aspects – an economic analysis is missing despite the welfare-economic concept of track access charges. For that reason, this paper discusses the welfare economic effects of different suitable values for direct costs. It will be shown that both a welfare maximising first best track access charging and, in most cases, also a second best charging will result in boundary solutions for direct costs. However, it also becomes obvious that from a welfare-economic perspective there is no general recommendation for adopting the lowest suitable direct costs. Any allocatively efficient regulation of track access charges must consequently consider the specific situation of each market segment separately.","PeriodicalId":360263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Administration and Governance","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Administration and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/JPAG.V11I1.18282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The regulation of track access charges within the European Union is based on the economic principles of first and second best pricing. In order to obtain an allocative efficiency it is crucial to determine the marginal costs of operating the train services – the so-called direct costs. Even though the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/909 specifies the modalities for the calculation of direct costs, a broad range of different values for direct costs can be observed across Member States. However, the discussion of the level of direct costs is driven in particular by econometric, engineering and cost accounting aspects – an economic analysis is missing despite the welfare-economic concept of track access charges. For that reason, this paper discusses the welfare economic effects of different suitable values for direct costs. It will be shown that both a welfare maximising first best track access charging and, in most cases, also a second best charging will result in boundary solutions for direct costs. However, it also becomes obvious that from a welfare-economic perspective there is no general recommendation for adopting the lowest suitable direct costs. Any allocatively efficient regulation of track access charges must consequently consider the specific situation of each market segment separately.
欧洲铁路监管中直接成本福利最优计算的理论方法
欧洲联盟内部的轨道使用费管制是基于第一和第二最佳定价的经济原则。为了获得分配效率,确定运营列车服务的边际成本——即所谓的直接成本是至关重要的。尽管实施条例(EU) 2015/909规定了直接成本的计算方式,但各成员国可以观察到直接成本的广泛不同值。然而,关于直接成本水平的讨论主要是由计量经济学、工程学和成本会计方面推动的- -尽管有轨道使用费的福利经济概念,但缺少经济分析。为此,本文讨论了不同直接成本适宜值的福利经济效应。这将表明,福利最大化的第一最佳轨道访问收费和在大多数情况下,第二最佳收费将导致直接成本的边界解决方案。然而,同样明显的是,从福利经济的角度来看,没有关于采用最低的适当直接费用的一般性建议。因此,任何有效的轨道使用费分配规则都必须分别考虑每个细分市场的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信