Florian Aichinger, M.-H. Beddelem, G. Germain, Louis Hirsinger, L. Gerbaud, R. Studer
{"title":"Drilling Inside Fiberglass Casing, Wear Prediction and Management in Geothermal Wells","authors":"Florian Aichinger, M.-H. Beddelem, G. Germain, Louis Hirsinger, L. Gerbaud, R. Studer","doi":"10.2118/209848-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Due to corrosive fluids being expected in the geothermal wells planned for the Champigny (Paris) district heating, fiberglass casing was used. It was deemed beneficial, if drilling operations could be performed with an exposed fiberglass casing, despite high expected wear.\n This paper will lay out how a feasible strategy was planned, utilizing advanced wear prediction techniques for drilling inside fiberglass casing.\n The study was conducted by CFG (compagnie Française de Géothermie) and funded by ADEME (Agence de la transition écologique)\n \n \n \n To achieve an accurate wear prediction three parameters are required: (1) Trajectory and actual tortuosity (2) Wear factors (3) Operations (number of rotations and distance slided).\n Tortuosity was calibrated on offset wells (Aichinger, 2021) and expected operations were covered in scenario analyses.\n Wear factors were determined using field calibration and laboratory testing. The field calibration was performed on three offset wells using an internal diameter interpretation method in which the wear is measured against the most probable elliptical casing shape and herby allowing wear measurement avoiding bias error. (Aichinger, 2016) The laboratory tests were conducted in Mines ParisTech / Armines including different fiberglass types, protectors, sideforce amplitude, rotation speed and lubricant.\n Based on the derived parameters various drilling scenarios and the associated wear levels were simulated to decide on a drilling strategy.\n \n \n \n The main results are:\n The main conclusions are:\n \n \n \n This paper should provide help to Engineers who plan to perform drilling operations inside fiberglass casing, mainly by providing Wear Factors, but also general guidelines on wear prediction and mitigation techniques.\n","PeriodicalId":385340,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, August 09, 2022","volume":"570 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, August 09, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209848-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to corrosive fluids being expected in the geothermal wells planned for the Champigny (Paris) district heating, fiberglass casing was used. It was deemed beneficial, if drilling operations could be performed with an exposed fiberglass casing, despite high expected wear.
This paper will lay out how a feasible strategy was planned, utilizing advanced wear prediction techniques for drilling inside fiberglass casing.
The study was conducted by CFG (compagnie Française de Géothermie) and funded by ADEME (Agence de la transition écologique)
To achieve an accurate wear prediction three parameters are required: (1) Trajectory and actual tortuosity (2) Wear factors (3) Operations (number of rotations and distance slided).
Tortuosity was calibrated on offset wells (Aichinger, 2021) and expected operations were covered in scenario analyses.
Wear factors were determined using field calibration and laboratory testing. The field calibration was performed on three offset wells using an internal diameter interpretation method in which the wear is measured against the most probable elliptical casing shape and herby allowing wear measurement avoiding bias error. (Aichinger, 2016) The laboratory tests were conducted in Mines ParisTech / Armines including different fiberglass types, protectors, sideforce amplitude, rotation speed and lubricant.
Based on the derived parameters various drilling scenarios and the associated wear levels were simulated to decide on a drilling strategy.
The main results are:
The main conclusions are:
This paper should provide help to Engineers who plan to perform drilling operations inside fiberglass casing, mainly by providing Wear Factors, but also general guidelines on wear prediction and mitigation techniques.
由于巴黎Champigny区域供热计划的地热井中可能存在腐蚀性流体,因此使用了玻璃纤维套管。如果钻井作业可以使用外露的玻璃纤维套管,尽管预计会有很大的磨损,这被认为是有益的。本文将介绍如何利用先进的磨损预测技术在玻璃纤维套管内钻井,制定可行的策略。该研究由CFG (compannie franaise de gsamothermie)进行,ADEME (Agence de la transition)资助。为了实现准确的磨损预测,需要三个参数:(1)轨迹和实际扭曲度(2)磨损因子(3)操作(旋转次数和滑动距离)。在邻井中对扭度进行了校准(Aichinger, 2021年),并在情景分析中涵盖了预期的操作。磨损系数通过现场校准和实验室测试确定。使用内径解释方法对三口邻井进行了现场校准,该方法根据最可能的椭圆套管形状测量磨损,从而允许磨损测量避免偏差。(Aichinger, 2016)在Mines ParisTech / Armines进行了实验室测试,包括不同的玻璃纤维类型,保护器,侧力振幅,转速和润滑剂。基于导出的参数,模拟了各种钻井场景和相关磨损水平,以确定钻井策略。主要结论如下:本文主要通过提供磨损因素,以及磨损预测和缓解技术的一般指南,为计划在玻璃纤维套管内进行钻井作业的工程师提供帮助。