Crisis and Decline in Bunyoro Population and Environment in Western Uganda, 1860-1955 (review)

J. Willis
{"title":"Crisis and Decline in Bunyoro Population and Environment in Western Uganda, 1860-1955 (review)","authors":"J. Willis","doi":"10.1353/afr.2007.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"resources are managed by clans rather than by the community as a whole. Difference between the two groups extends to the ways in which they interpret and seek to deal with misfortune. While Pokot make a clear connection between internal strife and external threat and stress the importance of community rituals in maintaining social harmony and cohesion as a defence against disaster, Himba tend to accept that natural hazards are largely unfathomable and must simply be endured with the support of patrons and lineage. Pokot see themselves as active agents, responsible for their own fate and able up to a point to predict and ward off misfortune. They raid and are raided by the ‘enemies’ that surround them, and their perception of the world is shaped by a recognition of its volatility. Himba, however, see themselves as peaceable people inhabiting a stable environment that is threatened only by the incursions of others and the unpredictability of nature. One disadvantage of the comparison is that, despite their wide geographical and cultural distance, both societies share a common marginality. This tends to exclude consideration of other factors, such as the differential access to ‘national’ political or economic resources, to wider markets and to non-pastoral options that are now characteristic of more incorporated and stratified pastoral communities. However, the book is structured in such a way as to make it possible for readers familiar with other societies to include these factors and ask their own questions of them. Pastoral specialists will probably find Bollig’s conclusions solidly based and well-argued rather than surprising, but some challenge more widely held assumptions about the fate of pastoralism. The discussion of the difficulties of resource protection should be required reading for environmental NGOs, and Bollig is surely right in downplaying wealth as a factor in itself. Poorer herders seem able to survive as well as the rich. Indeed, the fact that poorer households are not expelled from pastoralism may be an important cause of the population pressure and proliferation of small units that is perhaps the major threat to Pokot survival. Specialists will also find the sheer mass of detail in the case studies intriguing and valuable, but more general readers will appreciate the first and last chapters that provide first a lucid discussion of the concepts of risk, hazard and uncertainty on which much recent discussion has centred and then a balanced comparative overview of pastoral risk management. While aimed at specialists, the book is accessible to aid personnel – a not unimportant consideration since one of the hazards faced by pastoralists is development initiatives that ignore, bypass or undermine the coping strategies that Bollig discusses. The book would, however, have benefited from tighter editing to eliminate omissions and repetitions and to focus the short summary sections more sharply.","PeriodicalId":337749,"journal":{"name":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afr.2007.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

resources are managed by clans rather than by the community as a whole. Difference between the two groups extends to the ways in which they interpret and seek to deal with misfortune. While Pokot make a clear connection between internal strife and external threat and stress the importance of community rituals in maintaining social harmony and cohesion as a defence against disaster, Himba tend to accept that natural hazards are largely unfathomable and must simply be endured with the support of patrons and lineage. Pokot see themselves as active agents, responsible for their own fate and able up to a point to predict and ward off misfortune. They raid and are raided by the ‘enemies’ that surround them, and their perception of the world is shaped by a recognition of its volatility. Himba, however, see themselves as peaceable people inhabiting a stable environment that is threatened only by the incursions of others and the unpredictability of nature. One disadvantage of the comparison is that, despite their wide geographical and cultural distance, both societies share a common marginality. This tends to exclude consideration of other factors, such as the differential access to ‘national’ political or economic resources, to wider markets and to non-pastoral options that are now characteristic of more incorporated and stratified pastoral communities. However, the book is structured in such a way as to make it possible for readers familiar with other societies to include these factors and ask their own questions of them. Pastoral specialists will probably find Bollig’s conclusions solidly based and well-argued rather than surprising, but some challenge more widely held assumptions about the fate of pastoralism. The discussion of the difficulties of resource protection should be required reading for environmental NGOs, and Bollig is surely right in downplaying wealth as a factor in itself. Poorer herders seem able to survive as well as the rich. Indeed, the fact that poorer households are not expelled from pastoralism may be an important cause of the population pressure and proliferation of small units that is perhaps the major threat to Pokot survival. Specialists will also find the sheer mass of detail in the case studies intriguing and valuable, but more general readers will appreciate the first and last chapters that provide first a lucid discussion of the concepts of risk, hazard and uncertainty on which much recent discussion has centred and then a balanced comparative overview of pastoral risk management. While aimed at specialists, the book is accessible to aid personnel – a not unimportant consideration since one of the hazards faced by pastoralists is development initiatives that ignore, bypass or undermine the coping strategies that Bollig discusses. The book would, however, have benefited from tighter editing to eliminate omissions and repetitions and to focus the short summary sections more sharply.
1860-1955年乌干达西部Bunyoro人口与环境的危机与衰退(回顾)
资源由氏族管理,而不是由整个社区管理。这两个群体之间的差异延伸到他们解释和寻求处理不幸的方式。波克特人明确指出了内部冲突和外部威胁之间的联系,并强调了社区仪式在维持社会和谐和凝聚力方面的重要性,以此抵御灾难,而辛巴人则倾向于接受自然灾害在很大程度上是不可思议的,必须在赞助人和血统的支持下才能忍受。波客们认为自己是积极的行动者,对自己的命运负责,在一定程度上能够预测和避免不幸。他们袭击周围的“敌人”,也被他们袭击,他们对世界的感知是由对世界波动的认识形成的。然而,辛巴人认为自己是和平的人民,居住在一个稳定的环境中,这种环境只受到其他人的入侵和自然的不可预测性的威胁。这种比较的一个缺点是,尽管两国地理和文化距离遥远,但两国社会都有共同的边缘性。这往往排除了对其他因素的考虑,例如获得“国家”政治或经济资源的不同机会,进入更广阔的市场和非牧区选择,这些是非牧区选择现在是更加合并和分层的牧区社区的特征。然而,这本书的结构使熟悉其他社会的读者有可能包括这些因素,并提出他们自己的问题。畜牧专家可能会觉得博利格的结论有坚实的基础,而且论证得很充分,而不是令人惊讶,但一些人对有关畜牧业命运的更广泛的假设提出了质疑。关于资源保护困难的讨论应该是环保非政府组织的必读之书,博利淡化财富本身的影响无疑是正确的。较穷的牧民似乎也能像富人一样生存。事实上,较贫穷的家庭没有被驱逐出畜牧业,这可能是造成人口压力和小单位扩散的一个重要原因,而小单位可能是波克特生存的主要威胁。专家们也会发现案例研究中的大量细节有趣而有价值,但更多的普通读者会欣赏第一章和最后几章,它们首先对风险、危害和不确定性的概念进行了清晰的讨论,这些概念是最近讨论的中心,然后对牧区风险管理进行了平衡的比较概述。虽然这本书的目标读者是专家,但援助人员也可以读到——这一点并非不重要,因为牧民面临的危险之一是忽视、绕过或破坏博利所讨论的应对策略的发展计划。然而,这本书将受益于更严格的编辑,以消除遗漏和重复,并更突出简短的总结部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信