Diferencias práxicas según subtipos de deterioro cognitivo en un grupo de pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson avanzada

D. Montoya-Arenas, Luz D. Garzón-Giraldo, Nohemy Correa-López, Julián Carvajal-Castrillón
{"title":"Diferencias práxicas según subtipos de deterioro cognitivo en un grupo de pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson avanzada","authors":"D. Montoya-Arenas, Luz D. Garzón-Giraldo, Nohemy Correa-López, Julián Carvajal-Castrillón","doi":"10.18566/medupb.v38n2.a04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We talk about advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) when conventional therapy does not provide motor control. Praxis alterations have been described in these patients as part of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from early stages. The objective of this work is to determine the difference between praxis alterations and the subtype of DCL in a group of patients with advanced PD. Methodology: cross-sectional observational-analytical design in patients with PD examined in consultation for neuropsychological evaluation in 2014. The diagnostic categories were compared according to the apraxic predominance. In addition, we explored if there was a relationship between praxis alterations and posterior cortical vs. Frontosubcortical predominance. Three groups were categorized: group 1) Non-amnestic-executive monodomain DCL, group 2) Apraxic and executive dominance multi-domain DCL, and group 3) Multi-domain DCL –with more than two altered cognitive domains–. Results: there was a greater predominance of body and visuoconstructional apraxies in groups 2 and 3. The findings show differences when comparing praxical abilities between subgroups (p <0.05), as well as a pattern of gradual performance decrease in tests according to subtype of DCL. No relationship was found between the groups for posterior cortical and frontosubcortical predominance in body praxias. There werehigher levels of posterior cortical involvement in group 3 than in group 2, for ideomotorpraxias (right and left) and ideational praxias. There was a relationship between the presence of visuocontructional apraxias and frontosubcortical dysfunction (p <0.01) in the three groups. Conclusions: Participants with advanced PD could present praxis alterations that are not characteristic of dementia. We confirm that apraxia is possible in patients with MCI without dementia, due to minor lesions of the parietal cortex that do not explain major functional loss.","PeriodicalId":109682,"journal":{"name":"Medicina UPB","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina UPB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18566/medupb.v38n2.a04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We talk about advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) when conventional therapy does not provide motor control. Praxis alterations have been described in these patients as part of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from early stages. The objective of this work is to determine the difference between praxis alterations and the subtype of DCL in a group of patients with advanced PD. Methodology: cross-sectional observational-analytical design in patients with PD examined in consultation for neuropsychological evaluation in 2014. The diagnostic categories were compared according to the apraxic predominance. In addition, we explored if there was a relationship between praxis alterations and posterior cortical vs. Frontosubcortical predominance. Three groups were categorized: group 1) Non-amnestic-executive monodomain DCL, group 2) Apraxic and executive dominance multi-domain DCL, and group 3) Multi-domain DCL –with more than two altered cognitive domains–. Results: there was a greater predominance of body and visuoconstructional apraxies in groups 2 and 3. The findings show differences when comparing praxical abilities between subgroups (p <0.05), as well as a pattern of gradual performance decrease in tests according to subtype of DCL. No relationship was found between the groups for posterior cortical and frontosubcortical predominance in body praxias. There werehigher levels of posterior cortical involvement in group 3 than in group 2, for ideomotorpraxias (right and left) and ideational praxias. There was a relationship between the presence of visuocontructional apraxias and frontosubcortical dysfunction (p <0.01) in the three groups. Conclusions: Participants with advanced PD could present praxis alterations that are not characteristic of dementia. We confirm that apraxia is possible in patients with MCI without dementia, due to minor lesions of the parietal cortex that do not explain major functional loss.
一组晚期帕金森病患者认知障碍亚型的实践差异
目的:探讨常规治疗不能提供运动控制的晚期帕金森病(PD)。这些患者的行为改变被描述为早期轻度认知障碍(MCI)的一部分。这项工作的目的是确定一组晚期PD患者实践改变和DCL亚型之间的差异。方法:采用横断面观察分析设计对2014年PD患者进行神经心理学评估咨询。根据失用优势对诊断类别进行比较。此外,我们还探讨了实践改变与后皮质优势和额皮质下优势之间是否存在关系。三组分别为:1组非遗忘-执行单域DCL, 2组失用和执行主导多域DCL, 3组2个以上认知域改变的多域DCL。结果:第2组和第3组以身体和视觉建构行为为主。结果表明,在比较不同亚组之间的实践能力时存在差异(p <0.05),并且根据DCL亚型,测试中的表现逐渐下降。在身体活动中,后皮层优势和额皮质下优势组之间没有关系。在意念性失用(左、右)和意念性失用中,3组的后皮层受累程度高于2组。三组视觉建构性失用与额皮质下功能障碍存在相关性(p <0.01)。结论:晚期PD患者可能出现非痴呆特征的实践改变。我们证实失用症可能发生在MCI患者中,但没有痴呆,因为顶叶皮层的轻微损伤不能解释主要的功能丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信