Price Discovery in the U.S. Treasury Cash Market: On Principal Trading Firms and Dealers

J. Harkrader, Michael P. Puglia
{"title":"Price Discovery in the U.S. Treasury Cash Market: On Principal Trading Firms and Dealers","authors":"J. Harkrader, Michael P. Puglia","doi":"10.17016/FEDS.2020.096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explore the following question: does the trading activity of registered dealers on Treasury interdealer broker (IDB) platforms differ from that of principal trading firms (PTFs), and if so, how and to what effect on market liquidity? To do so, we use a novel dataset that combines Treasury cash transaction reports from FINRA's Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) and publicly available limit order book data from BrokerTec. We find that trades conducted in a limit order book setting have high permanent price impact when a PTF is the passive party, playing the role of liquidity provider. Conversely, we find that dealer trades have higher price impact when the dealer is the aggressive party, playing the role of liquidity taker. Trades in which multiple firms (whether dealers or PTFs) participate on one or both sides, however, have relatively low price impact. We interpret these results in light of theoretical models suggesting that traders with only a \"small\" informational advantage prefer to use (passive) limit orders, while traders with a comparatively large informational advantage prefer to use (aggressive) market orders. We also analyze the events that occurred in Treasury markets in March 2020, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":278071,"journal":{"name":"Board of Governors: Finance & Economics Discussion Series (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Board of Governors: Finance & Economics Discussion Series (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2020.096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We explore the following question: does the trading activity of registered dealers on Treasury interdealer broker (IDB) platforms differ from that of principal trading firms (PTFs), and if so, how and to what effect on market liquidity? To do so, we use a novel dataset that combines Treasury cash transaction reports from FINRA's Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) and publicly available limit order book data from BrokerTec. We find that trades conducted in a limit order book setting have high permanent price impact when a PTF is the passive party, playing the role of liquidity provider. Conversely, we find that dealer trades have higher price impact when the dealer is the aggressive party, playing the role of liquidity taker. Trades in which multiple firms (whether dealers or PTFs) participate on one or both sides, however, have relatively low price impact. We interpret these results in light of theoretical models suggesting that traders with only a "small" informational advantage prefer to use (passive) limit orders, while traders with a comparatively large informational advantage prefer to use (aggressive) market orders. We also analyze the events that occurred in Treasury markets in March 2020, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
美国国债现货市场的价格发现:主要交易公司和交易商
我们探讨了以下问题:注册交易商在国债交易商间经纪商(IDB)平台上的交易活动与主要交易公司(ptf)的交易活动是否不同,如果不同,对市场流动性的影响如何以及有什么影响?为此,我们使用了一个新的数据集,该数据集结合了来自FINRA的交易报告和合规引擎(TRACE)的财政部现金交易报告和来自BrokerTec的公开限价订单数据。我们发现,当PTF作为被动方,扮演流动性提供者的角色时,在限价单设置下进行的交易具有较高的永久性价格影响。相反,我们发现当交易商是激进方,扮演流动性接受者的角色时,交易商交易对价格的影响更大。然而,多家公司(无论是交易商还是ptf)在一方或双方参与的交易对价格的影响相对较低。我们根据理论模型来解释这些结果,理论模型表明,只有“小”信息优势的交易者更喜欢使用(被动)限价单,而具有相对较大信息优势的交易者更喜欢使用(积极)市场订单。我们还分析了2020年3月COVID-19大流行爆发期间美国国债市场发生的事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信