N. Jepsen, S. Pedersen, E. Thorstad
{"title":"Behavioural interactions between prey (trout smolts) and predators (pike and pikeperch) in an impounded river","authors":"N. Jepsen, S. Pedersen, E. Thorstad","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(200003/04)16:2<189::AID-RRR570>3.0.CO;2-N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Movements of radio-tagged pike Esox lucius (L.), pikeperch Stizostedion lucioperca (L.) and outward migrating sea trout smolts Salmo trutta (L.) were studied in a shallow Danish reservoir to obtain information of predator–prey interactions between these species. Twenty pikeperch (55–74 cm) and 19 pike (52–72 cm) were tagged. Female pikeperch spent more time near the outlet sluice during the smolt run (May) than at other times of the year, apparently actively hunting the smolts delayed in this area. In contrast, male pikeperch did not seem to participate in the smolt predation but remained stationary during the smolt run, presumably guarding their nests. Most tagged pike were present at the spawning grounds during the peak of the smolt run, where they had little chance of smolt encounter. Twenty migrating trout smolts were radio-tagged in the river upstream of the reservoir. Ten of these were located in the vicinity of the outlet sluice at least once, but were unwilling or unable to find and enter the sub-surface outlet sluice. Only one tagged smolt left the reservoir. After 1–12 days in the reservoir, the remaining smolts were eaten by pikeperch or pike and the results indicate that female pikeperch and few female pike have adjusted their behaviour to predation on smolts during the smolt run. The smolt predation in this man-made reservoir is higher than in natural lakes, probably due to the changed physical environment and introduced predators, such as pikeperch. The outlet sluice practice and the temporal overlap between smolt run and predator-spawning may be key factors in smolt survival. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"89","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(200003/04)16:2<189::AID-RRR570>3.0.CO;2-N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 89
在被扣押的河流中,猎物(鳟鱼幼崽)和捕食者(梭子鱼和梭子鱼)之间的行为相互作用
在丹麦浅水水库中研究了放射性标记梭鱼Esox lucius (L.)、梭鱼Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)和向外洄游的海鳟幼鱼Salmo trutta (L.)的活动,以获取这些物种之间捕食-猎物相互作用的信息。标记了20条长55 ~ 74 cm的梭鱼和19条长52 ~ 72 cm的梭鱼。雌梭鲈在幼鱼洄游期间(5月)比一年中的其他时间花在出口水闸附近的时间更多,显然是在积极地捕食在这个地区被推迟的幼鱼。相比之下,雄性刺鲈似乎不参与幼崽的捕食,而是在幼崽奔跑期间保持静止,可能是为了保护它们的巢穴。大多数带标签的梭子鱼在幼鱼洄游的高峰期出现在产卵地,在那里它们很少有机会遇到幼鱼。在水库上游的河流中对20只洄游的鳟鱼幼崽进行了无线电标记。其中10个至少一次位于出口水闸附近,但不愿或无法找到并进入地下出口水闸。只有一只被标记的幼崽离开了水库。在水库中停留1-12天后,剩余的幼崽被棘鲈或梭子鱼吃掉,结果表明雌性棘鲈和少数雌性梭子鱼在幼崽洄游期间调整了捕食行为。人工水库的幼鱼捕食率高于天然湖泊,这可能是由于自然环境的变化和天敌的引入,如刺鲈。出水闸的做法和幼鱼洄游与捕食者产卵的时间重叠可能是幼鱼存活的关键因素。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。