One misfortune is better than thousands of pieces of advice: the warning role of rectal bleeding

Yagmur Akbulut, C. Yeşiloğlu, Sebnem Altinkalem, O. Akdoğan, S. Yazgan, D. Gokmen, İsmail Çalikoğlu, M. Akkoca, S. Tokgöz, M. Kuzu
{"title":"One misfortune is better than thousands of pieces of advice: the warning role of rectal bleeding","authors":"Yagmur Akbulut, C. Yeşiloğlu, Sebnem Altinkalem, O. Akdoğan, S. Yazgan, D. Gokmen, İsmail Çalikoğlu, M. Akkoca, S. Tokgöz, M. Kuzu","doi":"10.5455/aces.20180804105910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Rectal bleeding is one of the most important symptoms of colorectal cancer that fast-tracks the patient’s consultation with a physician. This study aims to assess the warning role of rectal bleeding in a risk group for colorectal cancer. Besides, the relationship among awareness, various socio-demographic criteria and the reasons for visiting or not visiting the physician was evaluated among greater than or equal to 40 years old. \nMethods: This descriptive study was conducted thousand one hundred and sixteen (1116) individuals greater than or equal to 40 years old. Awareness of rectal bleeding as a warning sign in participating individuals was assessed by a questionnaire in addition to their family history of cancer or polyps and reasons for visiting or not visiting a physician. \nResults: A prior history of rectal bleeding was found in 51.9% of subjects. Among those with rectal bleeding history, the rate of visiting a physician due to this bleeding was 49.7%. No statistically significant relationship was found between the frequency of those who contacted their physician and gender, education or age. The frequency of visiting a physician was significantly higher among individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer as compared with no family history and was directly proportional to the degree of family relationship (p = 0.007). \nConclusion: Even rectal bleeding does not raise enough attention for visiting a physician. Therefore, public education and screening still have paramount importance in the prevention of colorectal cancer.","PeriodicalId":371099,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical and Experimental Surgery (ACES)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical and Experimental Surgery (ACES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aces.20180804105910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Rectal bleeding is one of the most important symptoms of colorectal cancer that fast-tracks the patient’s consultation with a physician. This study aims to assess the warning role of rectal bleeding in a risk group for colorectal cancer. Besides, the relationship among awareness, various socio-demographic criteria and the reasons for visiting or not visiting the physician was evaluated among greater than or equal to 40 years old. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted thousand one hundred and sixteen (1116) individuals greater than or equal to 40 years old. Awareness of rectal bleeding as a warning sign in participating individuals was assessed by a questionnaire in addition to their family history of cancer or polyps and reasons for visiting or not visiting a physician. Results: A prior history of rectal bleeding was found in 51.9% of subjects. Among those with rectal bleeding history, the rate of visiting a physician due to this bleeding was 49.7%. No statistically significant relationship was found between the frequency of those who contacted their physician and gender, education or age. The frequency of visiting a physician was significantly higher among individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer as compared with no family history and was directly proportional to the degree of family relationship (p = 0.007). Conclusion: Even rectal bleeding does not raise enough attention for visiting a physician. Therefore, public education and screening still have paramount importance in the prevention of colorectal cancer.
一个不幸胜过千万条忠告:直肠出血的警示作用
目的:直肠出血是结直肠癌最重要的症状之一,可以快速跟踪患者与医生的咨询。本研究旨在评估直肠出血在结直肠癌高危人群中的警示作用。此外,对年龄在40岁及40岁以上的人群进行认知、各项社会人口学指标与就诊或不就诊原因之间的关系评价。方法:对1116名年龄大于或等于40岁的人进行了描述性研究。除了癌症或息肉家族史以及看医生或不看医生的原因外,还通过问卷调查评估了参与者对直肠出血作为警告信号的认识。结果:51.9%的受试者有直肠出血史。在有直肠出血史的患者中,因直肠出血就诊的比例为49.7%。与医生联系的频率与性别、教育程度或年龄之间没有统计学上的显著关系。有结直肠癌家族史的个体就诊频率明显高于无结直肠癌家族史的个体,且与家族关系程度成正比(p = 0.007)。结论:即使直肠出血也没有引起足够的重视。因此,公众教育和筛查在预防结直肠癌中仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信