Interior Whiteness: Race and the "Rise of the Novel"

S. Eldridge
{"title":"Interior Whiteness: Race and the \"Rise of the Novel\"","authors":"S. Eldridge","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2023.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"critical Whiteness studies in the German context has thus far not examined the literature of the Goethezeit with the same detail as the philosophy of the period or literature and culture of later eras. This discipline also frequently draws on foundational work from the anglo-american context; Julia Roth remarks that “most German texts on Critical Whiteness relate themselves (at least on the margins) to Toni morrison’s publications.”1 indeed, although Toni morrison’s 1992 Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination is concerned specifically with how an “africanist presence” emerges in and defines literature by white american authors in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, she poses a series of questions and calls for further examination that i see as entirely applicable to other (pre)national literatures and periods as well.2 in her preface, morrison questions the relationship between race and notions of humanistic or universal literature: “How is ‘literary whiteness’ and ‘literary blackness’ made, and what is the consequence of that construction? How do embedded assumptions of racial (not racist) language work in the literary enterprise that hopes and sometimes claims to be ‘humanistic?’” (xii–xiii) Later in the text, she offers an explicit series of calls for projects that she views as essential to understanding literary whiteness. morrison asks, “in what ways does the imaginative encounter with africanism enable white writers to think about themselves?”3 she then elaborates on this question by outlining multiple areas for future study:","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Goethe Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2023.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

critical Whiteness studies in the German context has thus far not examined the literature of the Goethezeit with the same detail as the philosophy of the period or literature and culture of later eras. This discipline also frequently draws on foundational work from the anglo-american context; Julia Roth remarks that “most German texts on Critical Whiteness relate themselves (at least on the margins) to Toni morrison’s publications.”1 indeed, although Toni morrison’s 1992 Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination is concerned specifically with how an “africanist presence” emerges in and defines literature by white american authors in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, she poses a series of questions and calls for further examination that i see as entirely applicable to other (pre)national literatures and periods as well.2 in her preface, morrison questions the relationship between race and notions of humanistic or universal literature: “How is ‘literary whiteness’ and ‘literary blackness’ made, and what is the consequence of that construction? How do embedded assumptions of racial (not racist) language work in the literary enterprise that hopes and sometimes claims to be ‘humanistic?’” (xii–xiii) Later in the text, she offers an explicit series of calls for projects that she views as essential to understanding literary whiteness. morrison asks, “in what ways does the imaginative encounter with africanism enable white writers to think about themselves?”3 she then elaborates on this question by outlining multiple areas for future study:
内心的白:种族与“小说的兴起”
到目前为止,德国背景下的批判性白人研究还没有像研究那个时期的哲学或后来的文学和文化那样详细地研究歌德时代的文学。这一学科也经常借鉴英美背景下的基础工作;茱莉亚·罗斯评论道:“大多数关于批判性白人的德国文本(至少在空白处)都与托妮·莫里森的著作有关。的确,尽管托妮·莫里森1992年的《在黑暗中玩耍:白人与文学想象》特别关注的是“非洲主义者的存在”是如何在19世纪和20世纪的美国白人作家的文学中出现和定义的,但她提出了一系列问题,并要求进行进一步的研究,我认为这些问题完全适用于其他(前)国家文学和时期。在她的序言中,莫里森质疑种族与人文主义或普遍文学概念之间的关系:“‘文学上的白人’和‘文学上的黑人’是如何形成的,这种建构的后果是什么?”嵌入种族(非种族主义)语言的假设是如何在希望有时声称是“人文主义”的文学事业中发挥作用的?’”(xii-xiii)在文本的后面,她提出了一系列明确的项目呼吁,她认为这些项目对于理解文学上的白人至关重要。莫里森问道,“与非洲主义的想象性相遇在哪些方面使白人作家能够思考自己?然后,她详细阐述了这个问题,概述了未来研究的多个领域:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信