Classroom artifacts: Tools to assess the use of active, innovative, and engaging pedagogies among engineering faculty

Michael R. Tomlinson, N. Fortenberry
{"title":"Classroom artifacts: Tools to assess the use of active, innovative, and engaging pedagogies among engineering faculty","authors":"Michael R. Tomlinson, N. Fortenberry","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2008.4720286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines artifacts of the classroom as a method of assessing whether or not engineering faculty are using best-practice teaching methods in class. Past research has achieved success in using artifacts to give similar results as direct observation. Artifacts assessment alone or in combination with surveys would be more accurate and less biased than surveys alone. Success of past portfolio assessment and the rise of college e-portfolio use among faculty make it highly likely that e-portfolios could provide the artifact information necessary for large scale assessment. Additionally, e-portfolios could enhance learning and teaching thereby increasing the willingness of faculty and students to participate nationally.","PeriodicalId":342595,"journal":{"name":"2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2008.4720286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper examines artifacts of the classroom as a method of assessing whether or not engineering faculty are using best-practice teaching methods in class. Past research has achieved success in using artifacts to give similar results as direct observation. Artifacts assessment alone or in combination with surveys would be more accurate and less biased than surveys alone. Success of past portfolio assessment and the rise of college e-portfolio use among faculty make it highly likely that e-portfolios could provide the artifact information necessary for large scale assessment. Additionally, e-portfolios could enhance learning and teaching thereby increasing the willingness of faculty and students to participate nationally.
课堂人工制品:在工程学院中评估积极、创新和引人入胜的教学方法使用的工具
本文考察了课堂人工制品作为评估工程学院是否在课堂上使用最佳实践教学方法的一种方法。过去的研究在使用人工制品获得与直接观察相似的结果方面取得了成功。单独的人工制品评估或与调查相结合将比单独的调查更准确,更少偏见。过去投资组合评估的成功和大学教师中电子投资组合使用的增加使得电子投资组合极有可能为大规模评估提供必要的工件信息。此外,电子档案可以加强学习和教学,从而提高教师和学生参与全国的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信