Measuring extreme-ultraviolet secondary electron blur (Conference Presentation)

Steven Grzeskowiak, R. Brainard, G. Denbeaux
{"title":"Measuring extreme-ultraviolet secondary electron blur (Conference Presentation)","authors":"Steven Grzeskowiak, R. Brainard, G. Denbeaux","doi":"10.1117/12.2515428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extreme-ultraviolet (~13.5 nm) lithography is much different than the previous lithographic wavelength such that chemical reactions within the resist are caused by electrons generated from ionization. As the lithographic community moves towards printing more advanced nodes, the secondary electron blur from extreme-ultraviolet photons becomes more critical. Understanding the range of the secondary electrons from the photoionization site would provide insight into patterning capabilities for different photoresists and aid in the development of improved models. Here, we aim to determine the range of electrons by measuring the thickness loss due to top-down electron beam exposure. More importantly, this work focuses on measuring the thickness loss due to incident electrons with energies less than 80 eV for two different resist systems: (1) a chemically amplified photoresist where acid diffusion affects the depth of solubility changing reactions, and (2) a non-chemically amplified photoresist, PMMA, where no acid diffusion occurs. Photoresists are exposed to electrons, baked, and developed; subsequent ellipsometry is used to quantify the depth at which solubility changing reactions occur based on the incident energy and dose. Quencher concentration and post-exposure bake parameters are varied to mitigate acid diffusion to extrapolate the electron range. The results are then compared to the thickness loss of the non-chemically amplified photoresist.","PeriodicalId":437977,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Patterning Materials and Processes XXXVI","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Patterning Materials and Processes XXXVI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2515428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Extreme-ultraviolet (~13.5 nm) lithography is much different than the previous lithographic wavelength such that chemical reactions within the resist are caused by electrons generated from ionization. As the lithographic community moves towards printing more advanced nodes, the secondary electron blur from extreme-ultraviolet photons becomes more critical. Understanding the range of the secondary electrons from the photoionization site would provide insight into patterning capabilities for different photoresists and aid in the development of improved models. Here, we aim to determine the range of electrons by measuring the thickness loss due to top-down electron beam exposure. More importantly, this work focuses on measuring the thickness loss due to incident electrons with energies less than 80 eV for two different resist systems: (1) a chemically amplified photoresist where acid diffusion affects the depth of solubility changing reactions, and (2) a non-chemically amplified photoresist, PMMA, where no acid diffusion occurs. Photoresists are exposed to electrons, baked, and developed; subsequent ellipsometry is used to quantify the depth at which solubility changing reactions occur based on the incident energy and dose. Quencher concentration and post-exposure bake parameters are varied to mitigate acid diffusion to extrapolate the electron range. The results are then compared to the thickness loss of the non-chemically amplified photoresist.
测量极紫外二次电子模糊(会议报告)
极紫外(~13.5 nm)光刻与以前的光刻波长有很大不同,因此抗蚀剂内的化学反应是由电离产生的电子引起的。随着光刻界向印刷更先进的节点移动,极紫外光子的二次电子模糊变得更加关键。了解来自光电离位点的二次电子的范围将有助于深入了解不同光刻胶的图像化能力,并有助于改进模型的开发。在这里,我们的目标是通过测量由自上而下的电子束照射引起的厚度损失来确定电子的范围。更重要的是,这项工作的重点是测量两种不同的抗蚀剂系统(1)化学放大的光抗蚀剂,酸扩散影响溶解度变化反应的深度,以及(2)非化学放大的光抗蚀剂PMMA,没有酸扩散发生。光刻胶暴露于电子、烘烤和显影;根据入射能量和剂量,随后使用椭偏法来量化改变溶解度的反应发生的深度。通过改变淬灭剂浓度和曝光后烘烤参数来减缓酸扩散,从而推断出电子范围。然后将结果与非化学放大光刻胶的厚度损失进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信