{"title":"Pyeloplasty effectiveness in cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: methodology and assessment parameters","authors":"V. Sizonov, A. K. Shidaev, M. Kogan","doi":"10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-4-5-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the analysis of published data (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/MedLine, The Cochrane Library, and eLIBRARY databases) devoted to the study of existing criteria for assessment of pyeloplasty effectiveness. Published sources most often refer to the dynamics of reduction of the renal collecting system (RCS) and postoperative renal functional status as the assessment criteria. However, there are no consistent values, which could be employed as assessment criteria indicating success as soon as they are registered. The tools used to estimate RCS reduction are not standardized in terms of research techniques, projection of RCS dilatation measurement, and the locations between which renal and pelvic anatomic structures are measured. A variety of approaches to measuring the anteroposterior renal pelvis dimension in children with hydronephrosis tends to blur the analysis of actual pyeloplasty results. This review of published sources demonstrates the lack of agreement as regards the criteria for assessment of pyeloplasty effectiveness. There is a pressing need for appropriate steps to harmonize ultrasonography methods, to standardize the anatomic landmarks for measurement, and to define the criteria to be used to assess the effectiveness of pyeloplasty.","PeriodicalId":345779,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Urologii","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Urologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-4-5-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article presents the analysis of published data (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/MedLine, The Cochrane Library, and eLIBRARY databases) devoted to the study of existing criteria for assessment of pyeloplasty effectiveness. Published sources most often refer to the dynamics of reduction of the renal collecting system (RCS) and postoperative renal functional status as the assessment criteria. However, there are no consistent values, which could be employed as assessment criteria indicating success as soon as they are registered. The tools used to estimate RCS reduction are not standardized in terms of research techniques, projection of RCS dilatation measurement, and the locations between which renal and pelvic anatomic structures are measured. A variety of approaches to measuring the anteroposterior renal pelvis dimension in children with hydronephrosis tends to blur the analysis of actual pyeloplasty results. This review of published sources demonstrates the lack of agreement as regards the criteria for assessment of pyeloplasty effectiveness. There is a pressing need for appropriate steps to harmonize ultrasonography methods, to standardize the anatomic landmarks for measurement, and to define the criteria to be used to assess the effectiveness of pyeloplasty.
这篇文章分析了已发表的数据(Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/MedLine, The Cochrane Library和eLIBRARY数据库),致力于研究肾盂成形术有效性评估的现有标准。已发表的文献大多将肾收集系统(RCS)的减少动态和术后肾功能状态作为评估标准。然而,没有一致的价值,这些价值一旦登记就可以作为表明成功的评估标准。用于估计RCS缩小的工具在研究技术、RCS扩张测量的投影以及测量肾脏和盆腔解剖结构之间的位置方面没有标准化。多种方法测量肾盂前后尺寸的儿童肾盂积水往往模糊分析实际肾盂成形术的结果。这篇对已发表文献的回顾表明,肾盂成形术有效性的评估标准缺乏一致性。迫切需要采取适当的步骤来协调超声检查方法,标准化测量的解剖标志,并确定用于评估肾盂成形术有效性的标准。