An audit of pain management at a tertiary care center

Dhananjay Kumar, B. Jat, S. Pachaury, H. Verma
{"title":"An audit of pain management at a tertiary care center","authors":"Dhananjay Kumar, B. Jat, S. Pachaury, H. Verma","doi":"10.4103/ssj.ssj_44_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pain management is a vital part of postoperative treatment. Pain management in the postoperative period is based on a number of factors such as the extent of surgery, patient profile and surgeon experience, etc. The numbers of subjective scoring system were proposed to scale the severity of pain. Materials and Methods: This prospective audit was performed between November 2015 to January 2016. Pain scores were recorded in all patients underwent surgery for initial three days by numerical rating scale (NRS). Results: A total of 92 patients were included in this audit. The patients were broadly divided into the two groups: non-malignancy group and malignancy group. Pain scores were found higher in adult patients, in malignancy patients, and in patients who require wide excision. The scores were found on the lower side in the ear and throat surgery group in comparison to the nose surgery group. Discussion: Postoperative pain is an individual multi-factorial experience. Poor management is likely to increases the chances of local and systemic complications and delays in the recovery of the patients. Appropriate selection of analgesics would reduce hospital financial burden to a great extent but the side effect profile of each drug should be kept in mind.","PeriodicalId":420307,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Surgical Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Surgical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ssj.ssj_44_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pain management is a vital part of postoperative treatment. Pain management in the postoperative period is based on a number of factors such as the extent of surgery, patient profile and surgeon experience, etc. The numbers of subjective scoring system were proposed to scale the severity of pain. Materials and Methods: This prospective audit was performed between November 2015 to January 2016. Pain scores were recorded in all patients underwent surgery for initial three days by numerical rating scale (NRS). Results: A total of 92 patients were included in this audit. The patients were broadly divided into the two groups: non-malignancy group and malignancy group. Pain scores were found higher in adult patients, in malignancy patients, and in patients who require wide excision. The scores were found on the lower side in the ear and throat surgery group in comparison to the nose surgery group. Discussion: Postoperative pain is an individual multi-factorial experience. Poor management is likely to increases the chances of local and systemic complications and delays in the recovery of the patients. Appropriate selection of analgesics would reduce hospital financial burden to a great extent but the side effect profile of each drug should be kept in mind.
对三级保健中心疼痛管理的审计
疼痛管理是术后治疗的重要组成部分。术后疼痛的处理是基于许多因素,如手术的程度,病人的情况和外科医生的经验等。提出了主观评分系统的数量来衡量疼痛的严重程度。材料和方法:本次前瞻性审核于2015年11月至2016年1月进行。采用数值评定量表(NRS)记录所有手术患者最初三天的疼痛评分。结果:本次审核共纳入92例患者。将患者大致分为两组:非恶性组和恶性组。成人患者、恶性肿瘤患者和需要大范围切除的患者疼痛评分较高。与鼻外科组相比,耳喉外科组的得分较低。讨论:术后疼痛是一种个体的多因素体验。管理不善可能会增加局部和全身并发症的机会,并延误患者的康复。合理选择镇痛药可在很大程度上减轻医院的经济负担,但应考虑到每种药物的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信