New and Old Materials in the Architectural Heritage. Case Study: Behaviour of Glass Fiber Reinforced Lime Based Concrete

A. Almerich-Chulia, J. Moreno-Puchalt, A. Alonso-Durá, Veronica Llopis-Pulido
{"title":"New and Old Materials in the Architectural Heritage. Case Study: Behaviour of Glass Fiber Reinforced Lime Based Concrete","authors":"A. Almerich-Chulia, J. Moreno-Puchalt, A. Alonso-Durá, Veronica Llopis-Pulido","doi":"10.18178/ijscer.8.3.196-203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the importance of structural interventions in architectural heritage for repairing and strengthening has increased considerably. During the 20th century, there has been a tendency to replace traditional materials with the most widespread “new” materials used: steel and reinforced concrete. However, in many cases, the durability of the interventions has not been as expected. An extensive damage to the ancient masonry due to incompatibility of reinforced concrete with the old materials has been clearly established, leading to a rapid deterioration. International centers, such as ICOMOS, have recommended the use of materials similar in composition and properties to the original ones for the restoration works. An adequate choice of mortars is critical to the success of a restoration process. Compatibility between the new mortar and the original components is very desirable. So that, the renascence of lime based mortars technology for the restoration of historic structures has been observed. Besides that, steel presents several practical difficulties in protecting against corrosion and environmental effects, and sometimes in their handling at the construction site. As an alternative, steel can be replaced with advanced fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) materials, commonly called composites, which offer excellent physical and mechanical properties and are lightweight and insensitive to corrosion. The present analysis shows the use of lime-based concrete, with pozzolanic loads, internally reinforced by GFRP bars. Lime concrete manages to consolidate the existing historical building, providing safety to masonry structure and solving their structural problems. In addition, GFRP bars exhibit a high tensile strength required. The performance of this combination is investigated by numerical simulation using the FEM method. The response is simulated firstly with current materials (as reference) and finally with the proposed lime based concrete reinforced with GFRP. ","PeriodicalId":101411,"journal":{"name":"International journal of structural and civil engineering research","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of structural and civil engineering research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijscer.8.3.196-203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the importance of structural interventions in architectural heritage for repairing and strengthening has increased considerably. During the 20th century, there has been a tendency to replace traditional materials with the most widespread “new” materials used: steel and reinforced concrete. However, in many cases, the durability of the interventions has not been as expected. An extensive damage to the ancient masonry due to incompatibility of reinforced concrete with the old materials has been clearly established, leading to a rapid deterioration. International centers, such as ICOMOS, have recommended the use of materials similar in composition and properties to the original ones for the restoration works. An adequate choice of mortars is critical to the success of a restoration process. Compatibility between the new mortar and the original components is very desirable. So that, the renascence of lime based mortars technology for the restoration of historic structures has been observed. Besides that, steel presents several practical difficulties in protecting against corrosion and environmental effects, and sometimes in their handling at the construction site. As an alternative, steel can be replaced with advanced fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) materials, commonly called composites, which offer excellent physical and mechanical properties and are lightweight and insensitive to corrosion. The present analysis shows the use of lime-based concrete, with pozzolanic loads, internally reinforced by GFRP bars. Lime concrete manages to consolidate the existing historical building, providing safety to masonry structure and solving their structural problems. In addition, GFRP bars exhibit a high tensile strength required. The performance of this combination is investigated by numerical simulation using the FEM method. The response is simulated firstly with current materials (as reference) and finally with the proposed lime based concrete reinforced with GFRP. 
建筑遗产中的新旧材料。案例研究:玻璃纤维增强石灰基混凝土的性能
近年来,建筑遗产中结构干预对修复和加固的重要性显著增加。在20世纪,有一种趋势是用最广泛使用的“新”材料取代传统材料:钢和钢筋混凝土。然而,在许多情况下,干预措施的持久性并不像预期的那样。由于钢筋混凝土与旧材料的不相容性,古代砖石结构受到了广泛的破坏,导致其迅速恶化。国际古迹遗址理事会(ICOMOS)等国际中心建议,在修复工作中使用与原始材料成分和性能相似的材料。适当的砂浆选择对修复过程的成功至关重要。新砂浆与原有构件之间的相容性是非常理想的。由此可见,石灰基砂浆技术在历史建筑修复中的复兴。除此之外,钢铁在防止腐蚀和环境影响方面存在一些实际困难,有时在施工现场处理时也存在困难。作为替代方案,可以用先进的纤维增强聚合物(FRP)材料(通常称为复合材料)代替钢,这种材料具有优异的物理和机械性能,而且重量轻,对腐蚀不敏感。目前的分析表明,使用石灰基混凝土,与火山灰荷载,内部由玻璃钢钢筋加固。石灰混凝土加固了现有的历史建筑,为砖石结构提供了安全保障,解决了砖石结构的结构问题。此外,GFRP筋具有较高的拉伸强度要求。采用有限元方法对该组合的性能进行了数值模拟。首先用现有材料(作为参考)模拟响应,最后用GFRP加固石灰基混凝土模拟响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信