Space Mining Governance from the Perspective of International Consultations with regard to Marine Genetic Resources and the Multilateralism-Unilateralism Dichotomy – Preliminary Considerations

Łukasz Kułaga
{"title":"Space Mining Governance from the Perspective of International Consultations with regard to Marine Genetic Resources and the Multilateralism-Unilateralism Dichotomy – Preliminary Considerations","authors":"Łukasz Kułaga","doi":"10.21697/PRIEL.2017.6.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 50 th anniversary of the constitution of international space law – 1967 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (hereinafter Outer Space Treaty) coincided with enacting legislation regarding the commercial use of the space resources by the United States in November 2015 and preparation of an analogical act on the other side of the Atlantic, in Luxemburg. These domestic initiatives commenced an intensive discussion with regard to its legality, legitimacy and suitability. Until now the debate related to exploitation of the space natural resources was to large extend concentrated on the interpretation of fundamental customary and Outer Space treaty principles and did not take into account new scientific tools, which can significantly contribute to the assessment of the space mining governance. As first such a instrument – this article recognizes current international consultations on the marine genetic resources aimed at creation of new international regime, which can have several important similarities with the space law resources regime. As the second instrument – this article identifies multilateralism-unilateralism dichotomy, which have practical implications for process of finding international framework relating to space mining. The issue of space mining is the subject of discussion on international fora. In particular from March 2017 it started to be discussed by the COPUOS Legal Subcommittee. The outer space technologies constitute a sector of global economy, which is considered as the most prospective one. According to European Commission “The space sector is both a driver to scientific progress and enables systems and services with growth potential (…) These systems and services (…) help us to address major societal challenges such as climate change, scarce resources. health, or the ageing of our population. (…) They stimulate innovation and competitiveness well beyond the space sector, and contribute to economic growth and job creation in almost all economic areas”. This assessment is supported by figures. According to European Space Agency: “In 2015, the global space economy maintained its long-term growth trend, expanding from 14% compared to 2014 and totaling 291.4 billion of euro. Thus, proposing new scientific instruments for international community aiming at evaluation of the space mining will  constitute a valuable tool in the search for appropriate model of governance in this regard.The 50 th anniversary of the constitution of internationalspace law – 1967 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of Statesin the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon andOther Celestial Bodies (hereinafter Outer Space Treaty) coincided withenacting legislation regarding the commercial use of the space resources bythe United States in November 2015 and preparation of an analogical acton the other side of the Atlantic, in Luxemburg. These domestic initiativescommenced an intensive discussion with regard to its legality, legitimacyand suitability. Until now the debate related to exploitation of the spacenatural resources was to large extend concentrated on the interpretationof fundamental customary and Outer Space treaty principles anddid not take into account new scientific tools, which can significantlycontribute to the assessment of the space mining governance. As first such* Assistant professor, Faculty of Law and Administration, Cardinal Stefan WyszyńskiUniversity in Warsaw.66Łukasz Kułagaa instrument – this article recognizes current international consultationson the marine genetic resources aimed at creation of new internationalregime, which can have several important similarities with the spacelaw resources regime. As the second instrument – this article identifiesmultilateralism-unilateralism dichotomy, which have practical implicationsfor process of finding international framework relating to space mining.The issue of space mining is the subject of discussion on internationalfora. In particular from March 2017 it started to be discussed by the COPUOSLegal Subcommittee. The outer space technologies constitute a sectorof global economy, which is considered as the most prospective one. Accordingto European Commission “The space sector is both a driver to scientificprogress and enables systems and services with growth potential (…) Thesesystems and services (…) help us to address major societal challenges suchas climate change, scarce resources. health, or the ageing of our population.(…) They stimulate innovation and competitiveness well beyond the spacesector, and contribute to economic growth and job creation in almostall economic areas”. This assessment is supported by figures. Accordingto European Space Agency: “In 2015, the global space economy maintainedits long-term growth trend, expanding from 14% compared to 2014 andtotaling 291.4 billion of euro. Thus, proposing new scientific instrumentsfor international community aiming at evaluation of the space mining willconstitute a valuable tool in the search for appropriate model of governancein this regard","PeriodicalId":269602,"journal":{"name":"Polish Review of International and European Law","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Review of International and European Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21697/PRIEL.2017.6.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 50 th anniversary of the constitution of international space law – 1967 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (hereinafter Outer Space Treaty) coincided with enacting legislation regarding the commercial use of the space resources by the United States in November 2015 and preparation of an analogical act on the other side of the Atlantic, in Luxemburg. These domestic initiatives commenced an intensive discussion with regard to its legality, legitimacy and suitability. Until now the debate related to exploitation of the space natural resources was to large extend concentrated on the interpretation of fundamental customary and Outer Space treaty principles and did not take into account new scientific tools, which can significantly contribute to the assessment of the space mining governance. As first such a instrument – this article recognizes current international consultations on the marine genetic resources aimed at creation of new international regime, which can have several important similarities with the space law resources regime. As the second instrument – this article identifies multilateralism-unilateralism dichotomy, which have practical implications for process of finding international framework relating to space mining. The issue of space mining is the subject of discussion on international fora. In particular from March 2017 it started to be discussed by the COPUOS Legal Subcommittee. The outer space technologies constitute a sector of global economy, which is considered as the most prospective one. According to European Commission “The space sector is both a driver to scientific progress and enables systems and services with growth potential (…) These systems and services (…) help us to address major societal challenges such as climate change, scarce resources. health, or the ageing of our population. (…) They stimulate innovation and competitiveness well beyond the space sector, and contribute to economic growth and job creation in almost all economic areas”. This assessment is supported by figures. According to European Space Agency: “In 2015, the global space economy maintained its long-term growth trend, expanding from 14% compared to 2014 and totaling 291.4 billion of euro. Thus, proposing new scientific instruments for international community aiming at evaluation of the space mining will  constitute a valuable tool in the search for appropriate model of governance in this regard.The 50 th anniversary of the constitution of internationalspace law – 1967 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of Statesin the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon andOther Celestial Bodies (hereinafter Outer Space Treaty) coincided withenacting legislation regarding the commercial use of the space resources bythe United States in November 2015 and preparation of an analogical acton the other side of the Atlantic, in Luxemburg. These domestic initiativescommenced an intensive discussion with regard to its legality, legitimacyand suitability. Until now the debate related to exploitation of the spacenatural resources was to large extend concentrated on the interpretationof fundamental customary and Outer Space treaty principles anddid not take into account new scientific tools, which can significantlycontribute to the assessment of the space mining governance. As first such* Assistant professor, Faculty of Law and Administration, Cardinal Stefan WyszyńskiUniversity in Warsaw.66Łukasz Kułagaa instrument – this article recognizes current international consultationson the marine genetic resources aimed at creation of new internationalregime, which can have several important similarities with the spacelaw resources regime. As the second instrument – this article identifiesmultilateralism-unilateralism dichotomy, which have practical implicationsfor process of finding international framework relating to space mining.The issue of space mining is the subject of discussion on internationalfora. In particular from March 2017 it started to be discussed by the COPUOSLegal Subcommittee. The outer space technologies constitute a sectorof global economy, which is considered as the most prospective one. Accordingto European Commission “The space sector is both a driver to scientificprogress and enables systems and services with growth potential (…) Thesesystems and services (…) help us to address major societal challenges suchas climate change, scarce resources. health, or the ageing of our population.(…) They stimulate innovation and competitiveness well beyond the spacesector, and contribute to economic growth and job creation in almostall economic areas”. This assessment is supported by figures. Accordingto European Space Agency: “In 2015, the global space economy maintainedits long-term growth trend, expanding from 14% compared to 2014 andtotaling 291.4 billion of euro. Thus, proposing new scientific instrumentsfor international community aiming at evaluation of the space mining willconstitute a valuable tool in the search for appropriate model of governancein this regard
从海洋遗传资源国际协商和多边-单边主义二分法的角度看空间采矿治理-初步考虑
在国际空间法——1967年《关于各国探索和利用包括月球和其他天体在内的外层空间活动的原则条约》(以下简称《外层空间条约》)制定50周年之际,美国于2015年11月颁布了关于空间资源商业利用的立法,并在大西洋彼岸的卢森堡准备了一项类似的法案。这些国内倡议开始了关于其合法性、合法性和适宜性的深入讨论。到目前为止,有关开发空间自然资源的辩论在很大程度上集中于解释基本习惯原则和外层空间条约原则,而没有考虑到新的科学工具,而这些工具可以大大有助于评估空间采矿治理。作为第一个这样的文书- -本条承认目前关于海洋遗传资源的国际协商旨在建立新的国际制度,这一制度可以与空间法资源制度有几个重要的相似之处。作为第二份文书,本文确定了多边主义-单边主义的二分法,这对寻找有关空间地雷的国际框架的进程具有实际影响。空间采矿问题是国际论坛上讨论的主题。特别是从2017年3月起,外空委员会法律小组委员会开始讨论这一问题。外层空间技术构成了全球经济的一个部门,被认为是最具发展前景的一个部门。根据欧盟委员会的说法,“航天部门既是科学进步的驱动力,也是具有增长潜力的系统和服务的推动力(……)这些系统和服务(……)帮助我们应对气候变化、资源稀缺等重大社会挑战。”健康,或者人口老龄化。(…)它们刺激远远超出空间部门的创新和竞争力,并在几乎所有经济领域促进经济增长和创造就业机会”。这一评估得到了数据的支持。据欧洲航天局称:“2015年,全球太空经济保持了长期增长趋势,与2014年相比增长了14%,总额达到2914亿欧元。因此,为国际社会提出旨在评价空间采矿的新的科学工具将是在这方面寻求适当治理模式的宝贵工具。国际空间法——1967年《关于各国探索和利用包括月球和其他天体在内的外层空间活动的原则条约》(以下简称《外层空间条约》)制定50周年之际,美国于2015年11月颁布了有关太空资源商业利用的立法,并准备在大西洋彼岸的卢森堡采取类似行动。这些国内倡议开始了关于其合法性,合法性和适用性的深入讨论。迄今为止,与空间自然资源开发有关的辩论在很大程度上集中于对基本习惯原则和外层空间条约原则的解释,而没有考虑到可以大大有助于评估空间采矿治理的新的科学工具。作为第一个这样的人*法律和行政学院助理教授,红衣主教斯特凡WyszyńskiUniversity在Warsaw.66Łukasz Kułagaa文书-本文承认目前关于海洋遗传资源的国际磋商旨在建立新的国际制度,这可以与空间法资源制度有几个重要的相似之处。作为第二份文书,本文确定了多边主义-单边主义的二分法,这对寻找与空间采矿有关的国际框架的进程具有实际意义。空间采矿问题是国际论坛上讨论的主题。特别是从2017年3月起,外空委员会法律小组委员会开始讨论这一问题。外层空间技术是全球经济中最具发展前景的产业之一。根据欧盟委员会的说法,“航天部门既是科学进步的驱动力,也是具有增长潜力的系统和服务的推动力……这些系统和服务……帮助我们应对气候变化、资源稀缺等重大社会挑战。”(…)它们激发了远远超出太空领域的创新和竞争力,并在几乎所有经济领域促进了经济增长和创造就业机会"。这一评估得到了数据的支持。据欧洲航天局称:“2015年,全球太空经济保持长期增长趋势,与2014年相比增长了14%,总额达到2914亿欧元。 因此,为国际社会提出旨在评价空间采矿的新的科学手段将是在这方面寻求适当治理模式的宝贵工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信