Is Family Responsibilities Discrimination the New Sex Discrimination? Lessonsfrom School Teachersâ Perceptions

L. Mullins
{"title":"Is Family Responsibilities Discrimination the New Sex Discrimination? Lessonsfrom School Teachersâ Perceptions","authors":"L. Mullins","doi":"10.4172/2315-7844.1000142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory mixed-methods study uses grounded theory to examine the organizational and individual dimensions of Family Responsibilities Discrimination (FRD) and perceptions of FRD as a phenomenon and emerging law. By employing a primarily qualitative embedded research design, semi-structured interviews and exit surveys were conducted in three New Jersey public schools to study a sample of teachers and similarly situated professional staff to investigate these topics. This study is the first of its kind to examine FRD, as opposed to gender discrimination, in relation to public sector employees, specifically public school professionals. The results of the analysis of the data, consisting of qualitative themes extracted from the interviews and descriptive statistics from the exit surveys, show that current organizational factors not only fail to mitigate effects of FRD on the work/family balancing act but sometimes contribute to them, and that there is a lack of awareness of the legal concept of FRD, despite knowledge of the existence of discrimination against people with family responsibilities. Based on these preliminary results, recommendations for future research and action in the field are suggested.","PeriodicalId":413735,"journal":{"name":"Review of Public Administration and Management","volume":"101 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Public Administration and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2315-7844.1000142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This exploratory mixed-methods study uses grounded theory to examine the organizational and individual dimensions of Family Responsibilities Discrimination (FRD) and perceptions of FRD as a phenomenon and emerging law. By employing a primarily qualitative embedded research design, semi-structured interviews and exit surveys were conducted in three New Jersey public schools to study a sample of teachers and similarly situated professional staff to investigate these topics. This study is the first of its kind to examine FRD, as opposed to gender discrimination, in relation to public sector employees, specifically public school professionals. The results of the analysis of the data, consisting of qualitative themes extracted from the interviews and descriptive statistics from the exit surveys, show that current organizational factors not only fail to mitigate effects of FRD on the work/family balancing act but sometimes contribute to them, and that there is a lack of awareness of the legal concept of FRD, despite knowledge of the existence of discrimination against people with family responsibilities. Based on these preliminary results, recommendations for future research and action in the field are suggested.
家庭责任歧视是新的性别歧视吗?来自学校教师的经验教训
本探索性混合方法研究使用扎根理论来检查家庭责任歧视(FRD)的组织和个人维度,以及对FRD作为一种现象和新兴法律的看法。通过采用主要定性嵌入式研究设计,在新泽西州的三所公立学校进行了半结构化访谈和离职调查,以研究教师和类似情况的专业人员的样本来调查这些主题。这项研究首次对公共部门雇员,特别是公立学校专业人员的性别歧视进行了研究,而不是性别歧视。数据分析的结果包括从访谈中提取的定性主题和从离职调查中获得的描述性统计数据,结果表明,目前的组织因素不仅不能减轻家庭离异对工作/家庭平衡行为的影响,有时还会加剧这种影响,而且尽管知道存在对有家庭责任的人的歧视,但人们对家庭离异的法律概念缺乏认识。在这些初步结果的基础上,对今后的研究和行动提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信