The place of archaeology in integrated cultural landscape management

T. Moore, V. Guichard, J. Sanchis
{"title":"The place of archaeology in integrated cultural landscape management","authors":"T. Moore, V. Guichard, J. Sanchis","doi":"10.5117/jel.2020.1.47039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across Europe, landscape is recognised as a frame through which societal values are defined and embedded. The European Landscape convention and wider research has drawn attention to the need for integrating a diverse range of stakeholders to ensure landscape sustainability. Archaeology is increasingly recognised as having an important place in integrated landscape management but often remains relatively peripheral. This paper examines the place of archaeology in specific European regions and the potential ways of integrating archaeological heritage in landscape management. Emerging from a project funded by the Joint Programme Initiative on Cultural Heritage (Resituating Europe’s FIrst Towns (REFIT): A case study in enhancing knowledge transfer and developing sustainable management of cultural landscapes), we explore the place of a set of common European heritage assets, Iron Age oppida, in the management of the landscape they are a part of and how they might be used better to engage and connect stakeholders. Using four case studies, we review the present integration of archaeology within landscape management and how this operates at a local level. From this we explore what challenges these case-studies present and outline ways in which the REFIT project has sought to develop strategies to respond to these in order to enhance and promote co-productive management of these landscapes.","PeriodicalId":354814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Landscapes","volume":"313 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Landscapes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/jel.2020.1.47039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Across Europe, landscape is recognised as a frame through which societal values are defined and embedded. The European Landscape convention and wider research has drawn attention to the need for integrating a diverse range of stakeholders to ensure landscape sustainability. Archaeology is increasingly recognised as having an important place in integrated landscape management but often remains relatively peripheral. This paper examines the place of archaeology in specific European regions and the potential ways of integrating archaeological heritage in landscape management. Emerging from a project funded by the Joint Programme Initiative on Cultural Heritage (Resituating Europe’s FIrst Towns (REFIT): A case study in enhancing knowledge transfer and developing sustainable management of cultural landscapes), we explore the place of a set of common European heritage assets, Iron Age oppida, in the management of the landscape they are a part of and how they might be used better to engage and connect stakeholders. Using four case studies, we review the present integration of archaeology within landscape management and how this operates at a local level. From this we explore what challenges these case-studies present and outline ways in which the REFIT project has sought to develop strategies to respond to these in order to enhance and promote co-productive management of these landscapes.
考古在综合文化景观管理中的地位
在整个欧洲,景观被认为是定义和嵌入社会价值观的框架。欧洲景观大会和更广泛的研究引起了人们对整合各种利益相关者以确保景观可持续性的必要性的关注。考古学在综合景观管理中占有越来越重要的地位,但往往处于相对边缘的地位。本文考察了考古在欧洲特定地区的地位,以及将考古遗产纳入景观管理的潜在途径。从文化遗产联合计划倡议资助的项目(重新安置欧洲第一个城镇(REFIT):加强知识转移和发展文化景观可持续管理的案例研究)中,我们探索了一系列共同的欧洲遗产资产,铁器时代的奥皮达,在景观管理中的地位,以及如何更好地利用它们来吸引和联系利益相关者。通过四个案例研究,我们回顾了目前考古学在景观管理中的整合,以及它如何在地方层面上运作。由此,我们探讨了这些案例研究所面临的挑战,并概述了REFIT项目寻求制定应对这些挑战的策略的方法,以加强和促进这些景观的共同生产管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信